The Importance Of Integrity In Justice

Improved Essays
Integrity is an important factor in determining a judge’s ability to fulfill their judicial duties. The integrity of a judge relies substantially on their ability to uphold ethical standards, especially in difficult or controversial situations. Depending on the circumstances, some actions qualify as either ethical or unethical. However, there are some actions are always considered unethical regardless of the circumstance. Defining the ethical nature of some common practices helps to maintain a judge’s integrity.
One of the most common unethical practices in any profession is the use of organizational resources for personal gains. Instances of such occurrence are always unethical despite the organization or the setting. As a result, judges
…show more content…
Any actions contrary to this would jeopardize the integrity of the judicial system. In court rulings, impartiality is observed by providing each side an opportunity to present their arguments without placing unlawful limits to them (Shatreet, 2015). In relation, judges are allowed to declare defense or prosecution lawyers in contempt of the court based on unruly behavior. Otherwise, judges have no authority to prevent defense lawyers from presenting valid arguments and evidence to the court. A judge who bans a defense lawyer from speaking in court is acting unlawfully and preventing the establishment of impartiality in the court proceedings. According to the codes of conduct that judges abide by, such an act is unethical. On the same issue, it is notable that a judge who shuts the court down with the intention of preventing a defendant from filing a plea is in violation of both the law and ethical standards. In such an incidence, the judge would be obstructing justice as well as failing to uphold the impartiality requirement of all judicial proceedings.
Other than being impartial, the judicial proceedings should be free of influence by any outside party. The rulings that a court makes should have a firm foundation on the evidence presented in court (Shatreet, 2015). It is for this reason that accepting payments or gifts with the objective of influencing the ruling of a court is both unlawful and unethical. For example, a judge who accepts payments for sending a certain amount of teenagers to a juvenile detention facility is acting unlawfully. Such an act can result in severe punishment for both the judge and the parties offering the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, in this trial, the implications of an elected versus appointed judge can be seen. Judge Horton did the right thing by overturning the conviction of Haywood Patterson, he did so at great risk. Horton, an elected judge, basically ended his career with this move. It is this situation that leads me to believe that judges should be appointed rather than elected. Not every judge, especially when put in a situation like this, would have the integrity to ignore the political ramifications of their decision.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. The Supreme Court decisions in a case affect significantly the entire country’s legal system. Therefore, models of judicial decision making were created to explain the Supreme Court’s behavior and how they influence policies. While the legal, attitudinal and the strategic model are not the only theories of judicial decision making, those constitute the most prevalent hypotheses to explain judicial decisions.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the United States, the court system judicial authority is shared between the levels of government. Today, the Texas Constitution lacks power in people, campaign contributions, lack of minority representation on the bench, perceptions of fairness, and lack of knowledge on the part of the voters. Due to lack of these powers, people distrust the changes that could give the government even more power. Thought the states in United States, the Texas judiciary is among the most complicated and confusing systems. Courts are expected by the country to act in nonpolitical ways, focus on the wishes of the electorate, focus on justice, and give the fair and right judgment for the citizens.…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Book Review Of Just Mercy

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bryan Stevenson is not only an author but a human rights lawyer who founded and currently serves as the Executive Director of the Equal Justice Initiative located in Montgomery, Alabama. The non-profit organization fights against the racial and poverty discrimination that occurs in the United States justice system. Bryan Stevenson has done multiple interviews including one with 60 Minutes with Walter McMillian and made an appearance on TED to talk about the injustice that occurs. Through reading his book, Just Mercy, the reader will see the truth about what it is like to be in the justice system and will not only be shocked by the information that Stevenson has witnessed and experienced firsthand, but will also be appalled with how cases and…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Addressing Diversity in Criminal Justice Policies Dolores Jackson Williams Colorado Technical University Most judges are elected; would it be better to have the judges appointed by a committee? Why or why not? Explain.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These cases show that confessions are not always prompted by internal knowledge or actual guilt, but are sometimes motivated by external influences. If they argue the money = innocence standpoint, use “bad lawyering” instead. The resources of the justice system are often stacked against poor defendants. Matters only become worse when a person is represented by an ineffective, incompetent or overburdened defense lawyer.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal justice system and the concerning ethics are closely knitted. A social contract theory has explained that the criminal justice professionals are basically agents of the government (Chezum, 2016). Every year a large number of criminal justice officials end their careers to the hands of unethical behaviors. It should be noted here that not all unethical behaviors are always illegal and that there are many practitioners who are not necessarily involved in illegal behaviors but are performing activities that are ethically wrong. To understand the ethical issues facing each of the parties involved in the criminal justice system, the first step is to understand the importance of the criminal justice system.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Olaf Dietrich: Case Study

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Once you have chosen a case, begin conducting your research. Your research should cover the following details: 1 The individual or group that had their rights infringed—who were they? Olaf Dietrich had his rights infringed. 2 Which right(s) was infringed? How was the right(s) infringed?…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    California Judges

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Elections are the most democratic way to make judges accountable to the public. Although, competitive elections have many problems and special interest money could corrupt the process. Some states use competitive elections to fill state Supreme Court seats, at least some of the time. Voters then periodically vote on whether to retain these judges. Some states use bipartisan commissions to help choose Supreme Court justice’s judicial appointment.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine, you have lived your life without cause, you are a law abiding citizen, you have never been in trouble, furthermore, your life is established, your married, you have kids, the perfect job, life is excellent. Then one day, by haps, you are stopped, detained, arrested, charged with a crime, not just a crime, a violent crime, a crime that is unspeakable, child molestation! Your life is upside down, your wife, your family, your friends, even your co-workers all look at you differently. However, your innocent, and you protest such, to everyone who is willing to listen to you, however, you cannot get over the fact that no one is listening to your cries, now your life is in the hands of strangers, a prosecutor, defense attorney, judge, and…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dworkin on Judicial Discretion in “Hard Cases” Lu Zhao Boyu (Bozy) | A0127866R In the standard courtroom, one could reasonably expect the judge to be the one responsible for the holding of a case. However, does and should the judge exercise his own discretion when deciding cases? Prominent legal theorist H. L. A. Hart claims that judges do exercise discretion, especially in “hard cases”, where there is no pre-existing or unambiguous rule. To this matter, Hart’s brilliant student Ronald Dworkin offers an alternative theory, which argues that judges do not have discretion and should follow principles instead of rules, even in “hard cases”.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Let me tell you what integrity means me. The integrity of a person is very important to me. It tells me how the person was brought up and the kind of family they come from. I was brought up with a very strong set of morals.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial discretion refers to the powers conferred to a judge in the legal system of a given country to determine the direction of a matter presented to them without the interference of preceding or strict regulations that are established by statutes (Bushway et al. 2012). Judicial discretion is assigned by the legal apparatus within a given jurisdiction, meaning that court decisions may be subject to contest through the utilization of higher powers. Judges are supposed to practice the discretion allowances up to the limit specified by the law, failure to which decisions may be subjected to comprehensive vetting. For instance, the practice of discretion may be void judgement decisions in the event of bias, capricious practices, and the exercising…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, it is debated whether or not judicial corruption is a problem in America. We need to know the facts if we want true justice even if we aren’t victims ourselves, because justice will never be true unless all people can believe in it. To understand the incredible amount of injustice by corruption, let us focus on judges who have been indicted for such a crime, the amount of power judges have, and most importantly why ‘we…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics