The Dramatic Crime Fallacy
So many delusions and misconceptions have moved stealthily in the minds of society that have crept into the minds of people to our belief, assessment, and thoughts about regular happenings of crime. They must be systematically eradicated from our minds, as we should work calmly to absolve them. Too many statistics are thrown at us regularly that do not cover the real picture of the crime neither paint the true crime story. The media keeps beeping at us, trying to come back with astonishing crime stories, with clever dramatic instances, and striking cases that miss the point. The court and police are surely playing a prominent and important role in our society, but without representation. The defense mechanism …show more content…
It has the capability and value, regarded widely as the best method to guide and educate criminals and offender’s mental treatment and educational assessment. This RNR strategy underlies certain methods which are exclusively applied and extensively used in the case of risks, that needs instruments to assess offenders, which is the only available theoretical model used to understand, construe and interpret and treat the offender literature. Lately, the GLM that is good lives model was promoted to offer alternative method to enhance to RNR. While GLM offers its positions away from RNR due to its strength, it is based on positive and restorative rehabilitation model. Another way is that of GLM hypothesization that is used in personal enhancing, where execution will naturally lead to reduction in criminogenic requirements, while RNR applies and progresses in the reverse direction. In response to GLM criticisms in case of RNR, it concludes that less material is included by GLM which does not exist in RNR, even though the proponent of RNR learns from the famous appeal to state that GLM, having its constructive, strength basis focus, can garner from clinician seen in the past decades. (Wormith, …show more content…
The program results demonstrated the entire prevention program which varied in its value and effectiveness. Certain programs were hopeful, and others were not scrutinized properly. Further, considerable reductions were observed in the crime rates and the many crimes of a serious nature. It could be achieved mainly by preventing crimes in certain areas where extreme poverty prevailed, that was where everything of scarcity was concentrated. In such places, maximum homicides occurred, and the rate of homicide was 22 times the entire nation’s crime rate. The investigators also accomplished that the entire result of crime prevention starting from formal to informal exercises and courses were observed in several institutional surroundings, schools, labor markets, communities, families, explicit premises, police, as well as criminal justice. The crime prevention effectiveness was observed in high violence occurring neighborhood that required instantaneous intervention in several local institutions. But, the existing statutory plan did not permit the DOJ to offer effectual direction to entire country concerning what precisely works to effectively prevent crimes. Nonetheless, regardless of current several limitations, DOJ strived to offer far improved and superior guidance to the local offices, local and State Governments to create an understanding of the success of every local crime and violence