Dred Scott Case Study

Superior Essays
The institution of slavery has been around since the pilgrims came to America. The southern economy of the United States has always been centered around large-scale farming with slavery on plantations growing cotton and tobacco. The northern and southern regions of the United States have very different economies. The north revolved around manufacturing and industry, while having some agriculture on a small-scale. The South had been bullied by the North for too long; last straw came in November 1860 when Abraham Lincoln won the Presidential Election. The South knew that the heart of their economy (slavery) was in danger of emancipation. Within three months, seven states, out of an eventual eleven, from the South seceded from the United States …show more content…
Southern plantation owners were afraid of their livelihoods being destroyed because without slaves they would not be able to keep their plantations going. Without the slaves doing essentially free labor the plantation owners would have to change their entire way of life. The times of sitting on the porch drinking ice tea would be over. The plantation owner would have to go to work on their plantations because even though they seemed wealthy, that was only because the labor was free; granted the slaves were housed and fed to a minimum. Paying the slaves to work would decrease their income by quite the large amount. Contrary to popular belief, some of the south agreed with Lincoln’s plan for limited slavery, however the south was against complete emancipation which was Lincoln 's plan all along. Which makes sense because emancipation meant an end to many plantations. The combination of the south not feeling represented in the election and Lincoln going for complete emancipation is ultimately what led to the South seceding. As the saying goes, “Fool me once shame on me, fool me twice shame on you.” The south was definitely fooled in the election because, as stated previously, there was no way for Lincoln to lose the 1860 election. They were fooled again when Lincoln went for complete emancipation, after previously stating that he was for limited slavery; which in turn would lead to the Civil War. There were many factors that led into the Civil War, if they had not all happen in such close proximity the result might have been different. The combination of the 1860 election, the Dred Scott case, and the nation being divided by Abraham Lincoln all led to the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Slavery was the underlying cause of the American Civil War. After the Republican and abolitionist Abraham Lincoln won the election in 1861, southern states became afraid of his political believes. His election caused major discussion in the southern states, that depended on slavery. States were preparing for secession because of the new president’s future actions. These states were very dependent on agriculture and abolishing slavery would certainly hurt them.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Republican Party Formation

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Lincoln’s election outraged many southerners” (Smith). They reject the idea of sucumming to a president that was in accordance with republican ideology. Their ideology happening to be the abolishment of slavery. They lost the power to accumulate the number of slave states because the North preferred an equal amount of slave states to Free states. The south also thought that this was going to influence Lincoln’s decisions over the issue, which many were right to believe for his “growing opposition led him to introduce a law that gradually ended slavery” (Smith).…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a matter of fact, both groups tried to avoid the war but it was inevitable. For example, the 1820’s Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850 were put in place to solve the issue of slave expansion in western territories. Unfortunately, neither of these compromise were able to prevent the war. The southern states were determined to leave the union. However, they were not able to leave peacefully because states have no right to secede under the…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Civil War Slavery Causes

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Final Exam Question 1: Slavery The Cause of the Civil War Prior to 1830 Slavery was viewed as a necessary evil among many Americans. As a result of the Constitutional Convention the founders banned the importation of new slaves, put a temporary hold on debates to abolish slavery, and instituted the three-fifths rule for federal representation and taxation. The founding fathers, hoped through providence this regrettable evil would eventually become extinct in time (Stamp pg, 157). Following the American Revolution slavery had been on this path and was on the decline in many states. However, the invention of the cotton gin greatly increased the profitability of cotton.…

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example the United States Supreme Court in the 1857 Dred Scott Decision ruled that slaves were subhuman property with no rights of citizenship this was a law against the slaves. Also They did not want slavery to end because it was going to hurt the economy and political because slaves brought a lot of income to the south and also to the north by working for the white people. Also the Confederacy did not want to end slavery because the important thing they had with slave was slave labor. For example slave labor where slave that worked on the fields, house, or business of a white…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The northerners were ecstatic that a candidate running for president did not support the expansion of slavery, while the south feared of Lincoln winning the presidency. In fact, Lincoln did not win the popular vote but he won the electoral vote. Yet, Lincoln still won the election without a single vote from the south. The south believed that Lincoln was trying to abolish slavery completely and thought they would lose all political power. If the south would have accepted the win of Lincoln, the civil war could have been prevented.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reconstruction was suppose to help the citizens. However, it failed and left racial justice problems that people faced in the future. After the civil war, the North gave free slaves right to vote, which they were unfit to handle. Before his death, Lincoln was willing to forgive the southern states and bring them back in the Union. Lincoln even refused to sign the Wade- Davis Bill, which mandated strict requirement for the south before they could make their new government.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Abraham Lincoln won the 1860 presidential election, running opposing slavery, Southern states began seceding from the Union, which touched off the Civil War. Many people from the South today claim that the Confederacy and the division cause were not all about slavery and racism. In the Civil War, however, leaders were much more honest about their thoughts. They believed that blacks were inferior to whites. They also believed that slavery was a good thing.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    More than likely, when someone contemplates the foundations of the American Civil War they automatically think slavery. Slavery in America began in the early 17th Century. The majority of slaves came from Africa against their will and forced to work on plantations under horrifying conditions. This went on for a very extensive time, and as the demand for cotton and tobacco grew, slavery in the South became the foundation of their economy. The…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments gave slaves hope for the right of freedom, citizenship and the right to vote but Jim Crow Laws in the south soon prevented these rights. Southern stakeholders were initially threatened by the emancipation of the slaves as they were a major asset that if taken would destroy their way of life. However; once Johnson was elected President over time he became lenient toward the south allowing them back in to parliament and their hopes soon grew. As the hopes of the ex-slaves for equality faded, the southern stakeholders’ dissatisfaction with emancipation diminished as the new position of ex-slaves developed into a system much like slavery. Emancipation raised the hope of slaves, Radical Republicans and Northerners in the beginning and while limited freedom and education was delivered and some were reunited with family members, their hopes for justice and equality were generally short lived and not satisfied.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays