Democracy In The Late Republic

Improved Essays
The roman government, set up after the seventh and final king was assassinated, was structured as a democratic republic that gave elites large amounts of power. This “imperium”, power to command and bestowed by the people was given to the two consuls and praetors after winning an election, was not supreme and the people could take it away. This system on paper looks ideal by giving the people a voice in rome 's politics, but in practice the system was manipulated to favor the patricians and then those with wealth. This brings scholars to question how democratic the rome actually was in the late republic. The late roman republic was predominately non-democratic due to the fact that the tribal and centuriate votes were tilted in the elites favor …show more content…
The tribal assemblies were compromised of thirty-five tribes that all had one vote. One of the two assemblies was the tribal assembly, where every eligible voting citizen could note. The other was the plebeian assembly, which excluded the patricians. The assembly was set up this way so that the decision was the true voice of the people. Although this sounds like a good system, the elites influence was there even if they were not. For example, clients of patrons had to vote for whom their patron told them to and also the elite was such a small group of people, not having their votes didn’t really have a big impact on the decision. The centuriate assembly in contrast to the tribal assembly was based off of economic standing. The voting was also counted differently than in the tribal assembly. The first class had a total of seventy votes and the lowest had one. The voting would also go in order of class and a candidate only had to reach ninety-seven votes for the voting to stop. This means that a good amount of the people voting in the election did not get the opportunity to vote because they were a lower class and not called in before the majority was won. This means that the elite not only influenced the vote, but in most cases were the only vote and by that they silenced the …show more content…
There has been the argument in scholars writing that after Sulla’s changes to the number of officials who could be voted into office so that it lead the elite to be more divided. This lead elections to run down until the lowers levels got a chance to vote. Although the lower classes had less votes they became the decisive votes, so more candidates would find ways to reach the people and gain public favor. Alexander Yakobson suggests in his article Popular Power in the Roman Republic that since the people gained more powers in elections the elite worked harder than before to gain their favor because they no longer had the almost supreme power

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    While larger states desired representation based on population in order to have more power, smaller, less populous states wanted equal representation so that they would not be ruled by the majority. By establishing a bicameral legislature, the founding fathers ensured that the law making process was contemplative and not based on passionate public opinion, thereby preventing majority rule. The judicial review, the power of the Supreme Court to declare acts passed by Congress unconstitutional, also limited the power of the majority as it had the power to override the decision made by a majority in Congress as unconstitutional and prevent a bill from becoming a law. While the framers wished to observe the principle of the peoples’ will, they understood the downfalls of a direct democracy. By creating an Electoral College system, a bicameral legislature and the judicial review process, the…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Republic was a great era in Rome’s history and it was democratic, but how democratic was the Roman Republic? The Roman Republic lasted from 50 B.C. and lasted to 27 B.C.. This helped pave the way for the Roman Empire The Roman Republic was not very democratic because its constitution had little room for the people, the Senate only let patricians in the Senate , and not many people voted, thus it paved the way for the Roman Empire.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Paragraph one intro: Hook: Background: Both the roman and Athenian empires were powerful. They were also stricter in some areas more than others such as their systems of citizenships and the rights and the responsibility that came along with it. Thesis: The Romans had a better system of citizenship than Athens, because of the ability to move up in social class, they allowed more people to become citizens, and they had a better system of government. Paragraph 2 body: Topic sentence: The Romans had a better system of citizenship because they allowed people to move up in social class.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ancient Greece was the very first democracy in history, and their beliefs in Freedom and Liberty for their citizens. The two types of freedoms were political (Governed by their own laws), and individual (do what we want). Freedom is the Central theme associated with democracy. After Greece’s downfall, democracy was not known again till the American Revolution. History is made by Great People.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fall of the Republic was caused not only by one individual’s actions or one event but a culmination of several actions from different individuals and events. Unfortunately, some influenced massively in the Roman society. There Large and quick expansions from Rome’s foundation as an underdeveloped city; creating enormous holes in the governing and political ability in the Senate. While the powerful individuals of Roman mob like the general were jockeyed for position. The Roman life was facing differences far more rapidly than the governing body could manage.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Roman Republic was very democratic and in Document A it states that by telling you that Roman Republic was a democracy. In Document B Professor Fergus Millar tells more about how the Roman was a democracy as he states , “The constitution of the Roman Republic made it a variety of democracy. Every adult male citizen, unless specifically disqualified, had a vote, and there was no formal exclusion of the poor , free slaves could also vote.” Document B states more by telling the most fundamental of all the rights of the people was, however, the fact that they, and they alone could legislate. There were very practical barriers to fair and equitable voting in the popular assemblies said in Document C. “The Roman constitution has three elements ,…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Roman Republic was built on the traditional policy of compromise, devoted to ensure the welfare of the people. In time, the struggle for authority brought fundamental changes to the traditional sentiments of the Republic. As territory expansions brought great wealth into the country, power hungry senators and government officials harbored political ambitions and competed for power. Political treachery and self-interest within the senate and the assemblies gave way to economic turmoil and social unrest. The fight for control under the existing Republic ultimately demanded a conversion toward Empire, but before the transition could take place Rome would have to go through a series of civil war, mob violence and murder.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With every new legacy being born, a new story comes with it. When the Roman Republic had replaced the Roman monarchy, a new system of government had to take its place. The new system consisted of two Consuls, the Senate, the Centuriate…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Only 36.4 percent of voters turned out during the 2014 elections, the lowest overall in seventy years. In 507 B.C. , Cleisthenes, the Athenian leader, introduced a new system of reforms consisting of three groups: the governing body, council of representatives, and the popular courts (History Channel). Greece was the beginning of voting and democracy. In the early 1600’s, as American settlements were later set up in Jamestown, these men started off by conducting an election (Colonial Williamsburg Foundation). As time progressed, these methods and processes tended to evolve, but are not showing much of an improvement nowadays.…

    • 2411 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This suggests that there voting could be unfair and people are just leaving it up to the people on top, but also people are saying its still voting and everyone can do it. So, in the end these two quotes from documents conflict each other but it seems like anyone can vote but…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Early Roman Republic

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Introduction The early Romans were suffered under the rule of Tarquinus Superbus. Therefore, they united their efforts to expel Tarquines (510 BCE) and created a republic, a form of government in which elected official share power (Morey 1901b). However, in the beginning Rome was a aristocratic republic, not a democratic republic, in which only a small group of citizens could sit in public office.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Roman Republic was democratic to a certain extent, but did exclude some things. " Every adult male citizen, unless specifically disqualified, had a vote, and there was no formal exclusion of the poor. Free slaves could also vote...". This shows that adult male citizens even slaves could vote, but women were excluded from having a say in and being able to vote. "…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Though confusion originally existed about the exact date Rome was founded, it is accepted to say that Rome was found in 753 BC and the Roman Republic emerged in 509 BC (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2015). Rome was one of the most prominent states in the Latium region. Much of early Rome’s success should be credited to the major Etruscan help it received— even the name Rome is derived from the Etruscan language. Eventually, Rome encountered circumstances, e.g. not having enough land to accommodate the growing population, which required they expand their territory. Early Roman expansion proved to be remarkably successful, but it did have a negative impact on the politics and economy of the late Roman Republic.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Roman Republic fell for many different reasons. This essay will discuss three of them. Rome won all three of the Punic Wars and they gained power and control of the Mediterranean Sea. With the victories came a lot of “prizes”. Rome became the Roman Republic and it got many slaves and lots of money.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rich Men In Ancient Rome

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Paul Erdkamp’s book, A Companion to the Roman Army he notes, “In Rome, control within the state was and remained in the hands of an urban-based elite of landowners.” (97) This shows that in reality almost all politicians in ancient Rome were also just wealthy patricians who were given the opportunity to lead. Even if the person in Rome with the best political viewpoint and understanding of what a smart and well-organized empire is were a plebian he wouldn’t even be given a chance. This is what the extreme hierarchy of Roman classes looks like.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays