How would you evaluate Paine's essay? I would analyze it by breaking it down one by one and analyzing it and seeing how he uses persuasive techniques and looking around for synonyms and clue words in the passage Does he balance ethos, logos, and pathos? Yes, for pathos he talks about the happy country which America is and the only way t achieve happiness is through war. Logos Paine says “ I thank god that I fear not.…
In his piece, Thomas Paine strongly expresses a persuasive outlook as to why the colonists should fight for their independence. He believes that their willing right to be free shall not be put aside and that their abilities to achieve their freedom may be affected by factors such as God, the British, or even just simply the fact that Paine described the reasoning to get the colonists to fight in such an expressive way. Throughout this piece, Paine’s goal was to persuade the colonists to strive for liberty. To support his argument, Paine utilizes religious beliefs, descriptive language, and the recognition of the counter argument. To begin with, the author points to religious beliefs to demonstrate the relation God has on the colonists…
This is evident even from the heading of Paine's third chapter, 'Thoughts on the Present State of American Affairs.' ; The word 'thoughts' can infer that what follows is simply one man's conception on how things are and how they should be; that they may not necessarily reflect the true views of one nation. In fact, Paine says this in his introductory paragraph, by disclaiming that 'perhaps the sentiments contained in the following pages are not yet sufficiently fashionable to procure them general favor'; (693). By this, he obviously means that his word may not speak for all. In contrast, the Declaration of Independence is a bold and assertive document.…
In summary, being seen as a rebel trying to fight off Britain, or a person seeking their well-deserved independence can be the difference in allies, in trust, and in the time it takes to get what you were originally out for. The point intended here was freedom. Paine openly admits that Britain is a very free society, but with his philosopher-like thinking, he felt like we could refine our Colonies to find our own independence aside from what Britain’s input is. Freedom comes with restraint though. Government agrees sweetly with the simple acts of independence and assures that chaos does not run amuck in society.…
Paine writes, "Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness; the former promotes our happiness POSITIVELY by uniting our affections, the latter NEGATIVELY by restraining our vices" (Paine, 6). Vices only come from man and government decisions derives from man therefore government is evil. In this quote, he demonstrates that only society can fulfill one's desires. To persuade the intended audience, Paine related government to a group of individuals on a remote land depending on one another to survive. On this land, moral virtue would be the rule of law, and no form of government would exist.…
In his writings Paine puts forth a number of reasons to change people’s minds and he does it do effectively because he uses simple and straightforward language that almost all of the colonists understand. He starts his writing by denouncing the idea of a monarchical government by saying that this type of government is not most favorable to liberty because it does not protect the people’s rights and the King creates nothing but a bad government. He then goes on the critize the imperial system, by saying “no island should govern a continent”. When Paine says this he means that it does not make sense for a government that is a sea away and that does not know what issues in the colony to be in control of that land. Finally Paine calls for a new republic to be made so that the colonists can be free and have their rights protected.…
In his pamphlet Common Sense, Thomas Paine gives several arguments to convince the colonist’s on why they should separate from British rule. He is effective on persuading them to do so because of his use of facts, arguments, and common sense. He is also effective because he appeals to his audience by implementing the bible and understandable metaphors in his text. He argued the causes of wanting Independence was British’s cruel treatment, it would be beneficial to the colonies, and America should not be governed by a small country that is miles away.…
Paine says that reconciliation would bring “The ruin of the Continent.” This does not mean that Pain wants America and Britain to forever be at war, but he is saying that in order to bring overall peace, America needs to be its own nation in order to thrive on its own and prevent further fighting. This will prevent emigrants from going to their colony of bad governing and constant fighting. One of his reasons is that the British has a monarchy rule with an unfair kind, and America wants to be a democracy. Paine does not think that the king has the right to tell everyone that “[They] shall make no laws but what [he pleases]” He then states that with all of the fighting and tension, it would be nearly impossible to move forward and the two colonies would eventually just…
Continuously quoting the Bible, Paine makes very strong argument he wrote in the language of the people to undoubtedly get his views across. Colonies declaring independence when they are physically larger than Britain, and are being abused as the King 's subjects…
The document was a brilliant piece that advocated for freedom and independence from England. It provoked images in the common man’s mind of why it was a necessity to gain independence. He uses sharp and clear points to zero in on the flaws and cover-ups composed by the British monarchy. He makes the statement that, “Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; ...our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer” (Paine 153). Paine is specifically voicing that that society is truly uncorrupt, and that every government is in some way shape or form fraudulent.…
He wanted the government to be a democracy, in which every civilian would have a say in the government. Also, he said that another purpose of government is to provide security for the people. Paine thought, if all people acted morally, government would not be necessary. However, since people do not act that way, government would be a necessary evil. Lastly, Paine claims that his view of government is based on the principle, "that the more simple anything is, the less liable it is to be disordered."…
Throughout his pamphlet Paine points out wrong doings of King George III that persuade Americans that the king does not care about the colonies well being, and that the English monarchy will only act in self interest. This rebuts any other arguments that attempt to show that the English will protect the colonies. When the argument of the advantages of monarchy come about, Paine tells that even though the simplicity of monarchy can be seen as an advantage the English constitution is far too complex. Again, he rebuts arguments to do with the king such as: the king is checked on by others. Paine shows that there is a fault in this argument by stating if the king must be monitored than he cannot be trusted, and that if he is being monitored by the people, than the people are better fit for the crown than the king is.…
Paine puts the theoretical attack in Biblical terms, arguing that the monarchy originated in sin. Paine presents his specific problems with the British monarchy with his attack on hereditary succession, and also lists his many grievances with the present king. Another common piece of Paine's argument is that America will eventually be independent. Sometimes he states this as a fact, and other times he seems to be persuading the reader, detailing the extent of the rift separating the colonies and the English king. Since many people were unsure about the idea of a revolution that would sever them from the king, establishing the principle of American independence was an integral part of Paine’s arguments.…
In Common Sense, Thomas Paine denounced the monarchy of Great Britain and argued for a representative democracy. The seeds of American Exceptionalism were planted in these writings, as he encouraged Americans to choose the kind of country…
Paine Starts by calling out tories and questioning them by asking “Why is it that the enemy have left the New England provinces, and made these middle ones the seat of war?” he then answers that question by saying “New england is not infested with tories, we are” This provokes and angers the colonists by telling them that the biggest obstacle they are facing are there own people who are in the british army. This question is answered with such passion by paine that the tories that were reading this would fear what paine is saying as he tells everyone that they are cowards and severely criticizes them, in order to persuade them that what they are doing is wrong and they should support the fight for freedom. He is able to create an example for the colonists to act toward tories and any tories that heard of this could be frightened out of loyalty to britain because they would be abused if they were to obey the rules of great britain. He also asks “If a thief breaks into my house... and to ‘bind me to all cases whatsoever to his absolute will, am I to suffer it?”…