Gerrymandering Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
Gerrymandering is the process of altering electoral districts to favor a political party over the other by receiving more votes in that district based on the population demographics and party affiliation. The practice of gerrymandering was created when Governor Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts had enacted a bill that would allow the state to the redistricted in a way that would favor the party he represented, the Democratic-Republican Party, over the Federalists. When the redistricting plan was brought to the press, the term was created using Governor Gerry 's name and the term salamander after one district in Boston appeared to look like a salamander. In recent elections, the United States has not gone through a redistricting process since the last census in 2010. With the next census coming up in 2020, the United States will have to analyze areas where that population has either increased or decreased and redistribute the electoral districts accordingly. Unfortunately, this will result in some form of gerrymandering to sway voting populations for either Democrats or Republicans. After the 2016 elections, it seems as those redistricting had be in favor of the Republicans so they can reclaim areas that they …show more content…
After the 2016 election, it seems gerrymandering will never die off as the practice can be used as a ploy for one political party to overcome the other with an advantage. What I wonder for the future is if we will establish a system of independent or alternative parties on top of our two party system, how will districts look when every party wants a piece of the American electorate. How can all of these parties please a single group of people with differing viewpoints more complex than the political parties themselves? When will we eventually create a system of equal representation and gradually eliminate the use of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Ever wonder why it feels like your vote does not count? The answer can be summed up with one simple word: gerrymandering. But what exactly is gerrymandering? In a nutshell, it is altering the way your votes are added up to affect how the results look at the end of the day. Gerrymandering uses this to wrongly affect how the House of Representatives looks and is therefore destroying our democracy.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Reporter Ronald Brownstein argues that there are four quadrants of Congress. Brownstein adheres to the idea that demographic factors that go beyond region play a powerful role in shaping each party’s representation in the House. The four quadrants of Congress, which include districts that have high levels of racial minorities and of educated whites, districts with high minority levels and low levels of white education, districts that have low minority levels and high white education levels, and districts with low minority levels and low white education, shape the impact of demography on parties in the House. The Democrats’ two greatest demographic strengths are the racial minorities and well-educated whites. While the Democrats drawing their…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    It allows people to think that redistricting is more neutral than it is because people think of geography – as opposed to race, socioeconomic status, or political affiliation -- as a neutral factor, when in fact the geographical location of voters often intersects with various demographic…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Electoral College Dilemma Premise: The U.S. Electoral College voting system needs to be improved upon because whoever earns the majority of total votes cast should be the winner. Definitions: Electoral College-…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Party polarization has a massive effect on voters, congress, and policymaking. Party polarization is the obvious division that exists between parties, specifically Democrats and Republicans, because of the extreme differences of the ideological beliefs of the opposing parties. Increasing party polarization causes many problems for the government. With party members determined to stand behind their own beliefs, it becomes difficult for the two parties to find common ground. The evident discord between Congress members then leads to polarization amongst voters and vice versa.…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For centuries the United States has held many longstanding traditions through history. Most of them were written in the first drafts of the Constitution. However, many policies have changed over the decades, but one of these systems has not changed much since the beginning of America, the Electoral College. Even though the Electoral College system has not undergone any restrictions, it doesn’t mean that it is perfect. There are many ways to refine the process to make it a better fit for the citizens of America.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gerrymandering is unethical and rightfully wrong as it has the opportunity to have an unequal representation of a state (Politics and Policy). Somehow, we see this happen every ten years after a census, yet there are very few who blink an eye at it. Politicians say that it is only for the better good.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Partisan Gerrymandering is the process legislators go to though, by either drawing or changing district boundaries, to make sure one political party has an advantage when it comes to the outcome of an election. This takes away the whole point of being a democratic country where people have the freedom to choose their own government, and representation. Because elections are rigged and peoples votes don't count, legislators makeup district boundaries that only benefit them, and most importantly keep a party chosen by them and only them in a secure route to WIN, without caring about what the voters actually want. Making partisan gerrymandering a big threat to democracy because instead of having the people choose, politicians are choosing for them. Since legislators draw the district…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With redistricting, gerrymandering, cracking, and stacking, how can we choose our representatives? When clearly, they choose us, even before we vote. Redistricting is the process of redrawing electoral districts boundaries, often in response to population changes during census. Every state has its own standard of redistricting that complies with federal requirements to equalize the population, but it creates gerrymandering.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The result of this gerrymandering was an overrepresented Democratic party, inaccurately reflecting the views of our state’s citizens. It’s important to acknowledge that our court’s ruling on this issue has larger implications in the battle against gerrymandering as a whole. Gill v. Whitford 16 U.S. 1161 (2017-18) is another recent case that illustrates why gerrymandering is such a pressing question in our republic. The Republican state legislature in Wisconsin created unfair districts to ensure their majority in 2011. This redistricting resulted in the Wisconsin Republicans obtaining over sixty percent of…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Week article “How to rig elections, the legal way”, The week staff describes how parties gain an advantage by redrawing voting districts. This process of redrawing voting districts to favor one’s political party is considered gerrymandering. It creates districts that are irregularly shaped and is a legal process unless it violates the 1965 voting rights act which makes it illegal to redistrict based off of minority voters. Gerrymandering has been successful in recent years because in 2012 gerrymandered states such as Pennsylvania won 49% of the vote and took 72% of house seats. Redistricting is overseen by whoever controls the state legislature and happens every ten years with data collected from the recent census.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gerrymandering Case Study

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are many solutions to this issue, but the most effective and instantaneously acting one would be to take the power of redrawing district lines entirely out of the hands of the legislature and let an independent nonpartisan commission take over the job (Prokop, 2015). This method would work very well and almost entirely rid Texas of gerrymandering. Other states actually use a similar method to this called ostensible redistricting commissions, but the problem with this is that the politicians appoint the members of the commission. In result, the commissions are not actually independent, and the legislature still holds some control over the situation, essentially making this method ineffective in eliminating partisan gerrymandering. Fortunately, there are several other ways to eliminate gerrymandering, such as the abandonment of the single member plurality system and replacing it with proportional representation.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    All four agreed that since gerrymandering is so successful, it is inevitable for major political parties in the United States to use it. The four preferred to have the process of gerrymandering be fairer, but they were ok with it with it under 2 conditions. The first was for the district lines “to be drawn in a more fair way” (Alberto). In a surprise twist, the second was if the process to gave a slight boost to the party that they most affiliated with. When asked why they thought this, the overall response was “If they’re doing it, then we should be able to do it as well”.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rules, Maxims, Doctrines: The decision of Wesberry has established that federal courts have the jurisdiction to enforce the constitutional requirement that representation should be determined by equally populated districts. This required the legislatures to redraw their districts and continually conduct a census every ten years to perform reapportionment. With this case, cities and suburbs gained a greater voice and the overrepresentation of the rural population decreased; However, gerrymandering still occurs in order for certain districts to gain a majority for a party. Wesberry further established the principle of “one man, one vote” and had districts follow the principle of “equal representation for equal numbers of people.” According to law.Cornell.edu, the case established that “no right is more precious in a free country than that of having a voice in the elections of those who make the laws under which, as good citizens, we must…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A law involving gerrymandering was passed in 1967 that banned multimember districts for fear of racism or an unfair advantage to one party (Yglesias). The argument for gerrymandering is that it balances the seats in Congress, half Republican and half Democrat, providing the minority more of a majority in congress. It also provides politicians the ability to safely guarantee the majority in the House does not change because of…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays