The Dragons Of Inaction Article Analysis

808 Words 4 Pages
Summary

Contemporary, people live in enormous social network, but they never perceive climate change that is a serious problem. While people do not understand how to solve as the problem occur, they can see the problem that exists in the life. Robert Gifford in his article “The Dragons of Inaction” published by the American Psychological Association (2011) and Cynthia M.Frantz and F.Stephan Mayer in “The Emergency of Climate Change: Why Are We Failing to Take Action” published by the Society for the Psychological Study of Study of Social Issues (2009). Both article discussed psychological barriers that prevent taking action to mitigate climate change, and the both also mentioned the main reason lead climate to lose action is human behaviors that increasing flow greenhouse gases and other environmental damage. The authors of both articles mentioned that people thought of climate change, but they didn’t notice action. Frantz and Mayer (2009) emphasized that optimism is one factor that can lead people to fail to perceive an event like environmental change. Numerous people did
…show more content…
In Frantz and Mayer’s article, individuals who avoid quite the responsibility of behaviors are not going to act. They also stated that people’s behaviors are influenced by others’ reaction and rely on others for information. In addition, norms not only improve the information. It can guide behaviors on the part of policy makers or activities. On the other hand, Gifford stated that compared with others’ situation is deeply in gardening tendency. People not only compare with each other but also think about the equity and equality because they do not want to be a victim services for some individuals who do nothing. Also, Gifford mentioned social norms often plan to use energy, and it can develop through social networks to mitigate

Related Documents