• Home Page
  • The Existence Of God In Blaise Pascal's The Wager

The Existence Of God In Blaise Pascal's The Wager

Improved Essays
Show More
One either believes that there is a God that exists, or there is not. While there are numerous opinions on God’s existence, Blaise Pascal, author of “The Wager”, believes that there is a God. However, according to Pascal, a French philosopher, we cannot fully comprehend God. “The Wager”, which includes a psychological argument, consists of individuals who are willing to risk their own lives and bet on the existence of God. Essentially, the argument of this work is between philosophy and faith, disputing that humans cannot come close to reaching the realm of the highest belief. Pascal takes the assumptions of those who are non-believers and attempts to persuade them to believe in God by giving them wisdom and knowledge on the subject and showing them that it is foolish to deny God.
In doing so, Pascal uses a subjectivist view of probability in his argument. Towards the beginning of “The Wager”, he compares the understanding of infinity with mathematical practices. For example, there is an infinite amount of numbers, but we don’t know what that infinity number is. Therefore, he is trying to say that we know that God is, but we don’t know what He is exactly. There is no illogicality in knowing that something exists …show more content…
This evaluation of the wager concentrates on the stakes of the will’s happiness. If you believe God exists, and He does, then you will be infinitely happy; however, if He does not exist, then you will owe nothing. Consequently, if you don’t believe God exists, but He does, then you will gain infinite agony; however, if He does not exist, then you will have no debts to pay. Therefore, you have everything to gain and nothing to lose by believing in God, and everything to lose and nothing to gain by not believing in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Richard Swinburne's Theodicy: The Logical And Evidential Problem Of Evil
    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Richard Swinburne's Theodicy: The Logical And Evidential Problem Of Evil

    The evidential problem of evil determines the degree of how much evil must be a part of the evidence of God’s existence. While on the other hand the logical problem of evil is seen through our own eyes. It bares the question whether God is a perfect because of all wrong taking place in the world. Through these two problems it is hard to even imagine that God is perfect. Through Richard Swinburne’s theodicy (theodicy - an attempt to defend God's omnibenevolence in the face of evil) , one comes to find the case that initially escapes the evidential and logical problems…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    William James The Will To Believe Summary
    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    William James The Will To Believe Summary

    With this argument, he justifies and exculpates religious faith, saying that no matter whether a person is freely thinking, if they do not know for certain a belief is false, they can believe in it. To know a belief is false…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pascal's Wager To The Existence Of God Analysis
    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pascal's Wager To The Existence Of God Analysis

    Pascal then adds, “if you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing,” and explains why this is so. There are two options, either you believe in God or you don’t. The first option is if you believe in God and He exists, then you gain an eternity of happiness, but if you are wrong, and he doesn’t exist, you lose nothing. The second option is if you don’t believe in God and he exists, then you lose all, meaning you lose your chance at eternal life; but if he doesn’t exist, you die and lose nothing. One might try to argue that you can lose truth and knowledge if you believe in God, but Pascal explains that the comparison to what you can lose to what you can gain is so minuscule that it will be no worse than a death where you didn’t believe.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Pascal Wager Beliefs
    • 201 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Pascal Wager Beliefs

    Pascal Wager beliefs are if an individual believes in God our heavenly father, you would receive an infinitely great reward and if you did not believe in His existence, then one loses nothing. There are many different ways in which rewards and punishments can be disbursed; they might be handed out on the basis of believing in God the creator and our maker, the basis of good deeds, believing in the Heavenly Father. However, if such rewards and punishments are distributed on the basis of belief in the Christian God, then believing in the Christian God would be in our best interests. According to Wager, the choice between believing and disbelieving in God is a choice between neither losing nor gaining anything.…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analyzing Pascal's Wager Argument
    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Analyzing Pascal's Wager Argument

    Although, there are two criticisms of Pascal's argument, the first refers to the objection philosophers have for treating belief as an action. In other words, they are insisting that an individual cannot decide to believe an idea. Furthermore emphasizing that belief is not and action in which we can control. Perhaps believing in God would make you better off, but that does not automatically force you to believe in that…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Paley's Argument For The Existence Of God
    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Paley's Argument For The Existence Of God

    There is one prevailing question each of us ask ourselves consistently, “Does God exist?” Even though people’s responses are different, nearly all responses are contingent upon one’s beliefs, experiences, and influences. Despite the lack of knowledge, God is known to be an all-loving, all-powerful, and creator of all things in most communities, but those qualities are often questioned by scientists and philosophers. The existence of God was significantly debated among philosophers during the 18th and 19th centuries, however, each esteemed philosopher had a distinct argument explaining their rationale, while criticizing another’s. In this paper, I will analyze William Paley’s, teleological argument, which is the argument for the existence of…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    I Believe In God Rhetorical Analysis
    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I Believe In God Rhetorical Analysis

    Nathaniel Richardson PHIL 3121 Pascal Essay Pascal argues that you should believe in God because if you live a virtuous life and God is real you will have an infinite life in heaven. But if you believe in God and he is not real the only thing you will lose is the pleasures of sin. He believes sin is innate in us as we are born into sin and that is what we ultimately would rather do than live virtuously. On the other if you don’t believe and he is real you will have an infinite life but just in hell.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Cleanthes Argument From Design Analysis
    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Cleanthes Argument From Design Analysis

    “Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion” is a philosophical work written by David Hume. In this book, he proceeds to consult and provide arguments in favor of God’s existence. All of his arguments are supported with premises spoken through the philosophers in his book (this esay on Cleanthes’s argument). In his argument, Cleanthes clams that the universe is a complex machine which has a plethora of ‘natural’ machines. These machines, both human and natural, all have a mans of working towards a common end.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Cosmological Argument
    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Cosmological Argument

    In the middle of the 17th century, thinkers in the enlightenment began to question how belief in the existence of a monotheistic God could be rationally supported. A number of arguments for and against the existence of God emerged at this time, and while the philosophical debate on the existence of God is still in session, the initial dust has settled. At this point in time, it is abundantly clear that a the cosmological argument is untenable at both a metaphysical and empirical level, and that the various versions of the cosmological argument fail to support the existence of God. There is good reason for critically examining the cosmological argument. Theists have made a claim that God exists.…

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Ontological Argument
    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Ontological Argument

    His argument states that God is the most perfect thing possible. After defining god as the greatest conceivable thing he asks “what is greater god as an idea or god as an existing thing?” if it is agreed that existing is always better than not existing god as an existing being is greater than god as an idea, therefore god must exist as if god is just an idea then he is not the most perfect conceivable thing. God must exist by…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast John Searle And Rene Descartes On Dualism
    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare And Contrast John Searle And Rene Descartes On Dualism

    1. Compare and contrast the views of John Searle and Rene Descartes on dualism.is composed of two substances: mind and body. One is physical and one is non-phyical. Rene Descartes views on dualism are known as substance and simple dualism. He believed that reality was composed of two substances, one being the mind which consists of inmaterial thing such as thoughts and emotions.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Argument Of Good Vs. Evil And The Existence Of God
    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Argument Of Good Vs. Evil And The Existence Of God

    The existence of God, a topic discussed in both William Rowe’s and Robin Collins’ papers, but for two very different reasons. The argument of good vs. evil and the existence of an omnipresent, benevolent being such as God is a topic that many find very difficult to find answers for, and will continue to plague mankind for the rest of our existence. After reading the published works of Mr. Collins and Mr. Rowe, one may find it easier to formulate their own opinion. In the publication by Mr. Collins, he addresses the topic of atheism and theism in respect to physics.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Ontological Argument And Pascal's Wager Argument
    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Ontological Argument And Pascal's Wager Argument

    The Ontological Argument and Pascal’s Wager The “Ontological Argument” was created by Saint Anselm; this argument is in support of God’s existence. His argument is one based on observation and reason not on empirical evidence and is spit in to three parts. The parts include why god exists, why god cannot be thought to not exist, and lastly why atheists are able to think that God does not exist. In the first section he begins with a definition of God that he believes everyone would be accepting of and that cannot be disputed.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    The Tension Between Faith And Reason In Thomas Aquinas And Blaise Pascal
    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Tension Between Faith And Reason In Thomas Aquinas And Blaise Pascal

    The presence of a sort of tension between faith and reason has been innate to humans since people first started to question what the true purpose of life is. The existence of this separation could be clearly viewed by looking comparing Athens and Jerusalem, with Athens representing truth through reason and philosophy and Jerusalem representing truth through insights of revelation and purity of soul. Therefore, faith and reason have always posed tension by their proximity and their constantly juxtaposing views. Many view these two concepts as complete opposites, that reason is proven by fact and that faith cannot be proven. However, some philosophers have described how faith and reason can actually come together to come to the truth and how faith can be an extension of the reason that works to reach a higher truth.…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    An Apology For Raymond Sebond Analysis
    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An Apology For Raymond Sebond Analysis

    In Montaigne’s essay An Apology for Raymond Sebond, he defends the work and philosophy of Sebond, which he defines as a “bold and courageous” defense of the Christian religion using natural, human reason, meant to counter atheists (Montaigne 491). Objections arose to this work, and the one Montaigne approaches more thoroughly is that Sebond is wrong overall in his defense of faith, and that faith is not necessary in the acquisition of knowledge about worldly matters (Montaigne 500-501). This argument Montaigne counters with numerous claims, but the one in question is this: man has no knowledge to speak of outside of the divine, as we have not been equipped to judge the world around us. It is worth pointing out that, while Montaigne spends…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings