Fossil Fuels And Negative Essay

Decent Essays
Starting in the late 20th century, politicians became increasingly more concerned about the environment. Savante Arrhenius, a Swedish scientist, was the first to hypothesize global warming - the phenomenon of greenhouse gasses warming the earth. Margaret Thatcher was the first politician to bring the topic of global warming into the mainstream political atmosphere. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was established a few years later in 1970 after politicians and scientists realized the harmful effects of fossil fuel consumption on the environment as a byproduct of the energy it creates. Fossil fuels are an attractive option in their respects to be a very solvent resource in terms of their convertibility to energy, transportation, and availability making them extremely efficient and cost effective. The harmful effects of fossil fuels, however, include but are not limited to climate change, oil spills, air pollution, and acid rain. Of the people who have access to electricity and motorized vehicles’, the largest proportion rely on fossil fuels as their primary source of energy.
These effects gave environmentalists a substantial platform to oppose the use of fossil fuels. Environmentalists and
…show more content…
They present many economic and scientific claims that support their ideas in a way that is formulated around specific values. One key argument that fossil fuel advocates make is about the lack of dependency attributed to alternative energies. The reputation of energies that are most affected by this argument are the “green” energy types such as solar, wind, and tidal. Specifically, the argument points out that green energy sources are too unpredictable in the event of changing weather. Robert Wood presents this in his journal, “Tribological Design Constraints of Marine Renewable Energy Systems” as a problem when considering the design of tidal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Deadly Miscalculation Stated in an article about fracking, “Since 2005, more than 100,000 oil and gas wells have been drilled and fracked in the United States” (“Fracking”). About ten years ago, politicians and the EPA in the United States made a monumental decision to drastically reduce coal-fired power plants across the country. Over the next few years, carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere reduced significantly, causing the United States to conclude that global warming is solved. However, this was one of the largest miscalculations the United States has made.…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This week, the reading selections were quite interesting. We have these two authors, Taylor and Epstein, who truly approach the environmental topic in separate ways. On one hand, we have Paul Taylor defending our environment all the way in the article “The Ethics of Respect for Nature”. In this article, Taylor insists that we switch our current perspectives, regarding the environment, to ones that further zoom in on the sake of nature. In fact, Taylor states that “once we reject the claim that humans are superior either in merit or in worth to other living things, we are ready to adopt the attitude of respect” (330).…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because fossil fuels provide billions of dollars to the industry in the United States and Canada, they are still pushing the use of fossil fuels instead of more renewable and environmentally-friendly sources of energy (such as solar or hydroelectric). This use of fossil fuels majorly impacts the air and atmosphere due to the carbon dioxide that is released whenever it is used. Engler refers to a book, “The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History” by Elizabeth Kolbert, which he then analyzes and adds his own points to. One point that he adds is about the threats that the surging growth of carbon dioxide can have on our air, atmosphere, oceans, and even Earth’s biodiversity. The rising acidity in the oceans show that the excess of carbon dioxide is starting to affect our Earth.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fossil fuels make up most of the world’s energy for electricity and fuel to specify crude oil, coal, and natural gas, each one is different in efficiency, availability, and byproducts, and they are same because they are all burn to get to the energy out and the main byproduct is carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas. (Fischer, Douglas) The more carbon dioxide in the faster temperature rises, so has the emission regulate carbon dioxide emission before it out of control. Also the other byproducts are harmful as to the environment as to human. When fossil fuels are burned they release hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide gases and heavy metals leave behind, when burned it release hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide the gases will mix with water in air to create acid rain that could scar or destroy forests, with second most biodiverse forest being in the U.S. it have to be protected.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We learned that fossil fuels emit many greenhouse gases into our atmosphere. Greenhouse gases causes the greenhouse effect which leads to global warming, but it also can cause health issues among people. Also, if Pruitt lower the EPA standards more fossil fuels will be extracted. In class we learned that the extraction of fossil fuels leads to the destruction of environmental habitats. The extraction of fossil fuels can also be costly and have a negative impact on the economy.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    EPA(Environmental Protection Agency) was created by our 37th president, Richard Nixon. The main reason why he created this agency was, he saw how the people of this world, treated their environment and to him it was messup. Since the creation of the EPA, every president after him have at least contribute to what Nixon created. And our former president, Barack Obama, the 44th president have done everything in his power, to reduce the effects of global warming. And told the people “We, the people, still believe that our obligations as Americans are not just to ourselves, but to all posterity.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fracking Vs Natural Gas

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is said by Lynn Zott that Fossil fuel emissions are the leading source of climate-altering greenhouse gases from human activity. Hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking," is a process that the oil and gas industry uses to extract natural gas and oil from shale rock formations buried deep within the Earth. On a global scale, drilling and fracking result in significant greenhouse gas emissions, which threaten the climate on which we depend. (1) In this the point they are trying to make is true, however, when it comes to mass production of an energy source, the only other substitutes are coal, oil, and nuclear energy, all of which also produce greenhouse gas emissions along with other major issues.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fracking can be devastating to the environment and the health of the community that lives near any fracking operation. There have been many cases documented where families that either live near a fracking site or that have even allowed fracking companies to frack on their land, having unusual symptoms that are related back to fracking. These symptoms can be but not limited to fatigue, burning eyes, dermatologic irritation, headaches, upper respiratory problems and many more. Along with these health risks that fracking causes directly, there are other long term harms that fracking contributes to. Air pollution is one of them, when you burn natural gas that is extracted by means of fracking you are releasing greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Author Sandra Steingraber talks about how human’s dependency on fossil fuels is harmful to human’s health. The use of fossil fuels is destroying the Earth and causing new diseases according to Steingraber. “When we light them on fire, we threaten the global ecosystem. When we use them as feedstock’s for making stuff, we create substances—pesticides, solvents, plastics—that can tinker with our subcellular machinery and various signaling pathways that make it run.” (745) Anna Lappé makes a different point in her essay.…

    • 2039 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wind Power Puffery Summary

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Critique of “Wind Power Puffery” In his article, “Wind Power Puffery”, H. Sterling Burnett argues that the advantages of wind power are grossly exaggerated and often cause more harm than good. Burnett, an expert in America on environmental issues, has obtained a Ph.D. in philosophy and a B.A. in cultural anthropology. He mainly writes opinion based articles about current environmental and energy topics and wrote this article to express his opinion on wind generated energy. Supporters of using wind energy in place of burning fossil fuels claim that relying on wind power will decrease air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, which Burnett strongly disagrees with.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fossil fuels (oil, gas, and coal) have been the pillar of our modern society since the Industrial Revolution. There is no further doubt that fossil fuels have a high density of energy and they are the world’s dominant energy source. Even though these non-renewable resources have a variety of applications like fuel for transportation, electricity, plastic, medicine, and chemicals, they are also the largest emitters of carbon dioxide which causes human health and environmental issues. Every economic aspect the United States depends completely on these fossil fuels. An effective way to address the United States’ fossil fuel dependency is by relying on renewable sources of energy, learning how to conserve energy, recycling and reusing products…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argument of Fact Unsustainable fossil fuels have been in controversy in the more recent years. The world’s population is constantly growing and changing with that the need for more energy grows as well. Right now, the main way to fulfill the need of these growing populations come from the use of fossil fuel. One major problem. Fossil fuel is unsustainable, and the need is overcoming the what the earth can create and produce.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    INTRODUCTION Fossil fuels such as oil, coal, and gas have dominated and supplied most of the world’s energy needs for decades. As the dominant energy supply, it is not likely to be eliminated. It is thought to remain persistently in the environment for the next few generations. Fossil fuels have many long term consequences; for starters they are not a renewable source, thus they can deplete faster than they can be renewed. Not only are they exhaustible, they are a major threat to the environment; of particular concern is the threat towards the health of wildlife, ecosystems, environment, and human beings.…

    • 1932 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Importance of Life Life is an incredible thing and can be found in countless different shapes, sizes, and forms. But no matter what form life takes, it always has one characteristic that never changes, and that is it’s always important and is always discussed in the highest regards. In two articles from the Coyote Reader, “To Really Save the planet, Stop Going Green by Mike Tidwell”, and “Topic of Cancer” by Christopher Hitchens, the idea that life is important is exemplified and explained through two very different scenarios. By looking at these two articles, one talking about saving the environment and the effects that will happen if it is not saved, and one talking about a man trying to save his life from the devastating effects of…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article, Global Warming’s Terrifying New Math, which could be found in the Rolling Stones Magazine, the author Bill Mckibben thoroughly outlines the most conventional political thinking about the issue Global Warming and Climate change that civilization and society has failed to resolve . However in order for this issue to be properly resolved, the ways of changing the methods of living and well being of society are going to be strongly impacted. First and foremost , Mckibeen uses three simple numbers s to describe the situation, Firstly, 2.8 C., 565 Gigaton’s, and 2795 Gigaton’s. Secondly, he then discusses in further detail that the fossil-fuel industry is one of the most reckless on earth, and how “there is no other force that is greater, and how these various fossil fuel companies are good for global economies” (Mckibben,2012). Mckibben intuitively exaggerates these two following factors to describe the situation more in depth and with extensive clarity.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays