Llorent looked into many sources; however their main sources came straight from The Holy Bible and The Qur’an itself. Vicente Llorent-Bedmar and Vicente J. Llorent also used many other sources, their reference page ended up being almost half as long as their article; when having that many references there is not a single sentence in the article that cannot be backed up by at least two of the references. Vicente Llorent-Bedmar and Vicente J. Llorent used direct quotations from The Holy Bible and the Qur’an, so the reader gets to read Mohammad’s and Jesus’ words straight from the source so that there is no mistake for what is truly being said about women’s roles. In Religion and Social Hidden Curriculum- The Educative Influences of Christianity and Islam in Women, Vicente Llorent-Bedmar and Vicente J. Llorent write in a very simplistic way, they organize all of their points in logical ways. In the title, Religion and Social Hidden Curriculum- The Educative Influences of Christianity and Islam in Women, Vicente Llorent-Bedmar and Vicente J. Llorent have Christianity before Islam and in their article, they talk about Christianity’s view of women before Islam’s views so that the order is the flows with the …show more content…
Llorent gets to the Islam side of the article, things get a little more confusing. At one point Vicente Llorent-Bedmar and Vicente J. Llorent, talks about how the Qur’an says that women are equal to man and that she may spend money without consulting the man (Llorent-Bedmar 127), yet Vicente Llorent-Bedmar and Vicente J. Llorent turn around and say that the Qur’an says that a man is worth two women (Llorent-Bedmar 128). It may be because of my inexperience in the ways of Islam, but the article seemed to contradict