Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation

Improved Essays
When Abraham Lincoln proposed the Emancipation Proclamation, it was more of a noble act of morality than it was a violation of the states rights. Lincoln knew that the best course of action, and the choice with the most moral standing, was freeing the slaves. Or, at least, clearing the way for the emancipation process to begin and gradually abolishing slavery. Even though the reason that Lincoln proposed the proclamation was to get states to return to the Union, he still believed that slavery was wrong. Lincoln knew that it was an evil idea and wanted to make sure that it did not spread any more than it already has. The Proclamation was not a violation of the states rights; slavery was already a violation of morality that all people should …show more content…
Even just the definition alone shows the immorality of this practice. Slavery is not only the result of racism; it also helps fuel racism. It leaves a legacy of discrimination and disadvantage, uses force or threat of force on other human beings, perpetuates the abuse of children, and also increases human unhappiness (¨Ethics and Slavery¨). Slavery is pure evil and no human being should ever have to endure anything like it. Lincoln, although he was a racist and a slave-owner at one point, was well aware of how evil of a concept it is. He thought that he should try and end it from a moral standpoint and also to get on God 's good side. Even though it was something that he was for and used, he knew that abolition was the best option and the one that was right to fight for. Everybody is created equal, so everybody should be treated that way. Lincoln was even quoted with saying, “...All men are created equal, let it be as nearly reachable as we can.” (“Emancipation Proclamation…”). This being said, Abraham Lincoln did not intend for the Proclamation to completely end slavery; he just wanted gradual emancipation. Thus, the document did not actually end slavery. It just changed the basis of the Civil War (“Primary Documents”). It is thought by many that the document was a violation of states rights. This, however, is not accurate. The document was written because, for moral …show more content…
Southerners felt threatened by the Proclamation because it promised to free the slaves in states that did not rejoin the Union. Thus, there have also been paintings that were shown to depict Lincoln as the Devil with the Proclamation at his feet (“The Emancipation Proclamation”). Not all of the responses were negative,though. The Northern abolitionists felt it was a good start to abolitionism. African Americans also had an opinion on it. Frederick Douglass, a black abolitionist, wrote, “To fight against slavery is but a half-hearted business. War for the destruction of liberty must be met with war for the destruction of slavery,” (“Emancipation Proclamation…”). This was saying that in order to have liberty and freedom, one must not have slavery. Those two things are complete opposites and do not go together, at all. The proclamation affected not only the North and SOuth involvement; it affected foreign involvement, also. Britain, along with other nations, considered being on the Confederate side, except they were against slavery. They ended up supporting the Proclamation instead (“The Emancipation Proclamation”). The Emancipation Proclamation was made for the better, despite the varying arguments. Lincoln had good intentions when proposing it and to him, even though it could have lost him the support of the South for the next election, he went through with it anyway.
In spite

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He is correct to say that the South is not alone in its sin against Blacks. The North was indeed responsible as well. However, as Tindall and Shi point out slavery was the main reason for war. They state, “To argue that the Civil War was primarily a defense of liberty and the right of self-government…ignores the actual reasons that southern leaders used in 1860–1861 to justify secession and war” (Tindall and Shi 497). The leaders of the south wanted to keep slavery and they went to war over it.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln did not really feel bad for the slaves. He showed little interest in the pain the blacks were going through, but he publicly expressed that slavery is morally evil. There is evidence to suggest that Lincoln was a racist, and he also has stated that he believes in a “White America.” Lincoln would often argue that the forefathers were against slavery, but they had to put up with because it already existed in American. Lincoln had the same mentality. He thought it was morally wrong and evil, but he had to put up with it because if the slaves were freed there would be a gigantic uproar, that would tear America apart.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln tried to implement multiple antislavery policies to satisfy these states. He was able to rebuke the Fugitive Slave Act, which made slaves as an illegal import. The slaves from the south were given their freedom. Although, this was a good thing Douglass wasn’t satisfied he wanted national emancipation. The republican tried to solve problems without violence at first before such measures.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The North fervently opposed slavery while the South ardently supported it. While it may seem that slavery was always an issue of morality for the North leading up to the Civil War, this was not the…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To sum up, Abraham Lincoln claimed he was against slavery; however, most evidence shows that he benefited slavery. This is because Abraham Lincoln says that he felt like he was assigned to white people. Also, he didn’t want the two races to be united with one another. Plus, he didn’t free every slave; his thoughts on slavery showed that he didn’t want to do much for the US, besides show his opinions. Evidence shows that Abraham Lincoln benefited from slavery and wanted it to be continued.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Save The Union Analysis

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “If I could save the Union by freeing no slaves I would do it, if I could save the Union by freeing all of the slaves I would do it.” Abraham Lincoln’s thinking was that it was bad about slavery, but it was States’ Rights. It was only when the South was using slavery to support its illegal uprising that he functioned to free the slaves. Lincoln abhorred slavery, and always had. He didn't think the Constitution gave the President the power to act on it, but that didn't change his view that slavery was an abomination. Surely, Lincoln did put one thing above the issue of slavery, the protection of the Union, which is the foundation for his speech claiming that if he could protect the Union by allowing slavery he would do it.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stephens also insinuated that the leaders of the union were to be regarded as hypocrites. According to him, the desire of the south to secede should not be met with resistance from the north. If the north really believed in their characterization of the institution of slavery as evil, then they should have absolutely no problem letting go of those in support of slavery. However, he believed the north was content with reaping some of the benefits of slavery while denouncing it in the same breath. He believed if the United States government, the northern states in particular, genuinely believed in the principles they proclaimed, they would have no problem doing away with the states that did not wish to do away with slavery.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although this fact was more shadowed by how worried he was for the effect slavery had on whites (Preston, 2012). For Lincoln the idea of slavery and how it morally changed his fellow man was of more concern than the freedom of the slaves. Prior to the war Lincoln was engaged in trying to end slavery. He voted and advocated against…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln interpreted that the word “men” included Negros. He asserted that we had departed from the ideas of Thomas Jefferson that liberty of one man to another meant nothing “…when in conflict with another man’s right of property”. Instead, we had adopted a new ideology: “make slaves of other people”. Lincoln wanted to re-adopt the Declaration of Independence & its practices to save the union, sparking fear in southern planters that eventually led to secession and the Civil War. Lincoln believed secession to be unconstitutional, and it being his duty to defend the constitution, he was obligated to resort to force to prevent these things from…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Republican Party Formation

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The south also thought that this was going to influence Lincoln’s decisions over the issue, which many were right to believe for his “growing opposition led him to introduce a law that gradually ended slavery” (Smith). Even though, it gained little support the south viewed this as a preview as to what was going to come in the future if they did not surrender to the north. For putting Lincoln, in charge the blame for the start of the war laid on the Republican Party for they imposed conditions that could not be fulfilled. The south felt threatened and thought “the only way to save slavery was to secede” (Dickinson). The South cornered the Union to respond to a greater conflict on top of slavery.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays