Genocide Against Native Americans

Superior Essays
Sociological Investigation Number Two I strongly agree that the European Americans committed genocide against the Native Americans. The characteristics of the violence faced by Native Americans fits many facets of the definition of genocide. According to Article Six of the Rome Statutes, genocide consists of attempting to kill members of a group, causing serious bodily harm, trying to bring about a group’s destruction, preventing births, and forcibly relocating a group. For an event to be considered genocide, there must also be a government policy in place that advocated for the massacre (Anderson 2014, pg. 6-7). European Americans are guilty of all of these acts by attempting to kill entire Native populations, not sparing women and children, …show more content…
Covered in Article Seven, crimes against humanity covers some components of the genocide, such as causing serious bodily harm or killing members of a group through torture, sexual slavery, and food deprivation. The definition of crimes against humanity also includes the forced relocation of a group, coined as ethnic cleansing (Anderson 2014, pg. 7). However, unlike the definition of genocide, crimes against humanity fails to account for the efforts of the European Americans to exterminate the Native American population. Rather, it seems to suggest that the European Americans wanted the Natives to simply assimilate, rather than be destroyed. In order for this definition to fit the acts committed against the Native Americans, it would need to cover the prevention of births and the attempt to bring about a group’s destruction, rather than merely describing attacks directed at the group. Another attempt to describe the treatment of Native Americans is by labeling the acts as war crimes. Contained in Article Eight, the definition of war crimes asserts that a nation is not held liable if a military organization commits acts that fit the definition of genocide without sanction from the national government (Anderson 2014, pg. 8). However, there are cases where the President of the United States condoned genocidal treatment of the Native Americans by the …show more content…
There is a large disparity in resources between white Americans and Native Americans. This is due to the isolation of Native Americans on government-designated reservations. As the tribes were forced into signing treaties with the United States government, they were forcibly removed from their land. Being isolated on the reservations has prevented the Natives from interacting with the rest of society, constraining their access to valuable resources. Today, Native Americans have the lowest average income of any other ethnic group in America and they are overrepresented in the lower class. As of 2007, there is a $25,000 gap between the average income of the white American and Native American populations. This is because they are limited in the amount of job opportunities available to them. Native Americans living on reservations are more likely to do blue collar work or have government provided jobs, both of which are low paying. Only 25% of Native Americans hold management or professional work positions. They are also less likely to graduate from high school and college than the rest of the United States population, which further constricts their availability of well-paying jobs. Native Americans live on average four years shorter than white Americans. This can be accounted for by their restricted access to healthcare when compared to whites. 31% of Natives do not have

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    As time rolls on Native Americans still live far below the American standard. Some third world countries are better off economic and living wise compared to most Indian reservations. Rates such as suicide, unemployment, poverty, drop out, crime, and drug abuse are all lead by the Native American people. The even scarier thought is that Native Americans only account for 2% of the entire U.S. population (CDC’s Office…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rwanda Genocide Analysis

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the words of Raphael Lemkin, genocide is a, “systematic, planned replacement of the culture of the oppressed with the culture of the oppressor.” It refers to violent crimes committed against national, ethnical, racial or religious groups with the intent to destroy the existence of the group. 1 Lemkin first introduces the word to describe the Nazis murder and destruction of the Jews. Since the Holocaust, genocide has been established to be an international crime, which enforced nations “undertake to prevent and punish.” Although the push for laws and punishments to be made for genocide have been made, preventing genocide remains a challenge that nation and individuals continue to face. 2 Years of ethnic hostility brings Rwanda to a downfall.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He does so using the definitions formed by Raphael Lemkin and the United Nations. The Native Americans were killed, raped, kidnapped, stolen from, and treated like animals (Lindsay 165, 210). All of this was done by Euro-American settlers to bring about their extermination (Lindsay 165). The Euro-Americans’ intent to kill, desire to extirpate anything or anyone associated with natives, and need to prevent Indians from working demonstrate the genocide Native peoples faced. Although this genocide was one of the most horrific events in American history, the Euro-Americans failed to completely exterminate the Native Americans.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Native American Genocide

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages

    "Any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, [political] or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical [as well as social] destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.” (UN.org, 1) When comparing the acts of colonial settlers against Native Americans as genocide by the 1948 definition standards, settlers provided provable intent in the ethnic cleansing of the indigenous populations through physical and cultural genocide, efforts to prevent spread of culture through children of Native American descent, as well as the inflicting group conditions meant to bring about social and physical…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Employers offered women about 3 percent less than what they offer to men to fill the same position, with the same job title, the study showed. A Cornell study showed that there were no numbers that could explain a big part of the differences because of discrimination. A study viewed 12,000 MBA’s and realized that after 8 years of being out of school woman make on average 20% less than…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criteria Of A Genocide

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This is why i believe it was a genocide. It fit three criterias, criteria (a), (b), and (e). To be a genocide it must fit two of the following criterias (a) killing members of a group (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dehumanization is the psychological or physical process of degrading the targeted group, making them seem less than human and hence not worthy of humane treatment. Dehumanization can lead to increased violence, human rights violations, war crimes, and genocide. Dehumanization is prevalent in almost every case of genocide, the Holocaust and the Rwandan genocide are two very good examples. Jews in the Holocaust were treated as subhuman and murder so germans would benefit. The Hutus were dehumanized and killed so Tutsis could prove superiority and gain power in Rwanda.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He takes a different spin on this time in history; calling out Europeans for torturing and killing the Native American people for gold and resources. Zinn also points out the beginnings of institutionalized racism in the Americas. He explains that the reason why he expresses this history in this way is because for a long time this genocide has been ignored, and people need to see it for what it is. Zinn states, “…the treatment of heroes (Columbus) and their victims (the Arawaks)…acceptance of conquest and murder in the name of progress…the past is told from the point of view of governments, conquerors…as if they…represent the nation as a whole…” (Zinn 9). Zinn feels that the Europeans who have conquered these lands praise the so-called “heroes” like Columbus and Las Casas in order to justify the genocide that they caused.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At this point, Everell began to see who the true monsters were. Through the story that Magawisca tells him about the Pequot War because it is different from what had learned. The war’s history is misleading because the Puritan historians created a story that benefitted themselves and not the Pequots, the victim of the unfortunate event. The war was said to have been caused by the murders of John Stone, John…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Oil 4 Blood Analysis

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In “Oil 4 Blood” the NDN tape over the mouth symbolizes the labels American society and the government places on them. Anything that is not the staple representation, does not fit their idea of an authentic “Indian”, and therefore not recognized as such. To Waln and many others, allowing the government to define them is unacceptable, and ignores the diversity of Native Americans. This mirrors the way European settlers tried to enforce their definition of gender role, not recognizing the Joyas as part of the culture. The American flag blinds Waln by disguising its wrongs as nationalism.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays