The Effects of Censorship in America
Freedom of expression and the struggle it has brought along is as ancient as the history of censorship. The power of voice that it brought to the individual was held in high regards to the moral and political life of the population in the past. The playwright Euripides (480-406 B.C.) defended the true liberty of freed born men-- the right to speak freely. Nevertheless, he was careful to point out that free speak was a choice (Newth). Today, the acquisition of this choice has never been more precious. Using this viewpoint, the reader not only assumes that censorship restrains their “vision” and “voice” of natural rights of speech and expression, but also understands attempts to limit this threat to freedom …show more content…
The rhetorical aspects that the image gives, broadens the use of persuasion to the argument.
The use of logos and ethos are good examples of rhetorical appeals. Since logos deals with the logical aspect of the message, it clearly identifies that the analogy of “blindness” can occur if censorship is enforced by unknown person(s) who have no understanding for the issue at hand.
Whether the audience is aware of the matter being questioned, the fact is censorship causes blindness whether the viewer is aware of it or not. The fact that the person doesn’t want to fail the eye examination test is an example of ethos being used. The idea of a qualified position, invites the viewer to trust the message more and be responsive to it. Hinting to the evidence, those who criticize various art forms are usually the most outspoken on this issue.
With a few differing characteristics on the stake taken, the image provided shows the viewer that those who are shut out from the freedoms they are entitled to, need to be able to express their ideas of censorship. Figure 2 shows us that people should be supported to express their opinions.
The visual cues that are present include a pair of lips that are sewn shut, with the …show more content…
It is important for the viewer to understand that caution to censorship is held in high regards by the organization from this appeal. For kairos, the growth of political and social tensions that have caused limitations to freedom is a reminder of such occurrences such as “hate speech” laws and reactions of governments to filter film content in certain countries. Kairos is used to grab the viewer’s attention to think about the seclusion of many “outrageous” thoughts and perceptions that have been ostracized from the public today.
The two images presented, give the viewpoint that censorship can nullify the senses. These images work in union to warn to the possibility of what censorship in America can do to an individual. Being shut out from things that may be considered “profane” or “immoral” does not necessarily mean it has to be applied to children. Film, the visual arts, and other forms have had dealings with people who have criticized them for not considering those who may be offended by the content presented. The fact is, as long as it stands an artist who wants to express an idea or emotion is free to do whatever they want under the First Amendment. The argument of
Freedom of expression and the struggle it has brought along is as ancient as the history of censorship. The power of voice that it brought to the individual was held in high regards to the moral and political life of the population in the past. The playwright Euripides (480-406 B.C.) defended the true liberty of freed born men-- the right to speak freely. Nevertheless, he was careful to point out that free speak was a choice (Newth). Today, the acquisition of this choice has never been more precious. Using this viewpoint, the reader not only assumes that censorship restrains their “vision” and “voice” of natural rights of speech and expression, but also understands attempts to limit this threat to freedom …show more content…
The rhetorical aspects that the image gives, broadens the use of persuasion to the argument.
The use of logos and ethos are good examples of rhetorical appeals. Since logos deals with the logical aspect of the message, it clearly identifies that the analogy of “blindness” can occur if censorship is enforced by unknown person(s) who have no understanding for the issue at hand.
Whether the audience is aware of the matter being questioned, the fact is censorship causes blindness whether the viewer is aware of it or not. The fact that the person doesn’t want to fail the eye examination test is an example of ethos being used. The idea of a qualified position, invites the viewer to trust the message more and be responsive to it. Hinting to the evidence, those who criticize various art forms are usually the most outspoken on this issue.
With a few differing characteristics on the stake taken, the image provided shows the viewer that those who are shut out from the freedoms they are entitled to, need to be able to express their ideas of censorship. Figure 2 shows us that people should be supported to express their opinions.
The visual cues that are present include a pair of lips that are sewn shut, with the …show more content…
It is important for the viewer to understand that caution to censorship is held in high regards by the organization from this appeal. For kairos, the growth of political and social tensions that have caused limitations to freedom is a reminder of such occurrences such as “hate speech” laws and reactions of governments to filter film content in certain countries. Kairos is used to grab the viewer’s attention to think about the seclusion of many “outrageous” thoughts and perceptions that have been ostracized from the public today.
The two images presented, give the viewpoint that censorship can nullify the senses. These images work in union to warn to the possibility of what censorship in America can do to an individual. Being shut out from things that may be considered “profane” or “immoral” does not necessarily mean it has to be applied to children. Film, the visual arts, and other forms have had dealings with people who have criticized them for not considering those who may be offended by the content presented. The fact is, as long as it stands an artist who wants to express an idea or emotion is free to do whatever they want under the First Amendment. The argument of