Harvey opens the book with an exceedingly apt metaphor ‘Capital is the lifeblood that flows through the body politic’, which sets in motion the idea of capital being a flow, rather than an actual thing. Capital is according to him, continuously in motion and ultimately a dynamic process. Understanding capital flow, and its peculiar ways is paramount in comprehending the …show more content…
Some of his statements are vague and open ended. He fails to clearly define the correlation between the ‘capital surplus absorption problem’ and the barriers of capital, which can lead to an economic crisis. This raises many questions for the reader. Does one see these barriers as a feature of the capital surplus absorption problem? Are the capital surplus problem and their barriers connected? The end of the book leaves the reader feeling lost and ultimately unsure. Harvey fails to determine the future of capitalism as a whole, if it will return to long-term growth or not. His views are varied which leaves the reader