The Economic And Philosophic Manuscripts Of 1844 By Karl Marx

Good Essays
The “Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844” is qualitative data put together by Karl Marx to back up his theories for economic problems. According to the Preface of the book, the Manuscripts include topics such as wages of labor, profit of capital, and rent of land. Marx doesn 't let the worker blend in with the crowd and be oblivious to what 's going on around them. Marx thought anyone can be apart of the change depending on how far they 're willing to go. Karl Marx argues that there are only two groups of people in the world, the "property owners and the propertyless workers". Although there are still two different groups, the worker eventually works himself into becoming equal to the object he makes. His worth is only material and …show more content…
The property workers and propertyless workers spoken of in the Manuscripts of 1844 were then given different names in the Manifesto, bourgeois and proletarian. The first line opens up the basis of how the Manifesto will be presented. Marx and Engels used history to prove the social class struggles and the division between the powerful and powerless. According to them, every time there was an ongoing battle between classes it would go on until a war or a different perspective on society was taken into consideration. This is definitely true, examples being the civil and women 's rights movements. Black people and women both went through years of oppression. Eventually they realized they needed a united front to gain the rights they deserved. After many years of protesting, both have gained the privileges that they rightfully deserve. According to Marx, Free Trade was exploiting because it made even respectable careers sound like an average worker. The bourgeois have established themselves so comfortably in their positions by expanding their reach into every possible institution they could be apart of. Although the workers have established their own importance, according to Marx the imbalance started from feudal societies era where there was a set boss and a set worker. Even today, most of America has an average wage and no matter what level of the company you 're in, there is always a boss you …show more content…
Marx said they are in constant battle with one another even though they 're all in the same group. This is done unconsciously by the proletariat because of the propaganda that the bourgeoise has put in their mind to do their dirty work. “Every victory obtained so obtained is a victory for the bourgeoise”, Marx pg 480. Any accomplishment by the efforts of the proletarian is only enjoyed by the bourgeoise because of the system they set up to have control over everything. However without the middle class workers, the bourgeoise would have nothing to control. The proletarians don 't see the amount of power they could have united. According to Marx, the only way for the proletariat to overpower the bourgeoise is through war. The violent revolt against the bourgeoise will show that they no longer have power to control or protect the oppressed class, deeming them unfit to rule. Marx said that each nation has to deal with their own bourgeoise class and then as a whole, the class will disappear when their subordinates no longer obey or need them. If you remove the competition amongst the workers, their advancement will lead to not needing the bourgeoise. Without continuous product development and workers the bourgeoise will no long have authority. I believe this to be true because without a worker to control, a boss as no power. The hierarchy of life doesn 't allow the lower class to surpass their

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In a capitalist state few people are benefited. The way of administration is such that there will never be a place for the poor or middle class. A baseless fear is always harbored that if the government gives in to most of the demands of the working class the rich and the high class people will never have a proper place. The capitalist way of thinking is that an economy of a country should always be controlled by the well to do people and the rich. It is only then they feel that their future is in safe hands.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Finally, instead of the gap between the bourgeoisie and the proletariats expanding to the point of proletariat collapse the proletariats will find a humanity among themselves to form a new society. The life the labourers lead does not allow them to satisfy a sense of humanity that is imperative to existence, and they will reject dehumanization. Upon this rejection they will seek ways out of it, and this will finally result in the demolition of a capitalist…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Everything is to be approved and the people are not free to make their own choices. “Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other – Bourgeoisie and Proletariat.” (Marx 1; ch.1) Marx is referring to classifying the people and having them against each other. He wants there to be a middle class of people to set the ways for the lower class of people. This doesn’t give the lower class any value to be able to grow or become greater. If they are constantly controlled and told they are lower, then they will never try to be…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mill adds that individuality helps everyone learn because “diversity lets us see the potential of combining the positive traits of different people” (28). On the other hand, Marx credits the capitalist in society, overlooking the potential of the worker, for society’s growth. “Capital is the governing power over labor, and the capitalist holds all that power” (Marx, 11). He argues that nothing can withstand the power of the capitalist, implying that the opinion and thoughts of the capitalists are the only ones that matter. Placing all control in the hands of the capitalists proves Mill’s argument- valuing the opinion of the majority, whether numerically or by economic power, is a detriment to society.…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marx and Engel idea of communism is that “class inequality would end with collective control of property and growth in size of power of the working class” (Essay UK). In summary, under conflict perspective we can say that the basic form of interaction in society is not cooperation, but competition and this leads to conflict. Because individuals and groups compete for advantage and power, there is always going to be conflict in a society. However, when a large group in the lower social class is competing against the upper class for a change, the outcome would often be a major social…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Under capitalism individual doesn’t receive any benefits from whatever they produce, they lack the ability of to produce to gain money or feel satisfy after an accomplishment, followed by a quote Marx said, “When human beings become alienate from what they produce they lose control over their product”. Secondly he argues about alienation from productions. Individuals who works hard long hours yet gets paid low wages, it doesn’t matter how many workers were producing, because of that works were alienated cause to not seeing gains or higher wage from their hard work and productive producers. Another alienation was from the individuals lack of control. When you build something for yourself or your company you put more energy into because the more profit you make from is more money in your own pocket, not under capitalism.…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Since the factories would no longer be owned by the capitalist, but instead owned by the state, this would rid profit-making as its number one priority. Industrial production would now be used to meet the needs of the people, instead of just being another means for a select few, to accumulate more wealth. The need for a ruling class would no longer exists. Socialism would then transition into communism. Under this new communal regime, all of the important needs of a society would be finally met.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The struggle is that factory owners doest want to pay a fair salary because if they do that they wouldn’t have gain as much profit as the actually do. The bourgeoisie are only willing to help themselves to acquire more profit and leaving the working class in the same struggle without any way to get out of struggling lifestyle. That’s one reason I agree with Marx and Engels statement about the bourgeoisie and the working…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Laborers are at times dispensable and then other times greatly needed. In addition, he argues that there is a false sense freedom in capitalism. Workers believe they get to decide whether to work and control their own labor. However, this is false as all workers are forced to work in this system their only choice is who they will work for. Capitalism stifles worker’s true self and personal expression as their life becomes completely revolved around this system and earning a wage to survive,…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Even though a communist society is looking to take care of all its people, it cannot do that on its own if the people in the society do not continue to produce necessities and provides services. Since things like money have been abolished, now everyone can perform their job with the feeling of being as equally as valuable as everyone else. Thus, class antagonism soon ceases to exist, and with this leads to another central feature of communism which is the loss of state. This is because the abolition of private…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays