Vegetarianism Argument Analysis

Improved Essays
We’ve all heard moral arguments regarding vegetarianism time and time again, but now it is much more then that. All over the media scientists are arguing about the declining state of our planet, and many conclude that this is due to humans. With populations rising, the world is beginning to panic about our effect on the environment and what we can do to reverse our damage. A report published by the United Nations titled Livestock’s Long Shadow, concludes that livestock emerges as one of the top contributors of some of the most significant and serious environmental issues, “locally and globally” ( Steinfeld 283). We should significantly decrease the production of meat because it wastes grain, wastes water, and produces methane.
The amount of
…show more content…
Greenhouse gases are commonly believed to be contributing to the human-induced global warming. According to the article “Want to Have a Real Impact on Climate Change?”, “the #1 contributor of greenhouse gases is not vehicle emissions, but raising livestock”. These greenhouse gases include methane, which is very effective at trapping heat inside our atmosphere. When the heat is trapped, it has no where to go and in time it becomes much hotter creating what is known as the greenhouse effect. Animal agriculture is responsible for a majority of methane in the atmosphere, an astounding 80% (Brummer 2). Methane is produced directly through animal digestion and later indirectly through thousands of acres full of animal feces ("Fight Climate Change by Going Vegan."). Global warming is effecting our planet, and substantially creating a hostile climate, yet we continue to produce livestock. It is only going to get worse as the population increases and in turn the demand for meat will also increase. It is scientifically proven that vegetarians produce substantially small carbon-footprints. In a report published by the Climatic Change, researchers compared the greenhouse gas emissions of 55,000 people and found that the meat-eaters dietary emissions were twice the amount of vegetarians (Scarborough 184). So by increasing vegetarian’s diets and decreasing diets that include meat, the emissions of methane as well as CO2 will decrease. Some may say that there are other causes of global warming and that limiting animal agriculture is far too drastic, but really it is the quickest and most effective way to decrease global warming. According to “Save the Planet; Stop Eating Meat” methane cycles out of the atmosphere in just eight years, as where it takes 100 years to cycle out carbon dioxide (Engelhart and Köhler 7). By reducing methane, in eight years our atmosphere will be cleared of half of all methane

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Meatless Mondays Essay

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    We, in the United States are meant eaters. Today’s news is often filled with the effects and causes of global warming, with the main focus being related to carbon gas (CO2) emissions, reducing oil-based and coal energy usage. By comparison, what is not well known or often reported, is the tremendous impact of raising farm animals, mostly cows and chicken, for food production, the strain on resources, carbon emission, and the corresponding toxic run-off, to name a few. By further investigating the results of these massive farm production undertakings, and how damaging their impact is to the planet as reported by John Vidal in an article published in “The Guardian”, the current way these animals are raised is more recently of interest by politicians, scientists, economists, and the UN alike. Our relationship with animals is severe and must be changed in order to help solve the human and ecological concerns, and solve the problem of the already 1 billion people who do not have enough to eat and the 3 billion more people to feed within 50 years (Vidal).…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this essay, I will consider the topic of vegetarianism from the perspective of environmental concerns that are often associated with the production of meat. In the article, Vegetarianism and Planetary health (2000), Michael Allen Fox states that strict vegetarianism ought to be adopted in order to avoid the eco-destructive nature of the livestock industry. Although there may be some truth to Fox’s initial premise which claims that eating meat is harmful for the environment, I will argue that strict vegetarianism is in fact unnecessary, as it does not exclusively solve the issue of ecological destruction. I will aim to expand on Fox’s claims in order to establish that it is better and more viable to adopt a ‘Demi-Vegetarian’ diet as described…

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Benefits Of Veganism

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Along with being beneficial towards animal welfare, veganism is beneficial towards the Earth’s health. By going vegan, the impact of climate change and pollution can be reduced, while saving water and other limited resources for our usage. Global warming is a major threat to the global environment yet, only carbon dioxide emissions are called the main culprits behind it when that is not the case. In a recent study, it was shown that methane from animal waste is 25- 100 times more responsible for global warming than transportation exhaust and carbon dioxide, which is responsible for only 13% of all greenhouse gas emissions. But by overlooking this fact, environmental organisations are missing a crucial step and individual can take to reduce global warming. By adopting a vegan…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to produce the mass quantities of food required to feed the United States—a nation of 321 million people—the focus is not on environmental care but on efficiency of food production. This is wrong. Machinery has overpowered the current state of agriculture, and in the case of the meat industry especially we have seen technology’s potential to harm rather than help. While already a vegetarian, reading Michael Pollan’s The Omnivore’s Dilemma allowed me to reexamine and thus reinforce my rationale for those choices: I have been a vegetarian since birth, so often times that choice is a passive one. There is a surplus of healthy options available for me without much active effort on my part, as a good portion of my family, immediate and extended, is vegetarian. In the modern age, the claim that humans need meat for optimal survival is unsubstantiated; in fact, a conscious vegetarian diet has been shown to have health benefits as well as environmental benefits.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    She further explains that if the rate of meat consumption continues to grow, by 2050, the global meat consumption will increase massively (Wellesley, n.p). These perspectives draw in a health concern for individuals because of the intake of red meat and processed meat. Meat significantly contributes to increasing the number of individuals suffering from chronic diseases such as cancers, heart illness, and type-2 diabetes. Also, she highlights environmental concerns such as land and water drainage. Wellesley continues to provide statistical evidence showing the importance of reducing meat consumption. According to Wellesley, livestock accounts for about 14.5% of greenhouse gas emissions; this is vital for maintaining the rise of global temperature below 2 degrees (Wellesley,…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With outside research expanding on Foer’s article it revealed that vegetarianism has benefits to not only ourselves but our environment as well. After finding research that helped expand on Foer’s ideal, or even complicating it, there is still the blatant point that the vegetarian lifestyle is a very credible one even though it may seem as if there are less health benefits or it’s hurting the environment. Neither of these claims are true proving that the choice to be vegetarian is one’s own and that it does hold massive health benefits and in the end is ultimately helping the…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The matter of eating meat is a heavily debated topic, especially with the threats of climate change, population change, and animal cruelty gaining popularity. The production of meat has been linked to the rise in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, such as methane. This claim has been intensified by the growing population and the food that is needed to support them. While these arguments against eating meats are somewhat compelling, there is plenty of evidence of to support eating meat. There are facts surrounding vegetarianism that make it logical and reasonable, but this can often be taken either too literally, or too far. Eating meat is perfectly ethical if the person eating it is informed of where and how their…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Which do you think is worse for the environment, driving a gas guzzling truck or eating beef every day? You might think that the truck is going to be worse, but you cannot see greenhouse gases and judge which is going to produce more gas. Studies are finding that cows, and other livestock, produce greenhouse gases, are having measurable effects to climate change. Although cars produce a lot of carbon dioxide (CO2) , livestock emit methane (CH4) and CO2, plus contribute to climate change in other ways.…

    • 1679 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If animal agriculture had this much of an impact over one hundred and seventy years ago, imagine the magnitude of impact it is having today. To provide land for the livestock, feed crops, slaughterhouses, and grazing fields, animal agriculture uses nearly seventeen million square miles of land. That’s about thirty percent of the earth’s land mass. Twenty-six percent of all ice-free land, seventy percent of all farming land, and thirty percent of all plant land surface is dedicated to animal agriculture. Vegetarian diets only require a portion of the thirty-three percent of farming land that animal agriculture uses, since one acre of plants can feed more humans than it can animals. Deforestation is a big result of animal agriculture since animals constantly need more food and areas to roam. Twenty-five million acres of rainforest in the Amazon was destroyed between 1996 and 2006, with nearly all of it going towards animal agriculture. Every minute over two-hundred sixty million acres of land are cleared for the purposes of animal agriculture. The land used then is degraded by overgrazing of livestock, compaction, and erosion from animal agriculture. The impact of animal agriculture on the environment is listed as one of the biggest sources of degradation which then decreases the amount of potential farming land. Worldwide twenty percent of pastures and seventy-three percent of dry pastures are degraded. Animal agriculture also uses large quantities of precious natural resources in addition to its massive land use. In the United States of America, it is estimated that one-third of all fossil fuels and raw materials are used for machinery and electricity in animal agriculture. There is a huge disparity between the cost of producing one pound of meat product versus…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It takes so many crops and resources to raise animals for meat production. “In fact, it takes up to 13 pounds of grain to produce just 1 pound of animal flesh. To produce one pound of animal protein vs. one pound of soy protein, it takes about 12 times as much land, 13 times as much fossil fuel, and 15 times as much water.” (Walsh 61). It’s no question that it is more efficient to produce plants than it is to produce meat. “Leading scientists have warned us that food shortages will become escalade over the next 40 years unless the world 's population switches almost completely to a vegetarian diet” (Walsh 57). Not only is it not cost efficient, but the consuming meat has been linked to multiple diseases and obvious health risks. A plant based diet would improve the obesity crisis America currently suffers through. The number of positive outcomes a meat free diet can introduce to upbringing generations is endless. For one it simply supports a healthy digestive system, furthermore, it also raises the probability of achieving and maintaining an active…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Piper asserts that a vegan diet leads to the death of many animals than that of a non-vegan. He claimed that tractors kill animals such as mice, moles, rabbits and other rodents or have their habitats destroyed (par. 3). According to Piper vegans should consider the reducing their plant 's consumption and “eat more cow” that graze on pasture (par, 4). Animals that produce meat produce more calories and proteins per head than plants making them environmentally friendly contrary to what vegans claimed that they are harmful to the environment. Animals require pasture that is part of biodiversity and by growing pasture; human beings are taking care of the…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The chances of earth’s environment declining will only increase if humanity continues its meat eating habits, due to the global effects that raising livestock cause to the climate. It has recently been made known to the public on a larger scale, that one of the greatest factors to the ozone layer being damaged is from raising livestock. It is up to us to fix this issue before it makes the world an unlivable place. We have to do this now instead of later. Recently, a group of environmentalists wanted to help save the planet, so they did as much research as they could to find the real issues. They found out that limiting the number of showers people take and driving your car less were not near as effective at saving the planet compared to eating less meat. There are many other environmentalists who share similar view points in this subject matter. Anyone who is interested in saving the planet should be aware of the benefits to the planet from going vegan. They showed how much water is required to raise livestock, it takes 264 gallons of water for just one pound of beef. It only…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Being vegetarian is a big argument in our society. Being vegetarian is to stop eating or cook almost anything that comes from animals. So you are not allowed to eat any kind of meat, fish or milk, but you are still allowed to eat eggs and honey. Don’t confuse being vegetarians with being vegan. Vegan is a higher degree of vegetarianism. When people are vegan they stop buying or eating anything that is from an animal so they won 't buy eggs, honey, leather boots, wool and so on. Being vegetarian also has huge respect for nature, so a lot of vegetarians are also trying to be eco-friendly and buy organic food to preserve the planet. Two of my family members, my mother, and my brother are actually vegetarian and they are doing really well. Vegetarianism is a big trend right now, given to Stahler Charles in the vegetarian 's journal published in 2012, “Four percent of the U.S adults were found to be vegetarians which approximately 9 millions of people.” Vegetarianism is…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people don’t realize what we eat has such an impact on our Earth and the people in it. Two of the issues with livestock is that it takes 2,500 gallons of water and twelve pounds of grain to produce only one pound of beef. 80-90% of US water is used for agriculture and over half of the U.S. grain is being fed to livestock instead of being used for direct human consumption, and animal agriculture is one of the leading causes of world hunger. Animal agriculture is also responsible for 91% of amazon destruction and has an extremely negative impact on climate change. The documentary Cowspiracy says “Animal Agriculture is responsible for 18% of greenhouse gas emissions. More than the combined exhaust from all transportation.” (Andersen, Kip and Kuhn, Keegan. Cowspiracy. CD-ROM. 2014.) Cowspiracy also touches on the fact that livestock is responsible for 65% of nitrous oxide emissions which has 296 times more impact on the environment than carbon dioxide. A recommended documentary for more information and facts about the negative impact of animal agriculture is Cowspiracy. Every single person can make a difference and lessen their carbon footprint. (Andersen 1)…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Vegetarians protest and fight the meat industry,” in most cases this is not true; however, it is commonly assumed. Many vegetarians are people who are trying to live a healthier lifestyle or people who just disagree with how meat is commonly processed. Although intentions are good skeptics and veggie lovers alike have their concerns with this dietary practice. The most notable concern is that of potential health risks . The benefits and risks of this way of life has raised many eyebrows over the years. The daunting question of how anyone could possibly survive without meat has caused controversies throughout history. It is not a foreign concept, but in most circumstances, it is treated like one. In today’s world, there is always seems to…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays