In addition, the British Parliament during the colonial period was supposedly in the heart of the people, arguing that the members were making decisions that were of use to the future of their citizens. The colonials, much of the poor being pushed to fight by the propaganda and heated rumors by the wealthy merchants, were angered that a king was governing a colony when they were separated by a vast ocean. How would Parliament or King George III know of their best interests with such an extensive distance? Raising questions and asserting their own government after the salutary neglect of the British crown only made the matters worse for the rising empire. In fact, the colonials had already created their own form of government that had similar characteristics from their home country, but that didn’t categorize them as a breed from royal citizens since they began their form of individualism and unique virtues in North America. Furthermore, this process slowly developed and evolved into the will power of an American, independent, stubborn, and unwilling to be oppressed. For that, the enlightenment idea of popular sovereignty became a piece …show more content…
Popular sovereignty was the major role as with John Locke’s thinking, yet that was only one of the many thinkers that influenced the Declaration of Independence. In fact, people always tend to leave out facts in history and alter it to their advantage such as that Thomas Jefferson writing the Declaration of Independence is highly emphasized and that he was an excellent orator but was truthfully a terrible speaker. In the aspect of looking over the views of separation of powers, Voltaire’s argue over divine right, and the analysis of Social Contract can only alleviate the background information that went through the minds of the