“Trump plans to enlist grassroots and Democrats to sell tax plan he will call biggest in history,” from USA Today connects with, “The Federalist,” the ideas of urban over rural, persuasion, updating ideas, and political disputes all work to tie these pieces of writing together.
Many people have feared the urban and wealthy have taken advantage over the poor and rural populations. Americans leaders have tried to please both by coming up with alternative ideas to bring a sense of equality to all people of the region. “Critics say there’s no way to eliminate enough loopholes to compensate for the advantage the wealthy will enjoy from a major rate cut.” (Przybyla, par. 19). This relates to “The Federalist” when it states, “Those who hold and those …show more content…
Forcing them to get people on board by coming up with some sort of persuasion. “Framing the argument by focusing on small businesses and middle-class taxpayers would make it easier to pressure some Democrats to line up behind it…”(Przybyla, par. 22). Przybyla is discussing the problem of convincing democrats to get on board for their plan so, for a reward, Trump says he will focus on small business to convince them to join his plan due to the high number of democrats who own small businesses and are a part of the middle-class. This is much like the Federalist when James Madison describes how people have different views on the New Constitution based on the size of parties against each other, leaving the government to make decisions that will satisfy most of the public's wants and opinions. (Federalist, 352).
In “The Federalist,” Madison discusses how many people have different opinions, having the people make improvements to make the Constitution better to satisfy the majority people. (Federalist, 350). The article talks about how Trump plans on comparing today’s taxes to taxes of the past, focusing on improving what he thinks will improve our America. Along with helping to make people happier in breaking their taxes. (Przybyla, par. 1-3). Both situations are people with power in making decisions to improve their government and help to satisfy their
Many people have feared the urban and wealthy have taken advantage over the poor and rural populations. Americans leaders have tried to please both by coming up with alternative ideas to bring a sense of equality to all people of the region. “Critics say there’s no way to eliminate enough loopholes to compensate for the advantage the wealthy will enjoy from a major rate cut.” (Przybyla, par. 19). This relates to “The Federalist” when it states, “Those who hold and those …show more content…
Forcing them to get people on board by coming up with some sort of persuasion. “Framing the argument by focusing on small businesses and middle-class taxpayers would make it easier to pressure some Democrats to line up behind it…”(Przybyla, par. 22). Przybyla is discussing the problem of convincing democrats to get on board for their plan so, for a reward, Trump says he will focus on small business to convince them to join his plan due to the high number of democrats who own small businesses and are a part of the middle-class. This is much like the Federalist when James Madison describes how people have different views on the New Constitution based on the size of parties against each other, leaving the government to make decisions that will satisfy most of the public's wants and opinions. (Federalist, 352).
In “The Federalist,” Madison discusses how many people have different opinions, having the people make improvements to make the Constitution better to satisfy the majority people. (Federalist, 350). The article talks about how Trump plans on comparing today’s taxes to taxes of the past, focusing on improving what he thinks will improve our America. Along with helping to make people happier in breaking their taxes. (Przybyla, par. 1-3). Both situations are people with power in making decisions to improve their government and help to satisfy their