The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

Improved Essays
The Federalists and Anti-Fedarlists of the 1780s, were not the first political parties in The United States, but were political factions created to achieve a short term goal. The Federalists were primarily wealthy conservatives from cities and the East Coast. They supported ratification of the Constitution, and a strong central government. The Anti-federalists were composed of working class, poor, rural people, that opposed ratification. They were in favor of a weaker central government that allowed local government to hold more power. Following the ratification of the Constitution the two political alliances were dissolved. Document A strongly expresses support for the Federalist cause. The article starts of expressing the various benefits …show more content…
The article highlights the issues the Anti-Federalists had with the Constitution. The author expresses his belief that without a clear bill of rights the generations to come will not know their rights, and could easily be oppressed by a ruler. The author gives several examples of bill of rights, to serve as an example for the Constitution of the United States. Under the proposed constitution the author believes corruption and greed will spread eventually leading to a country ruled by an absolute monarch. Article C shows support for Federalists cause. The writer clearly express his Federalists beliefs by stating that a strong executive branch is key for a country’s success. The author continues by stating the positives of a strong government, that it protects a nation from foreign threats, keeps the peace, and provides security for everyone’s property and assets. Through a strong central government and executive branch the author believes no one can oppose the Nation, and bring chaos and …show more content…
The author states that in the case of a monarchy the king can be controlled, but with a president no one could stop him from taking charge of his army. The major focus of the article is that a president, in the eyes of the author, can set the terms in which he rules, and that power could turn a president into a dictator. The author believes that even if the president breaks the law he will still be exempt from punishment. The author fears that under the constitution and a president the will face a new form of oppression. A strong Anti-Federalist viewpoint is expressed in the Document F. The author opposed the ratification of the Constitution because he fears that the small group that wrote it has too much influence, which can led to corruption. The author believes even if a person in power acts selfless or the promises to help the people, he will always attempt to benefit himself. The writer fears that by granting power and influence to a select few individuals, they can be easily bribed. The author also believes that the American people will not be accurately represented by the few chosen to represent the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    (Document A) BothBased on Document A, it says that both the central government and states are able to control each other but will have different powers. When writing the Constitution, it gave the central government more power but also let the states have their own freedom. It gave both states and central government the power to make and enforce laws. The Constitution let states rule as they want to but are all rejoiced in one nation.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gage Lozano Perception Recently gaining independence from Great Britain was a notable achievement for the new country of America, but a great divide in the thoughts and actions that would determine the fate of the government became increasingly uneasy. Two opposing ways of thinking evolved and battled for how we would establish our country: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. While both seemingly concerned for the well being of the country, the predominant factor that separates Anti-Federalist Mery Otis Warren from Federalist James Madison is the perception they had over the citizens in their relation to the government. James Madison was concerned with the stability a republic could provide, while Mery Otis Warren wanted to ensure that the government was small, secure, and did not become to powerful or aristocratic. Raised by a wealthy family and very well educated, James Madison easily became a dominant figure in politics.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Short Essay One thing was clear during the convention of 1787, there were an astonishing number of viewpoints that clashed wherever they could. The main topic for debate was the distribution of control. Who would make the decisions for the people the state government or national government? The worry was that if the state government had primary control over the people's interests, who would police them? The Federalists wanted to make sure that the state government officials did not influence political policy to further their own interests.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the failures of the Articles of Confederation, it was clear to the members of the Second Constitutional Convention that serious revisions to our government were necessary to have a prosperous nation. Thus the Constitution, with clear distinctions to the Articles, was drafted. James Madison, often cited as the Father of the Constitution, in conjunction with several other Federalist, like Alexander Hamilton, wrote the Federalist Papers to persuade members of Congress and the states to ratify the document. Noted by history as two of the most influential pieces from the collection, The Federalist Papers, Federalist 10 and Federalist 51 stand out by there clear and persuasive arguments as to why and how a strong national government would protect its citizens.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government was considered weak because it has no authority over interstate and foreign trade matter. States are free to conduct their own respective business and the federal government has no say to whatever states do. So, with states acting like its own sovereign nation rather than a type of government under the federal government, the relationship between the two government is chaotic. In this paper, I am going to discuss further details about why federal government was considered weak under the Articles of Confederation and the changes that were written into the Constitution of the United States that solves the interrelationship problem between the federal and states under the Articles of…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that though a strong government is needed by every nation for stability, but however, a strong government had its bad sides. With a strong government, the nation can become a monarchy again and can overrule and take control of every aspect and the people’s options or views wouldn’t matter or they wouldn’t have a say in anything or any decision. I also believe that if it wasn’t for the Anti-Federalist, we would be overruled by the government and that we, the people of the United States of American, would never have any individual right protected and there would be no creation of the Bill of Rights. Nonetheless, the Constitution was seen as a bundle of compromises and regardless of what side anyone was on.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    James Madison, wrote the Federalist Papers to create a strong government that would last. The Federalists wanted to create a Federal Government that would be strong and unite states as one. The Federalists were wealthy people and plantation owners. In order to counter the anti-Federalists Madison argued that under the Constitution the government does not cause harm to individual states. Madison begins the essay with end goals to show how the government would help, and to try to convince the people that this is the way it should be.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When considering the ultimate purpose of the American Revolution, it was widely regarded as incredulous to establish a fresh Constitution that was perceived of having a replicated concept of the monarchical and centralized British government. Suppressing acts, such as the Stamp Act and Quartering Act of 1765, that were implemented by the monarchical British government onto the colonies are only a couple of the several obvious reasons for the prominent rebellion. With the leadership of Patrick Henry, Thomas Jefferson (though not physically present), Samuel Adams and several more political idols, the anti-federalists expressed the opposition that a powerful central government would threaten the accessibility of natural rights for their citizens.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the Federalist shard many of the same ideas of the Antifederalist such as individual rights (Oaks 223). The Anti-Federalists shared different view on how the government should be ran. Because of their experiences with the tyranny of Great Britain, they feared the establishment of a strong national government. The Anti-Federalists also did not accept the use of separation of powers and checks and balances, because they feared the branches of government would abuse the power and not serve the purpose of protecting the rights and freedoms of the individuals. It was evident in the way they thought things should be ran and why they thought they where right, being that they where from a old-line of republicans and did not favor a system…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The federalists support the constitution and want a strong national government. Alexander Hamilton, John Jay and James Madison were federalists. Most federalists are wealthy, educated and believe a strong national government should control the nation. The federalist papers were a series of essays in newspapers that were put together in a book in 1788 to support the constitution.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Revolution Dbq

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages

    And the ability for the document to be amended for changing times and situations is proof of innovative thinking from the founding fathers. Furthermore, this union of ideals and standards created a government that is “both specific enough to outline the basic powers of our government and flexible (through the process of amendments) that it meets the challenges of contemporary life. It is not a static document of the late 18th century, but a living and breathing source of democracy” (Political Science Research Paper Topic Suggestions on the…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the argument about the ratification of the United States Constitution, both the supporters and the opponents had substantial reasoning for their viewpoints. However, these groups differentiated greatly on what problems were most significant to their arguments. Each group came up with smaller “subgroups” of issues they had with the Constitution or Articles of Confederation. The supporting group of the Constitution was the Federalists, who believed in a strong central government that would better protect and support the new upcoming nation.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two of the major leaders of this group were Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, who was overseas during this time. The Anti-Federalists thought that under the Articles people had the rights that they rightfully deserved. Under the Articles, the poor people benefitted greatly. During the process of trying to get the new Constitution ratified the Anti-Federalists felt that under this new government the rich had all of the power instead of the people (Doc 5). Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Federalist Party

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Various arguments were presented in favor of the Federalist ideology. In keeping with the activities of a strong national government, the Federalist Party…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both these parties often have different views on how the country should be run and different outlooks on political issues. With these two parties there is still one that is rarely spoken of one of which is the Federalist. The Federalist are supporters of the United States government a U.S. political party founded in 1787 to advocate the establishment of a strong federal government and the adoption by the states of the Constitution. By the 1820’s most of the federal principles had been adopted by the Democratic Party and the Federalist Party was no…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays