The purpose of this exercise is to demonstrate a case that has been recall to identify a major problem facing humanity in the coming decades, which it involves in two arguments that can help or damage the social society. Sometimes, choosing one side can change your lifestyle and others, as it depends the actions or information being applied in the situation. As a matter of fact, the text or teaching that applies to the case, which the case demonstrates that one side refers that “we” should carry forth our existing social habits, which we ignored our surroundings especially the Earth’s atmosphere, as the other side refers a new social habit that can tell the truth about the society’s lifestyle, which allows the humans to get involved with nature.
…show more content…
In which, any person can make a change to the social society, especially the environment, just by expressing their own opinions and ideas. In the past, “we have already seen that freedom realizes itself only by engaging itself in the world”, as creating a movement to expand our perspectives on Earth’s atmosphere/environment, gives “an extent that man’s project toward freedom is embodied for him in definite acts of behavior” (Beauvoir par. 1). In other words, creating a new social habit will free the truth to the community and letting humans know what’s happening to the Earth’s atmosphere, which leads humans to make an action for a better future. Air pollution has made a great impact to the environment, which our actions or getting involved makes humans more powerful to expand our views, so we should have an opportunity to pursuit happiness. The essence of humans exhibits the amount expressions being free, just applying more protest, rally, or demonstrations that keeps each person on task for reduction of air pollution in the …show more content…
Not to mention, it’s the same thing as air pollution, it comes back, which humans should make a modification and reduce, so the society should express more about the problem. In addition, displaying how humans are changing their lifestyle and expanding their expressions about air pollution, which it demonstrates a new social habit to humanity. Therefore, air pollution should not be ignored by the social society, because the freedom of the humans will be disappeared throughout the next generation. If humans created the problem, then they have the freedom or responsibility to save the environment, but if not then more problems are
In which, any person can make a change to the social society, especially the environment, just by expressing their own opinions and ideas. In the past, “we have already seen that freedom realizes itself only by engaging itself in the world”, as creating a movement to expand our perspectives on Earth’s atmosphere/environment, gives “an extent that man’s project toward freedom is embodied for him in definite acts of behavior” (Beauvoir par. 1). In other words, creating a new social habit will free the truth to the community and letting humans know what’s happening to the Earth’s atmosphere, which leads humans to make an action for a better future. Air pollution has made a great impact to the environment, which our actions or getting involved makes humans more powerful to expand our views, so we should have an opportunity to pursuit happiness. The essence of humans exhibits the amount expressions being free, just applying more protest, rally, or demonstrations that keeps each person on task for reduction of air pollution in the …show more content…
Not to mention, it’s the same thing as air pollution, it comes back, which humans should make a modification and reduce, so the society should express more about the problem. In addition, displaying how humans are changing their lifestyle and expanding their expressions about air pollution, which it demonstrates a new social habit to humanity. Therefore, air pollution should not be ignored by the social society, because the freedom of the humans will be disappeared throughout the next generation. If humans created the problem, then they have the freedom or responsibility to save the environment, but if not then more problems are