The Ethical Theory Of Abortion: The Consequences Of Morality

Improved Essays
Despite the horrifying reality linked to abortion, the debate about allowing abortion in a moral society has never ceased. There are various ethical theories that would support abortion based on some arguments. The theory argues that the moral rightness is based on the total good the consequences of a certain activity (Sinnott-Armstrong, 1). According to the consequentialist ethical theory, a consequentialist would first enquire on the consequences allowing the abortion and not allowing abortion. The people who support this theory would want to know the action that would produce the greatest goodness for either the child or the mother. According to the theory, the only thing that matters is whether or not the abortion will produce more or less general value. However, it is not clear whether the consequentialists would support or deny abortion. It is evident that, whenever the carrying out of abortion provides the greatest good, they will support the idea. On the other hand, if abortion does not bring the greatest goodness, …show more content…
This argument is wrong and does not stand strongly to oppose abortion. This theory only provides a highway for decision making based on the argument of greatest good. The consequentialists argue that may argue that an embryo does not have the capacity to feel pain or think therefore; carrying out an abortion is more like any other decision that avoids pregnancy. The theory also provides a decision making procedure for determining what is right or wrong about abortion. Abortion is immoral and it takes the life of an innocent child without a choice. This theory does not uphold the right of life and therefore it cannot be used to support the choices made tin connection to

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Because of the moral standards of society, abortions are becoming a more controversial issue. In this paper, I intend to argue against Don Marquis’s argument that a fetus’ having a potential “future just like ours” is a sufficient statement for claiming that “abortion is, except possibly in rare cases, seriously immoral, that it is in the same category as killing an innocent human being” (p.183). I will first explain Marquis’ “future just like ours” theory which is used to prove his argument that abortion is wrong. While Marquis claims that a future is a natural property that is attached to fetuses and any human beings, I want to argue that there is a difference between future and the natural property. Second, I want to argue against his statement…

    • 1515 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Overall gifts to doctors are not coincided wrong. However a doctor must be cautious when accepting a give for a few different reasons. One the give can be perceived as a bribe for better or favored care over other patients. Second the patient may have an over fondness for the doctor and this can be signs the patient need psychiatric help. And third the gift may leave loved ones of the patient left suffering after a loss.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the essay “Why Abortion is Immoral,” philosopher Don Marquis uses utilitarian principles to argue that “abortion is, except in rare cases, seriously immoral… [and] in the same category as killing an innocent human being” (223). However, he deliberately avoids relating his thesis to abortion in the specific contexts of rape, maternal death, and severe postpartum health complications. Thus, in my analysis of his claim, I plan on adopting Marquis’ utilitarian perspective to evaluate the permissibility of abortion in regard to these delicate scenarios. I will begin my paper by giving a brief summary of “Why Abortion is Immoral.”…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to attempt to give an explanation on which normative theory works in favor with her article and view some actions from a consequentialist utilitarian perspective. Her thesis is: Abortion is sometimes, but not…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this analysis I will show you where I agree and disagree in this topic about abortion whether it’s right or wrong. In the two articles about abortion one written by Jeffrey Reiman and the other article written by Don Marquis who are two well-known philosophers. The main two sides in these article about abortion is…

    • 1030 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Disregarding the mother’s perspective can be compared to getting an arm amputated and declaring the action is immoral from the arms point of view. Abortion differs in each case and no situation is the same, to equate a case to another is immoral and unfair to the parties involved. Marquis writes “Since we do believe that it is wrong to kill defenseless little babies, it is important that a theory of the wrongness of killing easily account for this” although he is using emotional blackmail, it does not stray me from pointing out that embryos are not babies and due to the account of miscarriages and health issues it is not determined they will have a future. Pregnancy is a dangerous time for the mother and fetus and most miscarriages happen between 7 and 12 weeks. Killing is the worst of crimes except in the cases of self-defense.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bailey Washington Mr. Reynolds Philosophy MWF 8:30 1 December 2016 Thomson vs. Hursthouse In this paper I will be comparing and contrasting Thomsons A Defense of Abortion and Hursthouses Virtue Theory and Abortions. Also in my paper I will be sharing my opinion on abortion and which view I agree with.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Permissibility of Abortion: Noonan V. Thompson The topic of abortion has been of much dispute throughout time. Some seeing abortion as the mother’s right to choice, others as murder. Most pro-life supporters argue that fetuses have the right to life and to aborting it is murder. Judith Thompson concedes that fetuses may have the right to life but that only gives the fetus a right to not be unjustly killed.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each day people are confronted with having to solve an ethical dilemma. Some decisions are easier to make than other. How we make our decision is based on our worldview. Throughout this essay, I will be focusing on an ethical dilemma about abortion in a Christian worldview understanding, when being told your unborn child has Down syndrome. 1.…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophical critique on the traditional argument against abortion Robert Bertram - UBC ID: 24675373 Phil 333 (001) - Biomedical Ethics The University of British Columbia The concept of morality in relation to abortion is a significant cause of conflict. These moral ambiguities are put into question by Pope John Paul II’s excerpts on the “unspeakable crime of abortion” with regards to the validity, committed fallacies, and the fetus’s content to the right to life (Paul II, 1995, pg. 1). Paul II's Evangelium Vitae (1995), states that aborting a fetus is the "deliberate and direct killing...of a human being in the initial phase of his or her existence". In the paragraphs to follow, this essay will reconstruct the argument, and analyze Thomson's, and Warren's objection to Paul II's statement.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So the fetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what shall happen in and to her body; everyone would grant that. But surely a person’s right to life is stronger and more stringent than the mother’s right to decide what happens in and to her body, and so outweighs it. So the fetus may not be killed; an abortion may not be performed.” The remainder of her paper is a series of analogies meant to challenge the basic argument mention above.…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They argue that abortion protects the life and choices of mothers but offers zero protection for the children. The abortion law does not provide a specific time frame that abortion can occur. It has been found that after roughly “20 weeks of gestation” the fetus is fully formed and capable of feeling pain (Zagorski). Therefore the question of whether it is morally correct to inflict pain on a fully formed human comes into play It is possible for women to abuse the abortion law by continually choosing to become impregnated and receive multiple abortions rather than using other forms of birth control that are available to them at little or no cost.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is wrong, but no one should be judged for the actions and/or decisions they make. Every human being that breathes, walks, and thinks, can decide what to do with their body. In this paper I agree with Don Marquis’s view of abortion. Abortion is wrong because it deprives the fetus from its future. In other words, abortion is wrong because killing a future child stops it from growing and making a difference to their lives.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I argue that abortion is prima facie morally wrong. Prima facie morally wrong means that the action at first is wrong, however sometimes there are ways to override its wrongness. My primary goal is to demonstrate that abortion, or killing a fetus, is prima facie morally wrong for the same reason that killing an innocent adult human being is morally wrong. I will also explore an objection to my claim and discuss my rational for why it fails to refute my argument. I believe it is prima facie morally wrong to kill an adult human being primarily because it denies them of a “future like ours” (Marquis, 1989).…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most intricate writers on the subject of abortion all believe that whether or not abortion is morally permissible stands or falls on whether or not a fetus is the sort of being whose life it is seriously wrong to end. The purpose of this paper isn’t to address the greater ethics of abortion such as abortion before implantation or abortion when the life of a woman is threatened by a pregnancy; rather I seek to address the general argument for the claim that the overwhelming majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral. I which to investigate further Don Marquis claim that I something is living its wrong to kill it. If this were true people that are dying from disease would believe that they loss a future and all the experiences that they would have had. The second one is that killing alone is wrong because it automatically takes away the greatest loss, which is their life.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays