The Constitution of the United States: Fourth Amendment Rights
During the colonial era the "writs of assistance” was the only method of protection for the people (Hemmens, 2013). As the American Colonies moved forward in the persistence on freedom from irrational examinations and confiscations of property the “English …show more content…
As a document written many years ago, it has been interpreted in different ways, which makes it a living document. “The proper role of the Supreme Court, it is said, is to interpret the Constitution, not rewrite it” (Shaman, 2001). As a living document “We the People” attempt to use the words of the constitution to benefit us, both in a negative and positive manner. Past, present, and the future pose a disadvantage to the written constitution. Attempting to change the Constitution of the United States will take a long process and time, therefore interpreting the constitution makes it easier for the …show more content…
The UK did not believe it was necessary to develop a written constitution. The “laws of a constitutional nature are in fact written down in Acts of Parliament or the law reports of court judgments” (Bogdanor, n.d.). The government of the UK believed that any major event will cause for the constitution to be changed. Although the UK does not have a written constitution, it does have rules of importance, which are contained in statutes and law reports.
By not having a written constitution the United Kingdom has several advantages to the constitution and their rules. No special procedure or events is required to make amendments to the constitution (Bogdanor, n.d.). Any significance pertaining to the constitution can be introduced to the law and the law making process. The UK unwritten constitution has the flexibility, which can be an advantage or a disadvantage to the people. With a written constitution governing the America the Supreme court is