Drug Pricing Research Paper

Improved Essays
A drug named Daraprim price was raised by 5000%, from $13.50 to $750 per pill. Many cases similar to Daraprim have happened, and a pattern of massive price increase of many life saving drugs by pharmaceutical companies becomes apparent. Expensive drugs had forced patients to make difficult choices, either to cut down basic needs to save money to buy the needed drugs, or to cut down the use of the drugs itself. Americans start blaming drug companies of price gouging and call for drug prices regulation by government. Drug companies, on the other hand, blame health insurance companies for shifting the cost of purchasing drugs to patients. To fix this issue of ridiculous skyrocketing prices on drugs, there must be regulation on the prices of drug …show more content…
However, the real problem recently is that they are jacking the prices, or doing multiple price increase multiple time a year. Johnson & Johnson raised its price on several top-selling drugs, such as Imbruvica for treating leukemia, Invokana for treating diabetes, Xarelto for blood anti-clotting. Other big companies including Amgen, Gilead, Celgene also hike their drugs list prices (Thomas Katie). List prices for drugs increases more than 12% in 2015, more than the increase of past 5 years combined. Many believe the drug cost increase is caused by the non-existent drug price regulations in the US to protect consumers from price gauging by drug companies. In the case like the drug Daraprim, …show more content…
The trend of drug price increase is accelerating and steep. Pharmaceutical companies can charge as much as they want since there is no whatsoever price regulation in the US. Medicare was forbid to negotiate drug prices, and FDA does not take pricing into account for drug approval. On the contrary, Government overseas like Canada, Australia and European countries has implemented some sort of price regulations or price negotiations and also conduct their own evaluation of the therapeutic benefits of the drug. This kind of intervention with drug companies clearly shows in the pricing. Denmark spends only 34 cents for each dollar spent on drug in the US. Lipitor costs $100 for a month supply in the U.S, and only $6 in New Zealand (Islam Ifrad). Skyrocketing drug prices negatively affect the whole healthcare system in the US. To protect their profit margin, hospitals will pass on the cost increase to insurance company, and insurance company will pass on the price hike to consumers by jacking up premiums and copays. Insurance company also restricts drug choice to treat medical conditions, forcing the patient to wait until their condition to get worse before approving a more expensive drug, which by that time treatment will become more costly and less effective. Insured patients, when hit by higher drug cost, will resource to unhealthy measure such as skipping doctor appointment, skipping medication doses. Uninsured patient must pay

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    An example of this is the recent price increase of Daraprim that was priced at $750 by Turing Pharmaceuticals, simply because they could. (Pollack)…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Well the reason for that is they need higher drug prices in order for them to have enough money for research. In some hospitals “ we often must pay deep money for medical research”. They make us pay so much more to help them find the research they need. They deduct us more for research to save others lives. Which you could look at that being a win win situation you get the drug which makes you feel better, and the money you spend on getting that drug can benefit another person because of the research they now can do. They way I look at it is if we didn 't we spend so much money on advertising on drugs then maybe we would be able to lessen the cost of drugs.We used last year 650 million dollars on drugs. Another source even said that prescription drugs are going to be raised 13.6%. The reason is because they lack “ true universal health plan” so because of that they think they can do whatever they want with the money.They aren 't playing with there money smart, and not seeing that advertising drugs if stopped can leave us with more money for much more beneficial things. Last year we spent “ $3.1 billion on advertising prescription drugs directly to consumers in 2012”. So why is it that we are spending more on advertising on drugs then the actually drugs itself? We shouldn 't be spending that much of our money on advertising when they could be spending our money on medical journals and involve…

    • 2270 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main aspect was the lack of competition that makes pharmaceutical companies easily to set up the price and it makes other companies to not compete against each other. These high prices are the result of the built-lack of competition because the U.S. and other governments give pharmaceuticals to have the good amount of time to develop a new drug (Taylor, 2015). The competition in the drug market nonexistent due to reasons that different pharmaceutical companies focus on a specific drug that other companies are not doing. To the pharmaceuticals, it all about making the profit. Without another company competing, that specific drug has more value to the consumer because it 's a necessity and they will be paying for the expensive drug. Other than competition, the articles state about having more bargaining power with the pharmaceutical companies. The United States health care system, allows insurers like Medicare to bargain to set enrollees’ drug prices could serve as something of a stand-in (Taylor, 2015). A way to pay for low-cost drugs, insurers can negotiate with the pharmaceutical on getting discounts where they can bring down the prices or they can even question the value of their drugs and compare to similar drugs. But in order to have more bargaining power, there need to be more drugs available to treat the particular conditions (Taylor, 2015). However, if the drug is really effective and it’s the only pharmaceutical that has the drug, they are unlikely to lower price and could even put a heavier cost. These two methods in the articles described a way to change the regulation of how pharmaceuticals adjust their…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The rise in prices of prescription drugs is an issue that does not seem to be going away…

    • 2472 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical Ethics Of Epipen

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The reason behind it all boils down to intellectual property rights. Meanings they own the rights to create such medicine and no one can either make it quite the same or no one else can make it at all; depends on the patents at hand. For example, with the Epipen; Mylan owns ninety percent of the epinephrine industry which means they control mostly what happens with epinephrine and what not. They 've created a monopoly because they are the deciding factor to drugs like the EpiPen. It 's kind of weird that some competitors to Epipen had recalls or issues after they were released. If you ask me that 's kind of suspicious. If we look deeper into Mylan having these rights to being the main creators of epinephrine we can see why they have created such a distant price. They can say that they are the best and no one can compete blah blah blah. But in the end, the same product they charged two sum odd hundred dollars for is now a ridiculous six hundred plus dollars. This raises a red flag to a deontologist but to the government, it is completely legal and allowed. Makes you wonder if the government cares at all or if they use it as population control knowing not everybody can afford some of the increases. To a deontologist, we would say that it is wrong not only because what is the justification to the price hike…profit? Who benefits from that just the creator…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Wall Street Journal writer, Drew Altman, states that “seventy-six percent of the public blames drug companies for high drug prices – with just ten percent blaming insurers” (Altman). Since the main buyers of medications are private insurers and the federal government, the pricing decision commonly does not consider the patient’s affordability. Pharmaceutical firms such as Medicare are not allowed to discuss prices with manufacturers while the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not consider cost in medication approval at all. Rare value and lack of alternatives influence high costs and “although some price increases have been caused by shortages, others have resulted from a business strategy of buying old neglected drugs and turning them into high-priced ‘specialty drugs’” (Pollack). Because Medicare provides a huge market, it was supposed to save money in reducing administrative costs through negotiating lowering prices with the pharmaceutical industry, but instead has required beneficiaries to purchase insurance from private companies whom are subsidized by the…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The health care industry has no regulations. Which means things like prescription medicine can have extreme price changes over night. Which has happened in recent years. The in article by Tom McKay called “Here 's How Much More the US Spends on Medicine than Everyone Else, in 6 Charts” he mentions how “The world has been repulsed by Martin Shkreli, the Turing Pharmaceuticals head and former hedge fund manager who bought the rights to the anti-protozoal drug Daraprim and raised the price by 5,500% overnight.” (McKay) Then Martin Shkreli claimed that the price increase was to help with the cost of researching. Which is absurd. Could you image if from one day to the next the medicine that you cannot live without had a price increase of 5,500 percent. That should not be allowed to happen to…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Daraprim Case Study

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Therefore, it would make sense she was the stand-in she would offer some answers. Far from the truth. Ms. Retzlaf makes the drug itself and the young company the scapegoat and proved herself unreliable. In turn, the following facts have started helping out patients who rely on Daraprim. Ms. Retzlaf explained the reason for the increase is only 3,000 people need it, they are the only ones with the drug since they bought it the year before, Daraprim is their primary drug and it is their investment opportunity. This was made apparent during questioning when overnight the 60 year old drug went from $13 per pill to the current $750 per pill. She states the cost is justified in order to do research and development for all of the disease that are…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There was a court case to where a pharmaceutical company was giving an origination discounts on product but not to the retail pharmacy. To which the general public will buy their medications from. “They are accusing 22 drug manufacturers of illegally conspiring to fix prices by offering discounts to health maintenance organizations and others but not to retail pharmacies.” “Freudenheim,…

    • 1968 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The high deductibles eventually led to harmful changes for the prescription brands that insured insulin dependent patients. This change, forced people with diabetes to either switch insurances, or pay an outrageous amount of money in order to purchase necessary medicine. Additionally, there are only three companies that manufacture insulin in the United States, according to Forbes.com. By only having a small amount of companies making this essential drug is alarming. Insulin is extremely difficult to produce, however, more companies need to make the drug so the companies do not have an excess of power. The production levels need to increase in order for the prices to stop increasing. All of the problems involving the price of insulin are due to production problems with the vital drug. Not only has this influx wreaked havoc in the pharmaceutical world, but it has also forced insulin dependent people, such as my father to pay whatever price that the insurance company sets for their product. The demand for the drug will only increase. This is true because each year, more and more people get diabetes and become insulin dependent. This shift will lead to even larger problems throughout time. Around ten percent of people in the world have diabetes, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. This equates to around twenty-nine million people worldwide. Out of all the people, over eight million people were unnoticed cases. The instability in the drug’s pricing has gotten so extreme that some insurance companies have retaliated back at the controlling drug companies and are not covering certain insulin brands. A prime example of an insurance company denying needed services, is the brand “CVS Caremark”. This particular company no longer insures the insulin brand “Lantus”. This insulin brand is no longer covered by insurance because a Pharmacy Benefit Manager…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Obama Care Wrong

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The same sentiments should also apply in the case of pharmaceutical price gouging. Indeed, Obamacare should look into reducing drug prices to ensure its survival in the American health care system (Pipes, 29). According to Generic Drug Price Gouging Theory, drug prices in the domestic markets are skyrocketing compared to international markets. For instances, drugs prices in the American market rose 11% higher back in 2011 compared to Canadian, France and Switzerland market, mainly due to American greed and the supply and demand. Resultantly, millions of Americans go without drugs every day due to unaffordable drug prices (Marcovici,…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ever increasing drug prices continue to hinder equitable health care. However, pharmaceutical companies continue to seemingly have unabated control over life-saving medication. This article will examine existing federal and state price gouging laws and determine its efficacy in preventing medication price hikes. From an objective stand point, this article will analyze the benefits and complications related to regulating drug prices on the market in order to make relevant propositions that would help alleviate overwhelming prescription drug…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many studies have been done addressing this issue. According to a study by the General Accounting Office, Americans pay 32% more for similar medications than Canadians. In 2015, a study by the Kaiser Foundation found that the average cost for Cymbalta in the USA was 75% higher than in Canada (Do, 2016). Moreover, in 2012 of the twelve drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for various cancers, eleven of them cost more than $100,000 per year. Overall, cancer drug prices are 20%-40% lower in European countries than in the United States. Not only are the prices of medications for cancer rising but also for other serious conditions such as hepatitis and multiple sclerosis. In fact, people with insurance are being affected by the high cost of prescription medications. This problem is causing insurance companies to limit access to expensive medications resulting in many people not obtaining…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Due to the dramatic price inflation of Daraprim, many people are outraged at the new price. Patients are outraged because of the large amount of money they pay out…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The peer-reviewed article, EpiPen price hikes comes under scrutiny, by Rita Rubin reports the out lash towards the drug company Mylan and CEO of Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Heather Bresch, during recent years due to the increased price of EpiPen. “… since the drug company Mylan acquired EpiPen in 2007, its price has soared more than 400%, to just over US$600.” For many Americans, the fear of losing a loved one simply because they can no longer afford the medication is very real, as according to the Wall Street journal, “some 3.6 billion Americans were prescribed an EpiPen [in 2015].” Pharmaceutical profiteering has always been a concern and continues to increase as “Mylan has a virtual monopoly over the epinephrine auto-injector market”, said Maryland Democrat Elijah Cummings and Jason Chaffetz, a Utah Republican who chairs the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays