The Fairness Doctrine

Great Essays
In recent year’s news coverage have presented information as a form of individual biases to the public, while undermining the opposing viewpoints of others towards the same issue. As a result, viewers are often misinformed about the true face of contentious issues broadcasted throughout news stations. The news that the public perceive as truth is quite often just the point of view of a group of few. For that reason, the fairness doctrine was introduced back in 1949 its purpose was to avoid the use of the media to gain political power through public manipulation. The fairness doctrine dictated that news station owners had to provide balanced information of both sides of an issue, as well as provide the public with information that had importance …show more content…
Therefore, a number of sues were filed to the supreme court against the Federal Communication Commission (FCC), each insisting that their freedom of speech and press had been violated. Consequently, the fairness doctrine was terminated in 1987. However, throughout the years, many have pushed for the reinstatement of the fairness doctrine because it is a law that focuses on limiting the power of broadcasters. In addition, it allowed the television viewers to hear two sides of a story and make their own individual judgment on the matter. The fairness doctrine should be reinstated to regulate news stations and limit its broadcasting powers so that it may provide reliable information as well as remove polarizing viewpoints.
To begin, the fairness doctrine provides balance to an otherwise unrestraint form of public communication. According to the
…show more content…
For example: News stations would have to provide the audience with both sides of a controversial issue. In addition, to avoid the use of personal preference regulations for broadcasters would be implemented and revised by an FCC official. As a result, these actions would allow the audience to make their own individual decisions on the matter and side with the competitor they prefer. The fairness doctrine would eliminate the manipulative tactics used by some news station to increase or decrease the popularity of a government candidate and guarantee a fair

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    He tries to differentiate, this time, between moral philosophy and political philosophy—for example, comprehensive moral conception vs. more properly and specifically political theory. The basis for justice as fairness was homogeneity, and he realized that democratic societies are usually more pluralistic. He speaks about good vs. right and setting aside the good in favour of the right(s); when separated from the good, the right resolves to rights in the plural…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Facts The crucial role of doctrine in public policy making directly correlates to liberalism, conservatism, and egotism as such has fashioned public policy for centuries. While Shafritz and Borick maintain, “All public policy has its origin in an underlying doctrine. This has been true throughout history.” Indeed, then, there is a distinct relationship between doctrine and policy making. According to the text, an example would be, “…In some states convicted murderers are executed; in others, they…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fairness Doesn T Work

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The author is saying that the government shouldn't be controlling fairness in life. He states that people should be able to do it themselves. He is, therefore against the idea of the government stepping in to try and make life fair for everyone. The author simply states it will never work. He clearly believes that fairness is a mindset and that life will truly never be fair. He states in the text people have to work hard to be successful when he says,"It doesn't matter whether you are born with a…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays