Kant's Moral Explanations

Improved Essays
The Explanations of Morals (Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held)

Morals (mor – als)
Noun; plural

1. a lesson, especially one concerning what is right or prudent, that can be derived from a story, a piece of information or an experience.
2. a person’s standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do.

This essay intends point out the relevant aspects of moral theologians, Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held and to answer the question of the best suited approach in resolving ethical problems and dilemmas.

Kant
I have found that Kant’s theory is the most complicated and confusing of the four. It was only made somewhat clear by the explanation in O’Neill’s reading. Kant’s moral theory was based on motivation.
…show more content…
I believe that the foundation is built within us. I used Aristotle at the base, in that to be the best person that I can be I have to look for characteristics in forming habits that will make me a better person. In that quest, there would be the balancing and putting things into the right proportion to fit in my life so that everything is balanced. The next layer would be Kant’s idea of “good will”. I see this in a sense of the effect of other people aside from myself. I would consider will I cause harm to other people, regardless of how big or how small. While I find that this layer is probably the smallest, because I feel that it is still an important step. Finally, the top layer, I find that Mill has the strongest point in that our actions should be determined by the consequences by determining the maximum utility because it is vital. Every action has a reaction, whether it is good or bad. The outcome is going to happen because an action has to happen. Not to be selfish, I look at myself, others and think of the consequences of my actions. However, the “good” that I decided was to turn the money back in, while I needed it, someone else probably needed it more than I did, or at least I like to tell myself this. Morally, I thought that that was the best choice, not only would I be making someone else happy by returning their money, I also felt happiness, in that I know I made someone’s

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the second chapter of Groundwork For the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant aims to move from the popular moral philosophy in order to establish a metaphysics of morals. Kant 's main opponents in this chapter are the philosophers of self-love. These philosophers argue that everyone is motivated by their rational self-interest. This viewpoint is dangerous to Kant; both supposedly moral acts and immoral acts come from the same source and are therefore indistinguishable. This viewpoint is also dangerous to him as it implies that reason is entirely slave to the passions; we can only act in a certain way if we have an interest in doing so.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    she is doing is wrong, then this person is not exercising good will. Therefore, a person is only exercising good will if he/she knows that what he/ she is doing is the right thing to do and not because he/she is expecting a reward or a positive feeling from this act. Then a person is only exercising good will when he/ she is acting in accordance with her duty.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are three substantial ethical theories in philosophy. Each attempting to prove the others wrong. These theories include: Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics, Mill’s Utilitarianism, and Kant’s Deontological Ethics. In their theories, each thought they had found the answer to finding the truth. Each theory has a hole in it that made others speculate it’s truth.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    mmanuil Kant is one of the most famous figure in the whole history of philosophy. His works inspired many generations of thinkers, some argued for, some against, but always with Kant’s philosophy in their mind. Huge influence of Kant is linked to careful and deliberate analysis of the subjects he explored. Subjects, that are so important in life of every individual, such as moral and ethics. “Grounding for the Metaphysics of Moral” gives perfect insight on Kant’s philosophy.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Utilitarianism: Is It Right or Wrong How We do Things to make us Happy? Utilitarianism is the actions that are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness and wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness, or pain. By being happy, it is the intended pleasure and the absence of pain and by being unhappy, it is the pain and the privation of pleasure (Heydt). There are several varieties of utilitarianism. “Basically, a utilitarian approach to morality implies that no moral act (an act of stealing) or rule (“Keep your promises”) is intrinsically right or wrong.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Keywords: morality, competence, measurement, ethics, behavior, consequence When analysing an abstract concept, such as one affiliated with sympathy and empathy as morality is concerned, it is imperative to have a definition of what morality is. In most dictionary definitions, the common definition for morality considered to be “principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior, in order to conform to social circumstances.” In morality, there are two main components: consequence and purpose. When someone commits a crime, there is a common goal in mind for most criminals. Either, the betterment of the individual, or the betterment of those around them, or both, under normal situations, are the common cause for criminal activity.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this paper about ethical theories and cases I chose to discuss the positions of John Mill and Immanuel Kant, due to their dissimilar views on morality and ethical theories. From the four cases, I chose to apply the two philosopher’s theories to case number two. This case states the dilemma “My full-time (but not live-in) babysitter hinted that she would like to use my address to enroll her daughter in my excellent local public elementary school; her neighborhood school is awful. The alternative is for her to send her daughter to private school, a financial burden but not an impossibility. Should I offer my address?”…

    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lifeboat Dilemma There were several issues involving ethics in The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens case. The case facts are subject to a major ethical issue involving whether it is ethical to kill a man to save three. Some would argue that when given a situation where at least one person will die, we should try to save as many human lives as possible. Others should state that the value of human life is immeasurable. Who are we to decide if one life is equal to another?…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aquinas Vs Kant Essay

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As an rational of human being, I believe human has ability to think and behave in a boundary of morally and ethically right and preferred by majority of others in our society. Each one of us has a priority and best belief that each of us values and these affect us upon making a judgment or action. In my paper, I will investigate on ancient/medieval philosophers, Aristotle and Aquinas, and later modern philosophers, Kant and Mill by comparing the differences and similarities of these thinkers.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Philosophy 2306 Final Paper In The Elements of Moral Philosophy, James and Stuart Rachels discuss the ideas of ethics that a novice should challenge. This book consists of thirteen chapters. First, the author begins with the minimum conception of morality; the following three chapters cover cultural relativism and the connection between morality and religion; the middle chapters, five to twelve, focus on essential ethical theories; and the last chapter describes the author’s perspective of what a satisfactory moral theory should be like.…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What is it that makes a good deed inherently good? Some may say that the goodness of an action is characterized solely by ones motivation to do good, while other’s believe that the end result is all that matters. As human beings we are free to choose our path in life, as well as our beliefs and our actions. This allows us to decide whether we want to act in a way that will cause harm or good. Since we have the free will to decide our course of action to get the results we want, it also comes with the responsibility to choose whether we wish to act ethically.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle and Kant have one major similarity. They both feel that the reasons behind an action are important in determining the moral worth of that action. I will demonstrate the differences between a person of Aristotelian virtue and a person who has Kantian moral worth in the following pages of this paper. I will also argue why Aristotle’s view is correct. The major differences between Aristotle and Kant are how they deem the reasons behind an action to have moral worth.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction Throughout the history of man the question has always come into play regarding how one should behave or conduct themselves during the course of their lives. As a result of this arduous quest, for centuries, several theories have made their way into the hearts and minds of men. Ethics or Moral Philosophy addresses these concerns. The focus of this paper as it relates to ethics will be The Theory of Virtue Ethics.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays