Federalist 10 Analysis

Improved Essays
Federalist 10 is a series of essays created by James Madison that featured other writers such as Alexander Hamilton and John Jay under the pen name “Publius.” James Madison was a supporter of the United States Constitution and wrote the Federalist in favor of the Constitution. During the time he also became the United States Representatives, and while in Congress drafted the Bill of Rights ("James Madison”). Once the Congress grew strong, James found himself disagreeing with another federalist’s views on a national bank, which entailed the emergence of the Democratic-Republican party ("James Madison"). Primarily due to James point of view that a large one republic faction will never have longevity since a government divided equally protected …show more content…
The dangers of fractions were that if the faction was powerful enough, such as the Republican government, they would sacrifice the rights of the minorities to suit their own selfish interests. Although a pure democracy would mean hearing every single voice and opinion, which is too time confusing and creates confusion. The main idea of the Federalist 10 is the support of a government that establishes basic rights for its citizens and to have a government that does not impose ill will towards its people. The main source of the Federalist 10 is to prove the need for such protection against "the cabals of a few" (Federalist …show more content…
The collective voices of people represented by one person may not be the exact thoughts of all of the people, weighing in on multiple voices that band together brings an opinion from all sides of the table. Madison found the middle ground, where a form of government is stable to have a group large enough to stop one person from overruling yet small enough to "guard against the confusion of a multitude” ("Federalist 10”). This act, in the present day, would result in adding more house members to represent a growing majority, as 435 people to represent three hundred million people is being

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    For the primary sources federalist No.51 and federalist No.10, there's differences and similarities. They also include information that evaluates each other. To know what it is, that is included in the the primary sources it has to be explained.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The battle to ratify the constitution quickly fell into two camps; the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists defended ratification of the constitution as it was written with the Anti-Federalists arguing against ratification for a number of reasons. The battle lines had been drawn, however, the arguments were far from consolidated; especially within the camp of the Anti-Federalists. Additionally, both sides took to media outlets to argue their positions where the written word on the argument of ratification played heavy on the side of the Federalists.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Federalist No. 10 Analysis

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When James Madison outlines the dangers of faction in Federalist No. 10, he defines faction as “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united...by some common...interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens.” 1 This wording is critical for examining both the goals and pivotal ideas of the federalist movement. At first glance, this definition seems to reflect the very real fear of mob uprising. Certainly, it’s tone insinuates an image of mob citizenry diametrically opposed to a smaller elite. However, although this image may have captured this political component of the United States in November 1787, a closer inspection yields a less controversial interpretation. The fact that Madison includes the word “minority” in this definition of faction shifts the focus away from the idea that the majority itself is fearsome and focuses on the dangerous implications of an ideology shared within an insular group. Thus, the framers…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The creation of a republic serves as a control for the effects of factions. Factions emerge when groups of people feel their ideas are not being heard and accounted for in government. Madison describes these groups as having interests against the interests of the whole country. The design of a republic, especially the one created in the Constitution, encourages representatives from various interest groups to have a voice in lawmaking. Therefore, controlling factions is a matter of having elected officials to represent different groups. This is more effective than a direct democracy, in which the people who make up a faction would be able to directly influence government. Representation dilutes factions. Elected officials are less likely to negatively impact legislation due to their identification with factions because it simply is not possible for them to single-handedly pass a law. Given the idea that factions cannot be destroyed without also destroying liberty, the best way to control them is to allow the republican form of government to vote them out. Diversity…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Brutus Anti Federalism

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In Federalist number 10, as has been previously argued in this paper, a republican system of government is able to control any abusive government. Additionally, a republican government is able to control any abusive majority from taking advantage of the rights of the minority. Therefore, through this type of government the “public good and the rights of other citizens” is respected. As mentioned before in Federalist number 51, Madison writes that the individual rights and interest of every citizen is connected to the Constitution.Furthermore, in a republic the citizens surrender their rights to a single government. However, the division of government is a creates a “double security” of the rights of the people. In addition, In Federalist 51, Madison makes the assurance that the rights of everyone would be protected. In brief, despite the rule of the majority, the minority has the assurances that their individual rights to life, liberty and property would be…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Raised by a wealthy family and very well educated, James Madison easily became a dominant figure in politics. “By the 1780’s, James Madison had had his finger in every kind of political pie on the local, state, confederation, and finally national level.” (Roark 190). This makes it easy to understand why Madison was able to break apart different forms of government, comprehend them, and contemplate their advantages and disadvantages. He wrote the Federalist Number 10 in 1787, which addresses the problems…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the failures of the Articles of Confederation, it was clear to the members of the Second Constitutional Convention that serious revisions to our government were necessary to have a prosperous nation. Thus the Constitution, with clear distinctions to the Articles, was drafted. James Madison, often cited as the Father of the Constitution, in conjunction with several other Federalist, like Alexander Hamilton, wrote the Federalist Papers to persuade members of Congress and the states to ratify the document. Noted by history as two of the most influential pieces from the collection, The Federalist Papers, Federalist 10 and Federalist 51 stand out by there clear and persuasive arguments as to why and how a strong national government would protect its citizens. Although Federalist 10 and 51 outline ways in…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the first paper we were assigned, Federalist number 10, James Madison argued that if you wanted a satisfactory economy the Partisan democracy is not the best idea to get that. There are factions or groups of people who are different from each other. The wants and needs of one group can be entirely opposite…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States government was created to have three equal branches, the judicial, executive, and legislative and was helped by the writing of the Constitution by James Madison. Even with these practices established, many Presidents and the government have decided and shaped United States politics by how they interpret and analyze the Constitution. Over the course of United States history all of the different political parties that arise read the Constitution in different ways and believe the meaning to certain parts of the Constitution are different. These conflicts have also caused many power struggles to arise between the President and Congress, typically when the two sides disagree and are controlled by different political parties, resulting…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Federalists party believed that the future of America depended on the decisions that were made only by the government. There was no necessity in taking in mind what the citizens thought. Fedralists wanted a nation similar to the British government. They also thought that the Constitution was enough to outline Americans rights and there was no need for the Bill of rights. In the essay, “The Fears of the Federalists”, the author further explains the way of thinking of this…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Under the pseudonym Publius, James Madison wrote Federalist Paper #10 to try to encourage the state governments to ratify the constitution. In this essay, Madison argued that a Republic, specifically the Republic proposed within the Constitution, would provide the perfect balance between the rights of the citizens and national security. In a direct democracy, there are no checks in place to ensure that the government is functioning as it should. A few dissenters can gather a following and cause problems within the government. This type of government, according to Madison, gives the people too much power and subsequently fails to effectively maintain social order. Madison thinks that the Republic proposed in the Constitution is what America needs. There are enough congressional representatives that a few dissenters will not have a large impact on the government, but there are not so many representatives that the government fails to give the people what they want. The checks and balances put into place on the branches of this government help to ensure that the citizens have rights and a say in the government, but they do not have so much control over the government that it threatens the social order of the…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Federalist Paper number ten was written by James Madison to guard against the issues of factions. In any society there will be factions, people with different ideals, religions, and points of view. In a republic this creates the problem of the mob rule, where only to opinion of the majority matters and the rights of the smaller groups are not protected. This is similar to Federalist Paper number nine in which he addressed the destructive role of a faction in breaking apart the republic. However, Madison expands upon it by providing a way to eliminate the drawbacks of negative factions. This is what birthed the 1st Amendment in order to protect everyone's rights.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Did James Madison get it right in Federalist No 10? In most regards, Madison did get it right, but technology and our two party system have changed the way an Extended Republic works in this country.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 10

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Federalists papers were a series of essays in order to argue for a United States constitution. All 85 essays were written to “Create a More Perfect Union” and ultimately, created a foundation for the United Stated of America to create an initial set of rules that would lead to a formal document called The Constitution. Americans still use The Constitution today to promote a strong government. Federalist No. 10, written by Madison, stands out among the rest of the Federalist Papers because…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    James Madison defines a faction as a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common interest. Madison the author of Federalist Paper argues about the danger of factionalism on liberty. “Madison also characterized the United States as representative democracy rather than a pure democracy (Kramnick199).” Madison defines a faction as a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common interest. Madison advocated for representative government to protect individual liberty from the majority rule. Pure democracy had no cure for the mischiefs of factionalism. Madison argued the problem comes from majority factions gaining popular sovereignty, and using that power to prevent minority factions from participating in gaining power. Madison makes an argument in favor of a larger republic and more centralized government as a way to prevent strong factions. The Federalists believed that the more centralized government would protect individual liberties, and ensure that no faction become too…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays