René Descartes And The Existence Of God

Superior Essays
René Descartes was a French philosopher born in 1596. He is often thought of the “Father of Modern Philosophy”. He is also recognized for his work in mathematics, and sciences, where he created a universal method of deductive reasoning. Although he is known for all of theses, his primary field of study was in Philosophy. His most famous quote is “I think, therefore I am” (first written in French “Je pense, donc je suis”). From this quote he developed his reasoning for the existence of God. Throughout his research he discovered two trademark arguments for the existence of God. Descartes formed an ideology that God is perfect, and could never deceive us. This essay will be exploring the importance of God in the creation of life, how we use our …show more content…
He believed that if a demon would try to deceive you into thinking that it exists and you do not, you would have to exist in order for the demon to be able to deceive you. This is where the phrase comes from, if you are a thought creating human being, then you exist in the world. This is thought to be Descartes first principal. Descartes states that there is God as he describes him as “true God, in whom all the treasures of wisdom and the sciences lie hid” (AT VII 53; CSM II 37). Descartes ascertains that God is an all powerful being that created us by stating that if no one is perfect then we are created from the hand of an all powerful perfect creature that placed you on the earth for a reason. In the Third Meditations Descartes formulates the idea of God in order for him to gain a better knowledge of the world around him, and for us to ponder the thought of the all powerful god. Descartes believes that God has left our lives up to us but has created a path for us to follow, that will allow us to “achieve understanding of the fundamental principals of the entire physical universe.” (Cottingham, 48). This idea is known as the ‘Trademark Argument’, because it revolves around the idea that God has placed the idea of himself within …show more content…
Descartes believes that you only believe in God when the idea of him is at the front of the mind. Since our attention wanders it causes the notion of God to disappear when the thought leaves your mind. However, since our attention is not infinite, it is impossible for the thought of God to always be in someone’s mind. He’s uses the metaphor “If I try to keep more than a few objects in my field of vison, some of them are bound to go out of focus” (Cottingham, 70). Descartes describes God’s existence in the mind in two stages: we can move from cognition (more cognition) to scientia (stable knowledge). Descartes believes that “all knowledge depends on God”, meaning that atheist cannot achieve full scientia, due to the thought of God not being present in their mind. He believes that atheist cannot fully comprehend the knowledge of the world, due to the fact that their mind will always wonder back to the doubt of God. Descartes states that “if something is clearly perceived, then no matter who the perceiver is, it is true and does not merely seem or appear to be true” (Seventh Replies: AT VII 511; CSM II 348). However, he believes that an atheist will never progress beyond the individual truths, and therefore will never truly comprehend everything that the world has to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The premises of his argument explicitly draw upon the questions. Moreover, even if there is a supreme being that exists, how can it be proved that he gave us these faculties of will and intellect or that he has any interaction with us or cares about us whatsoever? His argument for God as a reason to believe all that one perceives is truth is more of a statement go faith than it is logic. Proving God’s existence is significant to the meditations because it is the only way to bring back the outside world, outside of the mind. For me, the only veridical foundation Descartes intellectual project finds is that…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (16) The idea of God also cannot be invented by Descartes himself because if he was the inventor, he would have the ability to add or take away anything to the idea but this idea doesn’t permit interference. (17) So the only cause of the idea remaining is that it is innate, having to come within Descartes’s own self. Descartes then uses the causal adequacy principle which claims that any idea that has representative reality must come from a cause that contains at least as much intrinsic reality as there is representative reality in the idea.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As a result of doing so, Descartes was able to rebuild his beliefs on the foundation of this things that he knew for certain was true. Descartes believed that trying to debunk all of his beliefs would be tedious so instead, he concluded that all of this beliefs came from the senses. He also concluded that the senses sometimes deceive us, thus they have a possibility of being false. Descartes does not argue that because we are sometimes fooled by the senses that we are always fooled by them.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It can be seen then that Descartes is sneaking that God is existing on the planet, when he can just really watch that there is a subject, for example, God, and that God-idea is all-powerful, omniscient, self-fundamental, and so on the planet. For it would be distinctive if there were ways we could observationally watch that God existed on the planet. On the off chance that God existed on the planet, then we would have the capacity…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the finality of Descartes' first meditation, the meditator is already facing supreme doubt of all formerly inherited and empirical knowledge and builds an approach towards creating a foundation of doubt on all previous beliefs. Believing to have called all of their beliefs into question, the meditator still demands reason to doubt arithmetic and geometric knowledge – a knowledge that to them feels most intuitive; a “perfect knowledge”. To this, the meditator raises a hypothesis that applies their belief in god: The meditator's detailed argument is as follows: P1. I firmly believe that there is an all-powerful god who created me. P2.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Meditation III of Meditations on First Philosophy, Rene Descartes sets the stage for proving the existence of God. While he begins with the fact that he is a “thing that thinks” with an ability to sense, imagine, doubt, and understand the world around him, Descartes confirms that these ideas exist within him. Since he is certain that he exists and thinks and that he “clearly and distinctly perceives” things, he then concludes that whatever he perceives clearly and distinctly is true. However, he claims that he can only be certain that what he perceives clearly and distinctly is true if he can prove that God is not deceiving him in some way. Therefore, all of his clear and distinct perceptions ultimately come from God.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I do not believe that he means these statements literally. In the third meditation, Descartes talks about the idea of God. After reading this one can come to the conclusion that Descartes does believe there is a God out there even though his religion is not clear. Off of that premise, I came to the conclusion that Descartes does not truly believe we are in a simulation, dream, or are even being tempted by an evil demon. These ideas are not supposed to be taken literally.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, in this essay, I will be looking into the process of two philosopher’s arguments and comparing them. In addition, I will reveal that Locke’s argument against Innateness of the idea of God could be questionable based on his theory of obtaining true knowledge and idea. Rene Descartes asserts the principle of innate idea in the one of his philosophical treatise named “Meditations on First…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In part four of Descartes’ Discourse on Method, the word ‘perfect’ is used numerous times. The excessive use of the word marks its importance in Descartes argument. This part of Descartes work contains Descartes’ thoughts on God and proof of God’s existence. He is exploring the idea of a perfect being, but the word ‘perfect’ seems to take on different meanings throughout the section of Descartes deliberating on what makes a perfect being. Perfect is used in relation to doubt, in relation to God, and in relation to truth.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Descartes has the conclusion that imagination and sensation are the faculties of the mind in a weaker sense that would be intellect and will, also that the nature body is a necessary feature of body.” www.Descartes.com Desecrates which he calls the casual argument, that if the argument is actually contained with an objection that would be formally. Descartes also uses an experiment, and states that God isn’t formally an extended thing, but God would be a thinking thing, and God is an extension of the universe. Desecrates understanding the existence of God.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Meditations of First Philosophy, Descartes explains philosophical meditations written over six days. The Second Meditation concerns the nature of the human mind. Descartes argues that the human mind is better known than the body. A major claim of his is his most famous quote “I think, therefore I am,” meaning a thinking thing, such as himself, can exist. In this essay, I will prove that Descartes’ argument in the Second Meditation for his existence as a thinking thing is convincing.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second, I will present Descartes’s first proof for the existence of God in the third meditation, and in the process present the steps clearly and distinctly, exactly as Descartes understands them. Thus, Descartes cannot be making a mistake when he proves the existence of God. Descartes argument for making mistakes in his third meditation in Meditation on First Philosophy is that human beings can make errors, even though God gave them perfect faculties. These mistakes are caused by our own will or free choice, which has a much broader scope…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays