The Economic Differences Of Federalists And Republicans In 1800

Improved Essays
he Federalists and Republicans in 1800 shared a common goal, furthering the United State 's independence and the prosper of it 's citizen 's, but they held stark differences on how to achieve it. Economically, the Federalists wanted a strong central government with a federal bank, which would finance new business ventures and bring America closer to being a “modern” country like England. The Federalists believed the way to make America more independent and wealthy was to compete with European manufacturing and banks so that the US was not dependent on English goods or credit. Aided by the economic council of Alexander Hamilton, the Federalists hoped to commercialize America and develop a diversified economy with the help of wealthy business …show more content…
His belief was shared by the Republicans and favored the power of government to be aligned with “State 's Rights”. “State 's Right 's” ensured the state government had the final say over the federal government. The Republicans did not trust the federal government and felt it was too similar to the monarchy of England. They felt a strong federal government would leave them vulnerable and unprotected. They trusted the state government, closer to their homes, to protect their way of life and the practice of slavery. The Federalists had the exact opposite opinion of how the nation should be politically formed. They strived a strong central government, with the power coming from the federal level. In this manner they believed the nation could be guided by the best equipped and intelligent leaders, to form the country into a unified nation, more powerful then an operation of individual states running independently but belonging to one name. Jefferson and the Republican 's firmly believed in the motto, “Government is best which governs least.” They supported less government involvement in all matters, meaning less taxes, less government funded programs, less military, and less oversight by the government. The Federalists believed the US needed a powerful government to guide it into the future and provide growth and expansion through strong …show more content…
They were willing to do whatever it took to keep the nation 's “best customer.” The Federalists then, naturally favored an alliance with England in regards to foreign affairs because it would equate to prosperous trade relations. The Republicans sided more with the French when it came to foreign relations. The Republicans did not have a need for a strong allegiance with England and were less concerned with putting off the country because their wealth was not tied directly with trade and commerce as it was with the Federalists. It was not the Republicans ' intention to necessarily cause trouble with foreign nations, they just wanted to be left alone and allow America to be independent from the world. This is the reason also why they didn 't want a strong military, they didn 't want expansion around the globe but instead wanted mere protection from foreign attacks. The separation of the Federalists and the Republicans boils down to one party, the Federalists, wanting to emulate England and become a better version of it, while the other party, the Republicans, wanted to avoid similarities to England and create a society which enable more independence and self

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Each party assumed that the victory of the oppose would lead to the demise of the nation. Federalists feared that Jefferson would undo their contributing accomplishments of the past twelve years (Digital History). In their eyes, a Republican president would bend the Constitution to his likings to his own party. A Republican’s…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While trying to ratify the constitution two parties were formed, the Federalist and Anti-Federalist. Now the Federalist wanted a strong government with a strong executive branch. Now the Federalist felt that the Constitution was fine just the way it was, that there was no need for a Bill of Rights. The Federalist also believed that only the elite and educated should be eligible to lead the colonies. Alexander Hamilton was a great influence with the Federalist since he believed that they should have a strong National Bank to manage money across state borders.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The anti-federalists feared that the central government would become too powerful and that if the government would commit an infraction on the states’ rights. The Federalists were in agreement with the constitution. The federalists were wealthy, well educated and were unified by the thought of higher power. The leaders of the Federalists included John Adams and Alexander Hamilton both yearned for an effective constitution. In contrast, the Anti-federalists were generally farmers and anybody that fell below the line of being wealthy.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, the Democratic-Republicans told about how uncentralized the United States would be if they were under the federal during Adams's presidency. Republicans' agreed that they wanted to expand of the U.S. army and navy, undertake on individual rights in the Alien and Sedition Acts, and new taxes and decrease the spending money used to support many of the federal actions that were being done. The main thing the Federalists wanted was a strong federal authority to prevent the extras of popular majorities, while the Democratic-Republicans wanted to take away majority of the national authority so that the people could rule more through state governments and let it be brought to one as a whole…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To this day, both sides, Anti-Federalist and Federalist, sound persuasive. The Anti-Federalists focused on the American want for local governments that respond directly to popular concerns. The Federalists argued that only a national government could really protect the people’s rights and turn the new nation into a great power. But more than just this are many other issues including that smaller states, who feel that they are operating just fine, will get the short end of the straw.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Americans’ rights and liberties are overtly expressed through the Bill of Rights. Federalists and Republicans possessed contradicting views of the same document, fueling debate. Key Federalists such as Alexander Hamilton intelligently reformed the American economy, eliminating the national debt. The Federalist Papers strategically expressed the movement’s motivations and ideals, thus bolstering support. More than 200 years later, the Federalist-Antifederalist debate comprised of the same key issues that face our nation…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists wanted a more centralized government, favored the Bill of Rights, Separation of Powers which made 3 equal branches of government, judicial, executive, and legislative. The Anti-Federalists believed in states’ rights and states’…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Shay's Rebellion

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Anti-Federalists feared a powerful government would oppress the people. They argued that the new constitution was too much like the powerful British Monarchy. Anti-federalist thought the power should remain with the states and local governments.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The republicans wanted to protect the rights of individual states, along with its citizens and believed that government should represent the majority such as farmers or the “working man,” therefore a strong central government would allow too much power to a single person. The republicans had a very strict interpretation of the constitution; they read the constitution literally in order to keep the government honest. Evidence of this is shown in Jefferson’s opinion written in the “Debate on the First National Bank.” While the Federalists were for the National Bank and Alexander Hamilton argued the constitutionality of the bank upon the basis of the…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists are who instated the foundation for what our country is. Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had an opinions on how the nation should exist. However, the ideals of each group conflicted on multiple levels. Originally, the first draft for a constitution was established by the Articles of Confederation in 1778 (Kramnick, pg155). This was a document to draft laws for the newly independent states.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Anti-Federalists felt that states were free agents that should manage their own revenue and spend their money as they saw fit, while the Federalists felt that many individual and different fiscal and monetary policies led to economic…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Democrat-Republicans had to adopt Federalist beliefs to "keep up with the times" defined in laws such as the Embargo Act, and the Louisiana Purchase. Vice versa, the Federalists had to adopt Republican stances to somewhat partially hold their power in the nation, holding conventions and authoring journals that eventually led to their…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1787, the Continental Congress was brought together in the Philadelphia Convention to revise the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution was written and since people had different views on how to interpret it, two political parties were eventually formed: The federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. The main reason for the rise of political parties during the 1790s was because each of the parties favored different political and economical reforms needed as a new, developing country. Alexander Hamilton led the Federalists and they favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution, while Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic-Republican Party favored strict interpretation. The Federalists wanted to create a national economy by creating…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    AJ Siciliano, Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists Essay Before the ratification of the constitution, two original political parties fell consistent during the 1700’s, Federalists and Antifederalists. In shorter terms, Federalists wanted a stronger central government to have overall power of the states, rather the Antifederalists wanted something similar to the Articles of Confederation, where the states as individuals, had more power than the central government. Both, although strongly contrasting, contained one main similarity, thirst for the creation of a new country, just with different ideas of how it should function.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both these parties often have different views on how the country should be run and different outlooks on political issues. With these two parties there is still one that is rarely spoken of one of which is the Federalist. The Federalist are supporters of the United States government a U.S. political party founded in 1787 to advocate the establishment of a strong federal government and the adoption by the states of the Constitution. By the 1820’s most of the federal principles had been adopted by the Democratic Party and the Federalist Party was no…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays