When the mind of an individual thinks about death, it automatically thinks of a life that had to endure pain. Car crashes, murders, and diseases commonly come to our senses of how someone died. Though all deaths are not painful, some end instantly and some, at the time, seem pleasurable. One of these gratifying acts is the second leading cause of preventable death in the United States today, this epidemic is titled obesity and overweight. Some people believe think of obesity as a life choice of an individual and nothing more, though I believe there is more. My reasoning comes from that of health regulations, awareness of prices, and the risks that are being raised. Several health regulations have taken effect so that people know what’s
…show more content…
Nowadays, people would easily choose fast food over a healthy choice in food because it is much less. This argument is used every time for people defending fast food. My response to this debate is that it is in fact not cheaper. My analysis is that people who eat fast food generally eat more throughout the day than someone who eats healthier. This is because fast food doesn’t have all the nutrients needed and only satisfies the mind for that moment, so very quickly the body starts to get hungry again resulting in the victim to eat more. On the other hand, when eating healthier foods the brain is getting the supplements needed resulting in a satisfied stomach for a much longer time than that of a fast food …show more content…
Also, I believe that schools should require a course for students to see the dangers of certain qualities in food because it doesn’t just change the size of a person, but the health and the way an individual thinks. Everyone should be able to be aware of what they are putting into their body without having to search for it. Though big companies such as “Mars” and “McDonald 's” may find it threatening to their business, the well-being of people should matter more. If this cannot be accepted,we should do exactly what we did to cigarettes in 1965. We should put warning labels on the box that covers every possible outcome, such as “Warning, this product may cause a heart attack”. It may seem extreme but is necessary because several reports have announced that more people will die from obesity than hunger this
Nowadays, people would easily choose fast food over a healthy choice in food because it is much less. This argument is used every time for people defending fast food. My response to this debate is that it is in fact not cheaper. My analysis is that people who eat fast food generally eat more throughout the day than someone who eats healthier. This is because fast food doesn’t have all the nutrients needed and only satisfies the mind for that moment, so very quickly the body starts to get hungry again resulting in the victim to eat more. On the other hand, when eating healthier foods the brain is getting the supplements needed resulting in a satisfied stomach for a much longer time than that of a fast food …show more content…
Also, I believe that schools should require a course for students to see the dangers of certain qualities in food because it doesn’t just change the size of a person, but the health and the way an individual thinks. Everyone should be able to be aware of what they are putting into their body without having to search for it. Though big companies such as “Mars” and “McDonald 's” may find it threatening to their business, the well-being of people should matter more. If this cannot be accepted,we should do exactly what we did to cigarettes in 1965. We should put warning labels on the box that covers every possible outcome, such as “Warning, this product may cause a heart attack”. It may seem extreme but is necessary because several reports have announced that more people will die from obesity than hunger this