Fall Of The Han And Roman Empire

Improved Essays
Two prosperous empires that exceeded in developing trade, creating new inventions, and leaving a legacy behind collapsed. How could such a prosperous empire fall? The western Roman empire and the Han dynasty both collapsed during the classical era for similar and contrasting reasons. The fall of both empires occurred due to internal pressures like epidemic diseases, economic and social issues while external problems like invasions and nomads taking place at the same time. After both empires collapsed, the regions faced change in their culture like the spread of Buddhism and Christianity and adaptation to the previous empires customs. The fall of both empires occurred for similar but contrasting reasons at different times; the Han dynasty …show more content…
These epidemic diseases transpired in the second and third centuries for both the Han and Roman empires. Smallpox and measles were common diseases as well as the bubonic plague that took a tool on the population; in Rome, for example, a smallpox outbreak along with other epidemic diseases and war decreased the population by one-fourth of the previous size. In China the spread of disease occurred at a later time but had similar effects. Additionally, economic issues may have contributed to the fall of the Roman Empire and the Han dynasty. Epidemic disease not only decreased the population but caused a decline in trade. The Han dynasty also faced challenges with a decline in trade; both empires turned towards self-sufficiency. Both empires faced economic pressure involving taxes as well. In China, the government had trouble collecting taxes to support their army, whereas in Rome the taxes began to rise. Roman economic pressure extended; as trade decreased, the value of money went down. Farm fields became overused and started to lack production bringing in poor harvests; the value of gold and silver decreased. However, China faced rebellions from peasant, such as the Yellow …show more content…
An example of an external factor includes both empires dealing with clashes from outside individuals. In China, a semi-peaceful relationship with the nomads always had a chance of dangerous raids. In western Rome, Germanic invasions led to a downfall in most of western Rome. Furthermore, the western Roman empire faced low funds for defense and trouble finding patriotic soldiers. As well, a notable group of invaders in China were the Xiongnu who even created the Sino-Xiongnu Wars between 133 BCE to 89 CE. The Chinese and the Xiongnu fought in an important area of the silk road: the western regions of China. Han ended victoriously, but the win almost demolished their government. Most of the Xiongnu went and joined other nomadic people; some joined the Huns which would invaded Rome. Attila, a warrior-king, formed a powerful military. To begin their attack on Rome, Attila and his army attacked the Germanic peoples causing them to seep into the Roman empire for safety. Little resistance faced Attila and his army and they eventually led to western half of the empire destroyed. The end of imperial authority occurred after general Odoacer removed the last empire in Rome, Romulus Augustulus. Nomadic people built states succeeding the fall of the Roman empire. China went a different route, and after a chaotic state three kingdoms were

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Han dynasty and Roman Empire were two extremely powerful and successful empires. Each had useful government systems that differed from each other. Roads were also a similarity between both the Han Dynasty and Roman Empire. Also, both The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire crashed and ended for similar reasons as well. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire had differing government systems but were related in the fact that they each built and used road systems for trade, and their empires fell because they had the same problems.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China were some of the greatest ruled empires in the world. They both owned huge amounts of land, great economic trade, and impressive military power, but what caused them to fall? Both empires may have had similar ideas, however, their different reasons for their decline in population, economic trade, and failing political systems are what caused them to ultimately fail…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rome and Han China were both very successful, conquest oriented empires. Also, they both had strong governments. Han China’s Wu Ti encouraged peace and Confucianism providing a common value system that unified the empire and made it that much stronger. Rome had a higher emphasis on its military. Rome also didn’t have the value system to cement the peoples of its empire together which is why it proved less durable.…

    • 70 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, the Han and the Roman officials had different views on government, specifically who should participate in it. In Han China, there was a supreme head of state and allowed no citizen involvement. The head of state was called an emperor and he used punishment to control people instead of allowing democracy to affect the government. The Romans allowed an election to occur for the Senate.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dbq Han Dynasty

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Perhaps some of reasons towards the collapsing of the Han Dynasty were out of their control. Around the end of the 1st century CE, the Han Dynasty had it’s last, dark days. It was believed to be seen as manifestation of the anger of Gods. Han emperors were consistently dying one after another. Additional tragedies were taking place during…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rome and Han China at their peaks were the largest and most successful empires the world had yet seen. While Rome centered around the Mediterranean Sea in Europe- from the Roman city-state in central Italy- Han China was based in most of present day China, with the Han homeland located east in the empire. Although in no close contact of each other- the Roman Empire and Han China being separated by thousands of miles- both of these great civilizations grew to great heights and shared many characteristics. While the declines of the Roman Empire and Han China were very similar, both experiencing a collapsing economy, inefficient government, and invasions by other peoples, the differences in their downfalls lie in the core ideals of the empires and how each issue was handled.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Classical empires fell due to external forces such as the Germanic tribes and steppe raiders outside of the Han Dynasty. Invasions occurred. Moral decline was another reason for the decline of Empires. Weakness was created when empires grew comfortable with their lives of luxury. This weakness could not hold up against outside forces.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With no armor for protection , and no one to fight for Rome during invasions , Rome became weak. When the military made these mistakes the Roman Empire…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Han China was a dynasty that lasted from 206 B.C.E and lasted till 220 C.E. Their empire correlated with another empire whom were about five thousand miles away, in the Imperial Romans who lasted from 31 B.C.E to 476 C.E. Both empires had an attribute that made them similar was that they were both imperial empires, affecting the government’s structure making them both centralized. Han China and Imperial Rome were different in a sense that they chose their kings differently. Of course in Chinese culture the mandate of heaven was usually an important factor however during the Han’s time the second king was selected by the first king’s wives who chose from many sons as she tried to take the empire over through her family. While the Imperial Romans went…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han were a family dynasty, while Rome was a republic. In the Han empire, rulers were based on family lineage so once a ruler died, his son would take his place unless the family lost the Mandate of Heaven. The Mandate of Heaven stated that the emperor had to live a certain way to please his gods and citizens and if he failed his throne would be taken away from him and given to another family. The emperor was in charge of choosing officials and government leaders. This was similar to the Mauryan Empire, which was also a family legacy.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    9. Several factors combined to lead to the fall of the Classical Empires. External forces, such as the Germanic tribes and steppe landers outside of the Han dynasty, were jealous of Classical Empire wealth. This led them to invade these empires, which were weakened by being so spread out. Empires also declined because of moral decline, as empires grew comfortable with their lives of luxury.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fall Of Rome Dbq Essay

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Roman Empire was a great and powerful force that influenced many other civilizations after it fell, but before and leading up to its decline it faced many problems. The Empire fell due to the cause of internal and external problems: unstable economics, weakened political and government structure, and ineffective military. These problems show that In document 1, it states that inside the empire the few citizens believed that “the old civilization was worth saving [anymore].” The Roman’s did not feel the pride or morale that they did earlier in the empire, and as they were slowly “excluded from political responsibilities” it led to social inequality and when they could no longer protect themselves there was no chance to rebuild from the…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fall Of Roman Empire Essay

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    Christianity’s control grew greatly and rapidly and this minimized the power of the empire. The church leader’s power increased while the Roman Empire’s power decreased. “Over time, Church leaders became influential and took away power from the emperor.” (Google.com) Some of the Christian’s beliefs and ways of life conflicted with the laws of the empire and the people chose Christian laws over the Empire’s laws. This contributed to the decline of the Roman Empire.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To be specific, the most significant internal factor was the West’s inability to manage it’s economy due to the logistical issues that were associated with its great size. The monstrous size of the Empire itself is what led to its ultimate downfall given the vulnerabilities it caused such as large requirements for military spending and its inability to compete with the East. Smaller contributions to the fall were made by the rise of Christianity and the corruption within the government which in its case furthered the economic downturn as well as the plebeians trust in it’s…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the key components of any successful civilization throughout history is political control. It has proven itself absolutely necessary when it comes to maintaining order in any society. Political organization began to become much more elaborate during the Classical period, offering government leaders more control over the population. We see many different approaches to maintaining this control throughout the classical period civilizations. The Classical period Han and Mauryan dynasty sought and achieved political control through both religion and social hierarchy.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays