The Fears Of The Federalists Analysis

Great Essays
Fear of America’s Future
The start of the American nation began with a decision that needed to be made, to continue with a federalist government or a new era of democratic-republican party. Federalist and republicans had two distinct ways they wanted the US government to function. To me the right choice would be republican, because this type of government gave power to the people. Republican party wanted a more limited national government. Rather than having a central government, like the federalist wanted to. But, to really understand which type of government is better we would have to analyze both sides. Like what each party belived in and why.
Federalists party believed that the future of America depended on the decisions that were made only by the government. There was no necessity in taking in mind what the citizens thought. Fedralists wanted a nation similar to the British government. They also thought that the Constitution was enough to outline Americans rights and there was no need for the Bill of rights. In the essay, “The Fears of the Federalists”, the author further explains the way of thinking of this
…show more content…
They also wanted lower taxes on products and spending less money on social programs. The republican party also wanted a farm based nation. Farmers where the backbone of America and where needed to have a successful nation. Thomas Jefferson was the person who strongly belived in tis. He said that in Europe land there is already used for farming or people were not allowed to use it. But, now in America there is much more land to be cultivated and build a great economy. He agrees wit Hamilton that manufacturing is also an important part of the economy, but has said that it should be left in Europe. He rather sends the materials and supply to Europe so it could be manufactured there, rather than bringing them the workmen to America. There would be no need to make a long trip all the way back to

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Federalists and Democratic-Republicans were very different political parties. One example is that Federalists thought the public office should be ruled by educated men who owned property and would protect rights. According to the textbook on page 292 it states, "Public office, Federalists thought, should be held by honest and educated men who own property and would protect everyone’s rights.". Although the Democratic-Republicans didn't like the idea of a few people controlling a strong central government. The textbook states on page 292, "In contrast, the Republicans feared a strong central government controlled by a few people".…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Soon after came to be two new ideas known as political parties which were the Federalist and Anti-Federalist. They fought from day one about everything including significant documents. Federalist and Anti-Federalist had many problems with each other which was known as the great debate. Stated in the new U.S. Constitution there isn’t security in the system for rights of people with ideas different than others or was their security for the liberty of the press (Document 2). The Legislative Branch which makes the laws that…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, the Democratic-Republicans told about how uncentralized the United States would be if they were under the federal during Adams's presidency. Republicans' agreed that they wanted to expand of the U.S. army and navy, undertake on individual rights in the Alien and Sedition Acts, and new taxes and decrease the spending money used to support many of the federal actions that were being done. The main thing the Federalists wanted was a strong federal authority to prevent the extras of popular majorities, while the Democratic-Republicans wanted to take away majority of the national authority so that the people could rule more through state governments and let it be brought to one as a whole…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    They did so by using the document in order to build a stronger argument against the anti-federalists. They believed that having a strong central government would have a positive outcome on the commercial growth that the new country had in store for itself. While the Anti-federalists viewed the country being made up of mostly farmers, the federalists believe it should be a country filled with large varieties of different groups that had different interests and competing groups. The Federalists did emphasize that none of the groups would over power them all and that each group would represent themselves to what they believed was the best in order to be successful. Many people believe that the Federalists were more concerned with making sure that the economic and social changes were seen and dealt with rather than examining the overall transformation that America would undergo over the next couple of years.…

    • 2188 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The battle to ratify the constitution quickly fell into two camps; the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists defended ratification of the constitution as it was written with the Anti-Federalists arguing against ratification for a number of reasons. The battle lines had been drawn, however, the arguments were far from consolidated; especially within the camp of the Anti-Federalists. Additionally, both sides took to media outlets to argue their positions where the written word on the argument of ratification played heavy on the side of the Federalists. Arguments against ratification brought forth by the Anti-Federalists were many and centered primarily on a long standing hostility to a stronger central government.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jefferson Vs Hamilton

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How did the views of Hamilton and Jefferson give birth to political parties? The stumbling block, as always, was the question of power. One group, headed by Hamilton, John Adams and Thomas Pinckney, relied on a strong and vigorous federal government, because they are called "Federalists." They believed that the ideal government should exercise maximum activity in their service to the public good.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists and Democratic-Republicans provided the United States with political parties due to their interpretation of the Constitution, which would eventually evolve and merge the beliefs of the two as time went on. Political parties are important because they play a part in all aspects of the country by helping develop policies, bring new ideas and ensure a variety of choices. The Federalist Party, led by Alexander Hamilton, was one of the first political parties it the United States. The Federalist supported a strong central party with fiscal policies to favor business and banks. The members of this party supported a strong central government, a large peacetime army and navy, and a stable financial system.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Republicans feared the the government would gain too much power while the Federalist craved a strong government to help the nation. Congress passed…

    • 1029 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamiltonians In The 1790s

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The people of the Early Republic of the 1790s had very distinct, opposing views of one another on how the government should operate under a new constitution. These disputes stemmed from the adoption of beliefs from Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, who originally were highly opposed to factions. Their ideas were vastly accepted by two different groups: the Hamiltonians and the Jeffersonians. The many issues they disagreed on were nearly opposite one another, and ultimately lead to the creation of the first party system consisting of the Federalists and Republicans. Initially, these two men were very much against factions.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were two men who wanted change in the political party system. This is where the two new political parties were created, the Federalist party and the Democratic-Republicans. These two new forms of government brought new and different ideas on how to run a federal government. Most candidates of today still follow these ways of thinking, but their ideals are much less extreme, but also these ideas could be applied to some of the problems of today. Alexander Hamilton started his political career as an advisor to Washington during his presidency.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists are who instated the foundation for what our country is. Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had an opinions on how the nation should exist. However, the ideals of each group conflicted on multiple levels. Originally, the first draft for a constitution was established by the Articles of Confederation in 1778 (Kramnick, pg155). This was a document to draft laws for the newly independent states.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Partisan politics in the Early Republic took place because of the need to have a strong central government for the Americas. The draft of the American Constitution was a way that national leaders would form the laws and decisions of the government for the people. Federalist agreed to these terms, and antifederalist were opposed, but lost their fight to the Federalist. The people of early United States lives had changed with the change of politics. Northern people freed black slaves, while in the South, African Americans faced increased laws, and the Indians traditional cultures were attacked.…

    • 1958 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the argument about the ratification of the United States Constitution, both the supporters and the opponents had substantial reasoning for their viewpoints. However, these groups differentiated greatly on what problems were most significant to their arguments. Each group came up with smaller “subgroups” of issues they had with the Constitution or Articles of Confederation. The supporting group of the Constitution was the Federalists, who believed in a strong central government that would better protect and support the new upcoming nation.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    During the period of 1801 through 1817, the conflict of the Democratic-Republican views on the constitution were arguing against the ideas of the Federalists. The two parties believed in completely different ideas of how to interpret the constitution. Although the parties knew they must come to some agreement in how the constitution should be interpreted they both had some very good reasons there party was correct. The Democratic-Republicans believed in interpreting the constitution exactly.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays