The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Arsenal

Improved Essays
People have different thoughts on if the U.S should retain or dismantle their nuclear arsenal. People that think it should be kept make arguments like how nuclear weapons help keep the U.S safe and how they can be used if there were to be any sort of war. On the contrary People that feel our nuclear weapons should be dismantled say our nuclear weapons cost too much to be kept and they make us seem hostile to other nations. So should the U.S keep its nuclear arsenal? Well there are lots of pros and cons to both sides of this argument. Some say one day nuclear weapons will be our demise, and others say nuclear weapons are the only reason we are still safe from nuclear war today. People that feel we should keep our nuclear arsenal make the arguments of nuclear weapons give the U.S a fear factor, or edge over other nations ( Pros and Cons of Nuclear Weapons Paragraph 5 ). …show more content…
And even if we never go to war with our weapons, Worldwide transgressions and arguments are solved easier because they know of our power. On the other hand people who believe our nuclear weapons should be dismantled state their view that nuclear weapons only cause problems. They make other nations not like us because nuclear weapons are very hostile and have nothing friendly about them and hurt the morals of our nation and others ( Pros and Cons of Nuclear Weapons Paragraph 8 ). North Korea feels the need to make more nuclear weapons because of ours. The United States should retain their nuclear arsenal because they help keep our nation safe, If we go to war we can use them to scare off other nations or worst case scenario, use the weapons, and nuclear weapons are more cost efficient than some may

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear weapons have come into existence within the last decade. They have changed the way wars are fought as they could lead to the total extermination of humanity. These weapons can lead to mutual destruction of nations, which really have caused humans to reevaluate the way they conduct foreign affairs. Eric Schlosser’s article “Today’s nuclear dilemma” is about the nuclear weapons that countries control and what should be done with them. Schlosser argues that the current nuclear weapons active should be disarmed.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Though still after seeing all that destruction and death, people decide to continue to use and test nuclear weapons. This is because nuclear weapons have power and that is what people and nations want power. So, as technology progresses and even more weapons are made, then nuclear weapons will also become more advanced, and people will start using them again and again causing the death of people who have nothing to do with their problems. Nuclear weapons should not be used though, because of all the destruction and terror that they cause. Also the fact that they not only affect the other country or nation you are attacking but they also affect neighboring nations.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    NK’s history of employing missiles, cyber-attacks, criminal activity, SOF and conventional forces proves them as the greatest hybrid threat to the US Military forces. A preemptive strike would be the last option if US were to engage in a war with NK according to strategists. However, the US must not be naive of NK’s capability and willingness to employ its advanced weapon systems and technologies. Reporting indicates that such weapons are dedicated to defeating the US’s precision strike and engagement capabilities. Furthermore, NK reports that they will undoubtedly employ its nuclear weapon systems if they believe its country or the Kim regime were ever at stake.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is what I always hope. We already see the power of the atomic bomb, thus, I think having a nuclear weapons can keep us from going to war. Because not every country can make a nucleus weapons. It can protect us.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I feel that the debate on the nuclear bomb and limits in wartime was overall a weak one. Both sides struggled to get their points across and explain them in a way that someone could understand them. The facts and evidence were present for most of the debate, but the connections to make great points were not. Out of all the points I feel the con side’s claim that there was alternatives to the nuclear bomb was lacking the most. This was due to the fact that whenever they were asked for any supporting evidence or examples of alternatives to the bomb they would shrug the asker off and move on.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nuclear weapons should be reduced because the threat of nuclear winter and even worse risks are too extreme. One of the scariest effects of nuclear weapons is nuclear winter. Nuclear winter is when smoke from nuclear explosions gets so dense that it blocks out the sun. This would block out all of the sunlight causing the earth to turn cold, gray, and dry causing plants and…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Either in the film or in the reality, the risks from nuclear weapons are too big and the use of these weapons is a threat to the humanity. Therefore, using nuclear weapons must be stopped…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The decision to use the atomic bomb posed several significant moral dilemmas for President Harry S. Truman, among these were justifications, alternatives, and complications of the situation. After Teddy Roosevelt 's death, Truman was the new president with a huge decision to make only a few months after. People felt Truman was an insecure man and poorly informed by Roosevelt until his entry to the presidency. It was months later that he learned of America’s dark secret, the Manhattan Project. There were presumably three possible alternatives available to Americans to avoid using the atomic bomb such as invasion, increasing bomb threats and blockades of Japan, and negotiating peace.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Perry

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As it stated in the article, “unlike the original Cold War, this time there is a world of busy fanatics excited by the prospect of a planet with more bombs—people who have already demonstrated the desire to slaughter many thousands of people in an instant, and are zealously pursuing ever more deadly means to do so.” Along with that, people are not as prepared for a nuclear war to happen. I do realize that there is not much you can do if a bomb is dropped in the area you live in, but if everyone was given knowledge about them, it may be able to save some people in the surrounding areas. Many years ago, nuclear wars were a common topic of movies and people thought about the threat of them everyday, but that is the other difference from the times of the Cold War, “Americans no longer think about the threat everyday.” I thought this article was very interesting because I had never thought about how others may look at nuclear weapons, especially those that had experienced wars where these types of weapons were used in the past, like Bill…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He begins to prove this point by giving example of the various countries that possess nuclear weapons and are continuing modernize them. The US, being the endorser for the abolishment, has a modernization program that will develop to cost one trillion dollars for the next 30 years. Moreover, Russia, China, North Korea and many more countries are also continuing to develop their machinery. Russia and North Korea boosted the size of their nuclear arsenal by stating how they can turn the USA into “radioactive dust”. Therefore, nuclear weapons are also seen as a symbol of national…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some Actions are taking place today with Nuclear threats between the U.S. and North Korea. As Ms. Hanham said in an interview from Monterey California, “The frustration I have is borne out of how casually we've started to talk about [nuclear weapons] as tools”. This is a complete different time and due to advancements, people realize bombings are effective but it has been used to fright others since it’s such a powerful resource, if it’s ever needed. However, a terrible threat toward another country should be taken seriously. It was risky to use a bomb like this if other countries had something similar it could have made thing worse but this risk was beneficial and saved the war from an unknowing future, which would have most likely been…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear war has been an ongoing battle since 1945 when the first nuclear bomb was created by Robert Oppenheimer. There are many conflicting viewpoints about nuclear weapons. For instance, the article “A World Free of Nuclear Weapons,” by George P. Shultz and William J. Perry, et. al., is against the “tremendous dangers” that nuclear weapons provoke. In contrary, the article “Why Obama Should Learn to Love the Bomb,” by Jonathan Tepperman, explains why we should “love the bomb”.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In our modern society, there exists this culture of fear that plagues all levels of society. This infection is believed by the masses to only be cured by the notion of security. Security, however, only prompts more fear. In effort to protect our ways of life, people justify various decisions and by these justifications, the commercialization of security is deemed acceptable and has become normalized. Professor Park posits that the Control need is the source of all evil.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The plethora of ways that nuclear weapons can be deployed only help make the other countries that don't have nuclear weapons respect the ones that do even more. The ways that the weapons can be deployed are explained by a nuclear triad, which is the delivery of a strategic nuclear arsenal by…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When the United States first developed the nuclear bomb it had secured its place as the most powerful nation in the world. There was no need for deterrence back then because nobody else had acquired nuclear bombs yet. Essentially the United States could get away with nuking anyone without any major consequences and without sending any ground troops. Only a few planes were needed to do the trick. It was only a matter of time before another state pursued the same technology and within a few years, the USSR had succeeded.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays