Importance Of Federalist Paper 70

Great Essays
Federalist paper 70
The federalist paper 70 is an important document that talks about the welfare of the people of the state of New York based on administration of the laws the government. This paper tries to explore the definition of a good government, for it is important for the protection of property against those irregular practices at that time which sometimes interferes with the normal course of justice; to the security of independency against the enterprises and assaults of goals, of faction, and anarchy.
To be specific, the federalist paper 70 is a piece which was written by Alexander Hamilton explaining about the unified executive provided for in the United States Constitution. It was published on March 15, 1788 in The New York describes
…show more content…
The President 's competent powers guaranteed by the Constitution are talked of in Federalist No.70 particularly the executive power (Hamilton et al pp 130-pp 151). Hamilton says that the executive provides stability as it prevents the excess of lawmaking processes and that the executive and judicial review is able to protect the executive from legislative misuse of power. This discussion is related to Hamilton 's liking of the separation of powers in Federal government, which permits the president to execute the laws and carry out their duty as a commander in-chief without being afraid of legislative encroachment on their powers.
The argument is important to understanding the foundation of the presidency because it goes into detail to why the president should be in power. Hamilton still makes the case for duration, implying a presidential term ought to be sufficient so as to support stability in the government of the states. While Hamilton illustrates on the significance of duration in Federalist No. 70, he describes briefly in Federalist No. 70 that the issue of more period in office is supposed to motivate a president to govern in the most appropriate interest of the views of the
…show more content…
In Federalist paper, Alexander Hamilton does not only put down an argument for a unified executive, but also provides ways to counter arguments in support of a many executive. Hamilton uses historical instances and the use of common sense to warn the American people of the downfalls of an executive that is not united structure (Mosteller et al,pp

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Shortly after the ratification of the Constitution, George Washington unanimously won the presidential election of 1789. Striving towards a nation of unity, Washington set up a cabinet of four strong individuals in order to inaugurate a system of both balance and credibility. Although Washington was strongly against political parties, it wasn’t long until they began to emerge. Filling the cabinet with tension, Alexander Hamilton, Secretary of Treasury, and Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State, brought upon new challenges for American politics in the eighteenth century, when they brought two very incompatible visions of what they hoped America’s future would look like to the plate. Additionally, their political and economic differences greatly…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 13 Dbq

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Madison also identifies two ways to eliminate factions such as authoritarianism and conformism. Madison concludes by explaining how the republican form of government addresses the tyranny of the majority problem. In summary, Federalist No. 10 conveys the theory of pluralism that guided the Constitutions chief…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From their conception and drafting in 1776, the Articles of Confederation were nothing but a reaction to the English government. When possible, the colonists continually strived to do the exact opposite of what the English government would. This effort to avoid tyranny resulted in a decentralized, weak, inefficient, and financially poor government, one that was also nigh impossible to change and amend. Not only did this later spur reform, but it also gave impetus to “those who favored a strong central government” (persons such as Alexander Hamilton).…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    James Madison, wrote the Federalist Papers to create a strong government that would last. The Federalists wanted to create a Federal Government that would be strong and unite states as one. The Federalists were wealthy people and plantation owners. In order to counter the anti-Federalists Madison argued that under the Constitution the government does not cause harm to individual states. Madison begins the essay with end goals to show how the government would help, and to try to convince the people that this is the way it should be.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The emotional and dramatic debates of 1787 initiated an event turning change in the structure of the United States government. The passion of James Madison’s ambition to create an equally powered federal government through the division of government branches have set foot to what the modernized American system is seen today. Rakove elaborates in great detail of the trials and errors which the delegates of the 1787 Convention had to endure. However, without the strenuous debates, contemplating opinions, and theoretical views of the Virginia Plan delegates against the New Jersey Plan delegates, the American nation would fail to stand on the strong values of equal government power. From the various attempts to create an organized federal government power and Constitution, the intentions of the delegates of the 1787 Convention were centered upon the values of theory and philosophy rather than…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In American history, few ideological disagreements have been as important as the divide between Alexander Hamilton 's Federalist Party and Thomas Jefferson 's Democrat-Republicans. Both parties were led by brilliant men whose political arguments would lay the foundation for debates on the nature of government in America that are ever present in our national discourse. Hamilton thought America should drive ahead into the future as an industrial and mercantile powerhouse, whereas Thomas Jefferson felt that America 's greatness lied in the "yeoman farmer" and the agrarian traditions he represented. Both sought the best path forward for the young American nation and both would have a chance to put their theories to the test in their capacities as ministers in the Washington Administration…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Critics of the president’s power express their discontent at the president gaining power at the expense of Congress. Due to the vagueness of the powers outlined in the Constitution, many fear that the president can just run rampant and do as he wishes. When looking at the overall positives versus the negatives, the benefits of a strong presidency, namely unification of a country under an individual elected by the nation as a whole out, help rather than hinder our…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rudalevige examines the ways in which the executive branch of government has evolved since it was first constructed under the founding fathers. He has found that the executive branch has become much larger and dramatically evolved since it was first created in the eighteenth century (Rudalevige, X, 2). Undoubtedly some changes were believed to be for the good of the country. At times these changes and expansions have proved to be fatal for the American citizens who were promised to be represented in the Legislative branch of government through the constitution. The creation of president’s dealing in “secrecy”, “deceit”, and “careless exercise of power” certainly developed through time (Rudalevige, 5).…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This alters the role of the presidency because the president can only get elected into office for 8 years and after that he can’t be president anymore. The president tries to do as much as he can once he has been elected into office so he can get re-elected…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Book Review The book “The Presidency of George Washington” by Forest McDonald mostly concentrates on presidential organizations. It talks about how the presidency of George Washington was one of the most significant events in the history of the United States of America. Also, it discusses social factions, national opinionated politics, war debt, and the regulation of the state and federal governments. McDonald, proclaims that, the office of president may have not existed today if not for Washington.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With respect to the federal Constitution, the Jeffersonian Republicans are usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists. To what extent was this characterization of the two parties accurate during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison? As war wages on in Europe, economic and political influence is spreading to America. As the President’s, Jefferson and Madison are challenged by upholding their country’s honor and putting their beliefs into action.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    George Washington’s Farewell Address to the People of the United States was, in essence, Washington’s last-ditch effort to keep America going on the right path before he left office. Washington could see the growing tensions spreading across America, and he knew that factors like split political parties and foreign intervention would only cause the still very young America great stress. When Washington finally made the decision to retire from office, he left behind a series of growing issues that the next president, John Adams, dealt with; however, the original plan Washington had was to retire after only one term, so the first draft of his Farwell Address, co-written with James Madison , didn’t include many of the issues Washington brought up in his publicized speech. When he turned to Alexander Hamilton to edit what Madison had originally written, Hamilton expanded on issues like “foreign affairs, and updated it to reflect the Washington Administration’s revised neutrality policy .” The final draft, published on September 19, 1796, went through several stages of revision and was edited by Thomas Jefferson and Timothy Pickering , among others, and it mainly focused on the importance of a unified government, the dangers of a two-party system, and the negative influence of getting involved in foreign affairs.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    constitution, led by Hamilton and Madison, set the stage for a self-governing America. “No one planned the process that produced America’s Constitution”, but it all started in September of 1780 when “Hamilton was the first to conclude that a new government was needed”, even before the Articles of Confederation took effect and called for congress “to revise the Articles”. Calling upon congress to come together and agree was a difficult and long process. Hamilton was always ready for a national convention, yet Madison “was not ready for that drastic step”, but “after the Mount Vernon conference and a trip to New York and Philadelphia, Madison warmed to the idea of a national convention”. The Articles of Confederation needed to be revised, “the weakness of the national government afflicted everyday life” from not having a uniform currency to voting in congress and the complex almost-non existing tax system.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fifty Federalists, with the same general idea of creating a stronger central government, all got together to draw up an entirely new charter, the modern day Constitution. Many debates occurred within the forming of this document, mainly revolving around slaves and specifications regarding the executive powers. The two main opposing members regarding the executive powers was Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton wanted a single man to be elected for life for executive power. The main argument against this was if one man was in charge, the government would be far too similar to a monarchy.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the founding fathers which is now known as the united states of america gained their independence from the british in the late 1770s they were left with the discussion of how to run this new republic. Two of the founding fathers Alexander Hamilton and The future third president Thomas jefferson had their ideas of how the country should be governed which greatly opposed each other. With jefferson wanting the country to cater to the common man mainly poor southern farmers and Hamilton the power to lie within the elite. Which is remarkable since Jefferson was born into the elite and Hamilton started his life from the bottom of the barrel. Thomas Jefferson could not relate to or truly care about the rights of the…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays