The Factors And Causes Of The French Revolution

Improved Essays
“He wanted to be a good king and help his subjects, but he faced enormous debt and rising resentment towards a despotic monarchy . . . Louis lacked sufficient strength of character and decisiveness to combat the influence of court factions or give support to reformers in their efforts to improve France 's government” (qtd. in “Louis XVI). The last king of France, King Louis XVI ruled during the French Revolution until he was eventually overthrown and executed. The French Revolution occurred due to the dissatisfaction among the citizens of France (mostly the peasants) regarding the government and the monarchs. Absolute monarchy was established in France for about a century and was in place before and during the beginning of the French Revolution. …show more content…
The first factor that contributed to the beginning of the French Revolution was the extraordinary debt France collected. In the 17th and early 18th century, France was a powerhouse, dominating Europe at it’s height. But, by 1815 France was in a economic turnwell. Most of the debt was accumulated due to the poor decisions made by the French Monarchy, specifically the cost of war and unfair taxation. Four years prior to the beginning of the French Revolution, another revolution began in the United States. The war did not just end with military and diplomatic triumphs for France, the war also resulted in another million livres which was added to France’s already enormous debt. Another reason France had so much debt was the unfair taxation on the common people or the third estate. Although combined together the first estate (made up of the clergy) and second estate (made up of the nobility) only made up about 2% of the total French population, they held about 35% of the total land …show more content…
Louis XVI was not the ideal king people imagined when they imagined a king. A king was expected to be strong, for a strong king meant a strong government. But instead King Louis XVI is described as the opposite of a strong ruler based on characteristics such as how he “lacked self-confidence and depended on others for advice on how to rule” (qtd. in Nardo). The people saw him as weak and unable to handle a country. As the views of the enlightenment grew popular, absolutism was growing out of favor. The people wanted a new government in place of an absolute monarch. In addition, his lack of self-confidence and weak appearance also affected how decisions were made. When Louis and his advisors tried to put in place a more distributed system of taxing, the nobles resisted. This shows how absolute monarchy was not as a threat or valued as much as it was centuries earlier. The kings who pre-succeeded Louis had unrestricted power as what they said was the law and the people accepted it, but in this situation they’re resisting his power and undermining his authority. Throughout the course of the French Revolution, starting at the event of the bread riots or known as the “flour wars” and the storming of Bastille, the monarch were unable to control riots and protests against the government/monarch. And because they were unable to control riots and protest, the people became stronger and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    French Monarchs had unlimited power and ruled with divine right. Louis XIV (1643-1715) of the House of Bourbon was a powerful king, but not always a good one. He ran France into a huge economic debt which took many years to recover from. Later, Louis XVI (1774-1793) took the throne. During that period, the economic condition of France became weaker than it already was.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the fifteen statements he talked about was, “He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.” (Declaration of Independence). Due to the lack of the king following the laws, it became easier for the colonist to rebel against the crown and the parliament. Even though the colonist believed as themselves to be English gentlemen they still were not offered the same right as the English gentlemen that resided in Britain. The Englishmen who resided in Britain were taxed appropriately and had control over their own homes and did not have to abide by the Quartering Act even though the Englishmen in the colonies had to. Thomas Paine published his pamphlet, Common Sense.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The people of France rebelled because they were suffering from the monarchy. One factor that caused the people of France to join the French Revolution was that their rulers, King Louis XVI and Queen Marie Antoinette, lead them to bankruptcy and made them pay more taxes. In the document it states, “He lived…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Then king George III did not want anything to do with the patriots. The colonies were furious when the king called them out in open rebellion. The king thought that if he would side with the colonist he would not be liked on the Britain. The king worried about him would be peaceful with the colonist they would use that to their advantage. The king worried that if the colonist used their bond to their leverage the king would not hear the end of it from the British colonist.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Consequence of French revaluation did not success because Hannah claimed that civil people did not get complete agreement such as liberties and freedom American revaluation did. It only based op on absolute power like monarch and his feudal that that process created unjust liberties for civil peoples in power. That is why, that revaluation did not get any advantage to change power and to lead new liberties and freedom to…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From 1789 to 1791, the French Revolution wasn 't generally all that progressive. For France itself, beyond any doubt, it mattered an incredible arrangement that feudalism was nullified and that a constitution was set up, and for the short space of time for such substantive changes to be experience and completed. In any case, in 1791, King Louis XVI chose he didn 't care for the progressions, didn 't care for more changes furthermore that he was going to jolt the nation. This choice wound up being an awful one - he fizzled, and for having attempted, the Estates General took a major swing to the progressive heading and had him guillotined the following year. In 1792, the French First Republic was pronounced.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, the French revolution had led France to dictatorship and tens of years’ chaos after that. There was endless struggles between the left wing and the right wing during the French revolution. Although the left has published Declaration of the rights of man, since the political environment was so unstable, that didn't really changed the society into republic. After “The Terror” which killed 40,000 people, Napoleon Bonaparte was crowned as a Emperor, a dictator of France. Then, after Napoleon died, monarchy and republic appeared alternately.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They were not rational because as soon as the Third Estate no longer had a say in government affairs like they did in one point, they revolted against the monarchy killing the king and queen of France. (Horvat) The French people 's decisions were driven more by their emotions than logical and conscious thinking. If the French thought out what was going on and the best way to solve this problem they might have been able save the city and save lives. The French people were not capable of power because when they were in power they were so worried about getting back at the people they believed had harmed them emotionally or physically. So when the people of France got in control of France they started killing .…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How were the colonists going to replace royal authority? Most of the states chose to have the government lose a significant amount of power, as assemblies or the Legislative Branch became more important as it represented the people. People wanted an extension of political freedom. While the state constitutions were being constructed, the Second Continental Congress formed together to create the Articles of Confederation in 1781, the first national constitution which didn’t necessarily have a positive outcome. Due to the fact state governments weren’t comfortable with giving up all their power to the new government, there was a weaker centralized government.…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Running the King’s personal court costed too much money. Another issue was the thousands of people benefitting from the country’s capital because they gave very little in return. King Louis XVI was unable to solve the problems his country was facing. He needed more funding to keep France running, and attempted to pass a law where the nobility had to pay more taxes. The Aristocrats did not approve of this and Involved people from the third estate to denounce the King’s power (“The Economic…

    • 2311 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays