The Pros And Cons Of The Two Atomic Bombs

Improved Essays
The dropping of the two atomic bombs has become a very controversial topic. People have many different views on what should have been done. One is that the United States should of only dropped one bomb on Japan or that they should never have dropped any bombs and gone a different route. When looking at the facts and what the United States would have planned to do if they did not drop the bomb, dropping the bomb was the best solution to beating Japan in the war.
Research of atomic bombs started before World War 2 began. In 1939 American scientist decided to organize a project to make the newly discovered fission process for military use. The organization started small, they worked at the Columbia University in Manhattan and was only given a
…show more content…
If the United States had not dropped the bomb then they had a plan called Operation Downfall. It was mid 1945 when they had planned it and they split it into two parts. One part was operation Olympic and the other Operation Coronet. What they planned to do was a shore raid with a lot of troops and continuous air raids from their bases in China and Korea. If they were to do this attack then they would have expected to lose around 1,000,000 U.S. soldiers in the process along with using a lot of resources to keep the attack going. The Japanese would have defended their land with everything that they had. Doing this attack would have prevented the loss of many Japanese civilians because the bombs would never have been dropped but then it would exhausted the U.S. of a lot of soldiers and resources while doing so. Also if the bomb was never dropped then the United States would have not have shown that they were a world power and their new technology. Also some people say that the U.S. should have only dropped the one bomb and let the Japanese of had more time to decide their surrender. While this has had some reason behind it doing the U.S. wanted to show their power and the technology that they

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Document K Secretary of War Henry Stinson says clearly, “The decision to use the atomic bomb was a decision that brought death to over a hundred thousand Japanese… But this deliberate, premeditated destruction was our least abhorrent alternative”. America had been bombing civilian and industrial cities for almost a year which alone caused many more deaths than the bombs. Also, the operation to invade the Japanese mainland would have ended in a bloodbath of millions of civilian deaths including those in Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the Americans had already planned to bomb those industrial cities months before. It was fair for the Japanese to fear occupation but anyone could tell that the germans and the americans were some of the nicest…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If they wouldn't never dropped the bomb they would have stayed where they was. The United States wanted to keep them safe while World War…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Analysis

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The two atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima (Aug. 6) and Nagasaki (Aug. 9) totaled to almost 200,000 Japanese casualties (Document A). President Harry Truman decided to use this horrific weapon considered to be immoral despite other options to force Japan to surrender, ending the second world war. On June 6th, 1945, the Japanese War Council stated, “we shall -- thanks to the advantages of our terrain and the unity of our nation, prosecute the war until the bitter end” (Document C). Japan had no intentions to surrender until absolutely necessary. This statement is supported through when Japan surrendered.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the Dropping the atomic bomb was the only correct decision for the United States because of casualties being less than what they would have if America had invaded, the brutality of Japanese towards the American POW, and the importance of intimidating Stalin. By dropping the Atomic bomb, the United States rightfully saved thousands of potential lives. After the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the amount of Japanese lives lost totaled to 105,000. (Doc E)…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dropping of atomic bombs is Hiroshima and Nagasaki was one of the most catastrophic bombing is history. It resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths and the destruction of more than half of the cities infrastructures. Nonetheless Harry S. Truman and his advisors saw it as the only way to lead Japan to an unconditional surrender. While this is simply the opinion of the United States Commander in Chief and his advisors, there is a lot of controversy as to if it was truly a necessity in forcing Japan to surrender and ending the war. In the “Yes” article, “The Biggest Decision: Why We Had To Drop The Atomic Bomb” by Robert James Maddox argues why dropping atomic bombs in Japan became a necessity when land invasions and the Russians’ mediation were not effective.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    " On the other hand, the United States’ decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was a military measure to ensure that Japan would fully surrender. In Document H titled, Radio Address, Harry S Truman, President Truman stated, “We have used it in order to shorten the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans.” He stated that the U.S had used the atomic bombs to end the war quickly and to save more American lives. However, as said by General HH Arnold, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.” This meant that even if the bombs weren’t used, then Japan still would have…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The decision to use the atomic bomb posed several significant moral dilemmas for President Harry S. Truman, among these were justifications, alternatives, and complications of the situation. After Teddy Roosevelt 's death, Truman was the new president with a huge decision to make only a few months after. People felt Truman was an insecure man and poorly informed by Roosevelt until his entry to the presidency. It was months later that he learned of America’s dark secret, the Manhattan Project. There were presumably three possible alternatives available to Americans to avoid using the atomic bomb such as invasion, increasing bomb threats and blockades of Japan, and negotiating peace.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The bomb itself showed the potential of America's scientific and technological advancement due to the incredible amount of damage and lives it took in one explosion. Despite this, the bomb could actually save lives because of how fast it took them. A single blast can take over 80,000 lives and annihilate about 10 square miles of land. With this power, it would stop Japan from sending in more soldiers again us and pretty much kill themselves about it, and less American soldiers would be wounded or killed by fighting. America could quickly wipe out Japan without so much as to send a single soldier, compared to how slow and grueling constant air raids would be despite the fact they took more lives.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, I investigated the sources that were against the use of the bomb before the bomb was dropped including the intentions behind the bomb, and concerns from the Interim Committee . Then I looked at the evidence against the bomb after the bomb was dropped, including Henry Stimson’s concerns, and the horrific loss of Japanese life due to the bomb. It is interesting to see the difference between the worries before the bomb and after the bomb. The first document I looked at was Dropping the Atomic Bomb was Neither Necessary Nor Justifiable by Gar Alperovitz. In his essay he argues one of the reasonings for the use of the bomb was to scare the Soviets and to prevent an invasion of the Red Army in Manchuria.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    You have heard two reasons why dropping the atomic bombs in Japan was not justified and unnecessary. But perhaps the most compelling reasons why dropping the bomb was not justified is that the United States was weeks or months away from Japan surrendering and the war ending before dropping the bombs and killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people. As you will hear from General Mitsuru Ushijima, Japan was already losing the war. The country was surrounded by US troops, Americans controlled Japanese airspace and waterways, and US casualties in military battles were low compared to Japanese. The US commanders knew that Japan was close to surrendering as Germany had already surrendered, and Russia, another powerful military force, was…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bombing in Japan In August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, causing major destruction and life threatening issues, over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Everyone has their own take on what really happened and have their own perspective on controversies regarding the United States’ decision to drop the bombs. Perspectives that I will be discussing today are from three disciplines: scientific view (Leo Szilard), journalism view (Wilfred Bruchett), and historical view (a writer of an article called “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” and Bernard Feld’s article “Lessons from Hiroshima and Nagasaki”). Each have their own unique approach on the atomic bomb and it’s affects.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They must’ve been planning something and had a brilliant plan to take out America. Dropping the first bomb on Japan was a very big destruction, 80,000 people died instantly from the bomb. If we wouldn’t have sent this bomb, Japan wouldn’t have taken us as serious as they shouldn’t have. America was sending this bomb as a very destructive, brutal warning. Telling them to surrender or die.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The bombing in Japan showcased the true power of the atomic bomb. In a sense, the world became more cautious in using atomic warfare due to the horrors of its effects. If the US did not use the atomic bombs, other nations would not have as much of a sense of its power. “Since it would certainly be used in the future time,” the bombs could have been used against the US (Source 5). Therefore, using the bombs on Japan may have prevented the US from being bomb with atomic warfare.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my opinion, United States were right on dropping the bombs. Although hundreds of innocent Japanese lives were lost, millions of American and Japanese lives could have been killed. An article on www.militarythistorynow.com before the decision to drop the bombs, there was Operation Downfall. Operation Downfall was the mission where US soldier would storm onto Japanese homeland but never happened. The article states, “Had the invasion not been preempted by the dropping of the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, almost all agree that the campaign would have stood as the bloodiest chapter of the Second World War, adding as much as an additional 10 million dead”.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dahi makes is that the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki did not save half a million American lives as former president Harry Truman claimed. While it is true that the bombings had devastating effects both initially and thereafter, the U.S. would have surely invaded the Japanese islands later in 1945-1946 (Stimson 385). Considering famous battles like those at Iwo Jima and Okinawa, it is easy to guess that the same death and destruction for US and Japanese soldiers would occur for several months, or even years; in fact, it was projected that major fighting would not cease until late in 1946 (Stimson 385). The looming warfare could have resulted in over one million casualties of just American troops (Stimson, 385). These projected numbers were, and still are, alarming to imagine.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays