Gay Marriage Film Analysis

Improved Essays
Marriage has been a widely debated topic throughout the centuries. The definition of marriage has been defined by presidents, teachers, doctors, religious men, psychologists and philosophers. According to the 2015 revised Merriam-Webster dictionary marriage is defined as “the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law [and] the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage” (“Marriage.”). In the film Love Story the main characters, Oliver and Jenny, fall in love and decide to marry soon afterwards. Oliver is a wealthy Harvard Law School student while Jenny is a poor Radcliffe University student. …show more content…
Virginia case that made it illegal for states to ban interracial marriages. Now that interracial couples were given this right, gay couples wanted the same rights. All throughout the United States homosexuals tried to gain this right but everywhere they tried, they would get stumped. In 1972 during Baker v. Nelson marriage rights were denied to gays in Minnesota while in Georgia during the 1986 case of Bowers v. Hardwick homosexual sodomy was banned. On the Pacific coast in Hawaii a state constitutional amendment was passed banning the union between homosexuals (Wolf). To make matters worse for the gay couples in 1996 President Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act, also known as the DOMA, defined marriage to be between a man and a woman and allowed states to refuse the recognition of same sex marriages (“United…”). This ruling caused more than 1,000 federal laws about marriage to become inapplicable to gay couples. These laws not only took away the dignity and equality of gay families but also denied basic human rights (Boonin). During this time period support of gay marriage was at a mere 27% (Smith, …show more content…
would answer this issue (Cintron). At first the legal movement began to lose and in many cases the state decided to fully ban the marriages from occurring. The interesting point of this is that most states where it was banned came from a ballot vote and not courts and legislatures. There is more of an acceptance of the marriage rights by those in the government, especially democrats, than the average American. The opposition to this comes from religious reasoning in the sense that gay couples undermine what marriage is (Smith, P). One noticeable opposition from religions that is changing is that of the Roman Catholic Church. Pope Benedict XVI in 2005 refers to homosexuality as “A strong tendency ordered towards an intrinsic moral evil” and an “Objective disorder” (Donadio). But according to the New York Times, Pope Francis says that homosexuals should be treated with dignity and that the only problem he sees is that they are making a lobby of it. He was the first pope to speak and say the term “gay”. On a plane ride from Brazil Pope Francis stated that “If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?” (Donadio). Although opposition is high, slowly states began to pass laws that made the marriage legal starting with New England and moving towards California. The next major milestone in the gay rights movement occurred in June of the year 2013 during the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Over the last several decades, same-sex marriage has become a controversial issue, with many supporters advocating for legalizing same sex marriage across the United States, and those who oppose it. On June 26, 2015, same-sex marriage became legal in all fifty states when the Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that “states…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Section 20-109

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are only a limited number of ways to terminate alimony or spousal support. Section 20-109(A) of the Virginia Code states that one of those ways is to show that, based upon clear and convincing evidence, the spouse receiving support has been habitually cohabiting with another person in a relationship analogous to a marriage for one year or more. Given that gay marriage is now legal in Virginia, you might think that “cohabitating with another person in a relationship analogous to a marriage” applies to opposite-sex and same-sex couples alike. Not according to the Virginia Court of Appeals in the recent case of Luttrell v. Cucco. Luttrell v. Cucco…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The right to marry might seem trivial to some, but for those who have never been able too, it is an amazing feeling. Although not everyone feels so positively about it, those individuals are not in great company at least that is what the research suggests. That is not to say that these individuals and entities are not causing problems for those trying to enjoy the right. The most notable are the clerks in Kentucky refusing to issue licenses and the courts in Arkansas upholding poor legislation to attack homosexual couples. Overall, this case decision has set the stage for equal protection and treatment for the LGBT…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    On June 26, 2015 the United States Justices decided on a pivotal case in American history. In a close 5-4 vote the Justices deemed that same-sex marriage was constitutional via the 14th amendment. The Obergefell et al. v. Hodges case was the finality of a slow evolving progression for same-sex marriage (Obergefell v. Hodges). This landmark decision allowed same-sex marriage to be legal in the United States.…

    • 1900 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The concept of what defines a marriage has highly been disputed over the past century. In 1996, the U.S. government passed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defined marriage as the union of one woman and one man, and allowed states to ignore same-sex marriages granted in other states. This federal law stood until June 26, 2015 with the case Obergefell v. Hodges, where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 stating that no state can deny a same-sex couple the right to marriage. The court’s official opinion states,”[t]he right of same-sex couples to marry is part of the liberty promised by the Fourteenth Amendment [and] is fundamental under the Due Process Clause.” Why did it take nearly twenty years for the court to synthesize the current…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Civil Rights

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In 1967, (while many states tried to outlaw interracial marriage), the Loving v. Virginia Supreme Court case stated that these laws (outlawing interracial marriage) were unconstitutional. An interracial couple was ordained in a state that allowed interracial marriage, but when they moved to Virginia (a state that did not allow interracial marriage), the couple was charged with disobeying Virginia Law. Finally, the courts declared the bans unconstitutional and stated that marriage was a basic civil right of man, and it was essential to our…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Same-sex couple had proven to be as a stable and equal as opposite-sex couples and the state was not legitimately protecting the morality of society by putting one group down at a lower level when it came to rights, recognition, and protection. The Obergefell case restored the definition of equality to be generally applied that now meant the recognition of same-sex couples under the federal law. Although at the time of ratification the controversy did not involve the dispute of whether same-sex couples would be protected under this amendment, this case shows the continuation of the disagreement in what equality entails. These cases clarified that the constitution was not only color-blind but also blind to sexual…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What would someone do if one’s better half had to be separated by law because of the state they lived in? Richard Loving and his “colored” wife Mildred had to go through that same situation when they lived in their home in the state of Virginia while illegally being married. After being kicked out of their home state, Richard and Mildred decided to take their issue to the Supreme Court and later their story becomes an inspirational documentary. While there are many stories out there about illegal intermarriage and its impact on the people, The Lovings act of civil disobedience in illegal marriage played a crucial role in ending the prohibition in interracial marriage in America. Richard and Mildred Loving lived a simple country life in their home state of Virginia.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Using the Hawaii Supreme Court’s decision can count as a satisfactory point in which the law to discuss became into being. While the history goes back much farther in this case, prior to 1991, the final decision by the court begins in 1993, where they found it unconstitutional for the state of Hawaii to deny same-sex couples the right to marry (Baehr v. Lewin, 1993). In this instance, the Hawaii Supreme Court relied on a perspective of equal protection, rather than due process, to justify their decision in this matter. Shortly thereafter, the case is remanded to the trial court, to allow the state time and an opportunity to establish its reasons as to why they can deny same-sex couples marriage licenses, which the state delayed until 1996…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At that exact moment, American law changed perpetually to include homosexual marriage as a civil…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It was only fifty years ago on June 12, 1967, that the Supreme Court repealed all miscegenation laws giving heterosexual couples of different races the option to marry one another. Miscegenation laws date to the 1600’s with Virginia being the first state to make interracial marriage illegal. There seems to be on common theme behind the miscegenation laws, the fear of interracial sex.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case: Plessy v. Ferguson Cite: 163 U.S. 537 (1896) Vote: 7-1 Opinion: Brown Facts: • In 1890 Louisiana passed the Separate Car Act. o Required different cars for blacks and whites on railroads. • A group of citizens formed Comité des Citoyens in order to repeal and/or fight the laws effect.…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is apparent that Baehr v. Lewin may pave the way for same-sex marriages in Hawaii, but DoMA prevents other states from being forced to recognize their laws. That is why it is important that we in Texas repeal our sodomy law, and legally recognize same-sex marriage, making it possible for gays to be able to enjoy the full benefits of the life-long commitment of love. Hopefully, the generations of the future will be able to look back at gay discrimination as current society looks back at the ridiculousness of sex and race-based discrimination. Works Cited Bull, Chris. Scene of the Crime.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the beginning of time, people have fought over their different opinions. With different opinions, there are bound to be a lot of arguments. Some of the arguments can be big or small, and other arguments people do not like to speak of. One of the most confidential is the right for LGBT communities right to be able to get married. This is an ongoing problem that needs to be settled one way or another.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Same Sex Marriage

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    Catholics believe in many of the same principles other traditional Christians believe: traditional marriage is the only marriage pleasing to God and ultimately for man. Pope Benedict the 16th himself conveyed opposition to gay marriage, not “approv[ing] of legal initiatives that imply a re-evaluation of the life of the couple and the family” (“Should Gay Marriage Be Legal?”). The LDS Church has also spoken out about its strong opposition to same-sex marriage. They believe that “marriage between a man and a woman was instituted by God and is central to His plan for His children and for the well-being of society”( “Church Instructs Leaders on Same-Sex Marriage”). The laws of God, they believe, cannot be altered by what man’s laws shift to as time moves on.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Superior Essays