The Double Jeopardy Clause Of The Fifth Amendment

Decent Essays
Dipesh Vaghasia
2.1
I believe the “double jeopardy” clause of the Fifth Amendment would not protect Libby if she were to kill her husband. According to the Fifth Amendment, “nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb” (Fifth Amendment). This means that if someone has been tired for a certain crime, they cannot be tried again for the same exact crime. So in the case of Libby in “Double Jeopardy”, she has already been convicted for her husbands murder and served her time however if she were to kill him at the end of the movie she can be convicted of killing him. This is because the “double jeopardy” clause only ensures that someone cannot be tried again in court, meaning if a prosecutor wanted

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Death Of Robert Newsom

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Before we can even talk about why there were charges against Celia and what were the circumstances; first, we need to talk about the events that led to the murdering of Robert Newsom. It all started in 1850, when Celia a name of a young slave girl who was bought a man named Robert Newsom who was from Missouri. He was an owner of a plantation in Callaway County and purchased Celia at the age of 14. We still clearly do not know about her life before she was bought by the Newsom family. Robert Newsom who was a recent widow raped Celia when he was taking her back to the farm.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fifth amendment is part of the bill of rights in which each amendment specifies not only our rights but our protections against the government when needed. It is stated within the amendment that “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury…”. Similarly, it is also divided into three separate clauses that enhance the major phases when dealing in a criminal investigation and prosecutions. The first one is the grand jury, secondly right to self-incrimination, and finally double jeopardy. The way it came to be in this order was due to not only history, but by also the clarification Alfredo Garcia initiated.…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Children are a blessing to everyone. The joy of carrying the baby and experiencing the pains of labor is an experience that a mother never forgets. Not every woman can have children. Some have to adopt. All women will not have the experience to have a child whether that decision is by force (abortions at a young age, cancer in ovaries etc.,) or choice (A woman does not want to bear children).…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fifth Amendment has been around for almost 230 years, and states that people can not be tried more than once for the same crime. Having a second trial can have many downsides such as, expenses, reduced quality, people biased because of a retrial, and personal heartbreak. Double jeopardy should be changed to Triple Jeopardy because finding new evidence, having new opinions, and bringing people long awaited justice can make the difference of a lifetime. Finding new evidence against a defendant is a great reason to have a second trial.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Double jeopardy law originated in The ancient civilizations relied on the blood dispute to provide justice when one person killed another, the relatives of a dead person had a duty to avenge death. While the blood feud manifested harsh "retributive" justice, it could, in theory, lead to an endless series of murders as each death was avenged. The Greek dramatist Aeschylus dramatized a cycle of revenge of the blood faith in the Oresteian trilogy, which ended with Greek gods deciding that an essay is a better way to achieve justice. Part of the reason for replacing the blood contest with a trial is to allow the cycle of vengeance to end, provide a final result to a dispute, and create litigation rest. But to protect the purpose of the results, there must exist a principle that prohibits a new judgment of the same case or the same question.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The exclusionary rule, means the rule that illegally gathered evidence may not be used in a criminal trial. Its evidence that is obtained by a unconstitutional search or seizure is inadmissible at trial. The exclusionary rule enables courts to exclude incriminating evidence from introduction at trial upon proof that the evidence was procured in contravention of a constitutional provision. (Hall, 2015). The rule allows defendants to challenge the admissibility of evidence by bringing a pre-trial motion to suppress the evidence.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Double Jeopardy

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Right against self-incrimination (“taking the Fifth”) – It’s when they cannot be punished for not talking to police. 14. Double jeopardy – Double jeopardy is a defense that prevents a defendant for being tried for the same crime twice or more.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Amendment IV The fourth amendment is one of the primitive and mainly significant entitlements bestowed to the citizens of The United State of America; the law, distinctively states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” What Does the Fourth Amendment Mean? The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution stipulates, the entitlement of individuals to be secure in their individualities, dwellings, documents, and possessions, against irrational searches…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Fifth Amendment

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Would this be a violation of the Fifth Amendment’s double jeopardy clause? The Supreme Court took a vote that lead to a 5-4 win for Smith, but this method was not available at the time of Smith’s trial. Some courts have misinterpreted the amendment like in the Smith vs. Massachutes…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The day begins just like any other in a quiet, small town, when out of nowhere a suspicious man enters the local bank and confidently states that this is a holdup. All of the innocent bystanders inside the bank are physically incapacitated initially out of fear as the bank robber brandishes his intimidating firearm while giving directions to the civilians not to move or speak unless exclusively instructed to do so at his command. The man also warns them not to try anything sneaky or else he will be compelled to do something crazy. The suspect makes his way to the bank tellers at which point he aggressively grabs one of the employees by the shirt and demands they empty the vaults and hand over the funds to him. Meanwhile, one of the hostages…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To expound on the process of the Fourth Amendment, we must recognize and interpret its meaning. The Fourth Amendment is the protection of our citizen privacy against certain governmental interferences (Bohm & Haley, 2014, p. 105). The procedural rights of The Fourth Amendment are the search and seizure of citizens property and/or person in violation of the criminal law, with a meaningful interference by the government. There has to be probable cause. A search and seizure have to be within reason, with a descriptive warrant explaining exactly what is to be searched and seized, signed by a judge.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Now, ladies and gentlemen, allow me to point out some keywords that we the government, find to of the government, in order to support our stand. Firstly, double jeopardy is a general principle of English law that a person may not be tried twice for the same offence following a legitimate acquittal. This is a procedural defence that protect anyone who has been cleared of committing a crime from standing…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V. Andrews Case Study

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Defences in the Case of R v. Andrews Defences are a denial or justification for criminal behaviour, these are presented by the defence attorneys, in court, to reduce a charge or diminish a charge. In the case of R v. Andrews the accused pleaded guilty and the defence that was used was an alibi. The Defence of an Alibi An alibi is a defence that is raised by the defence counsel and the accused, that demonstrates that the accused was not present at the crime scene at time that the illegal offence occurred. If an alibi is raised, as a defence then the burden of proof is on the crown and not the accused, to demonstrate that the accused was indeed present at the crime scene, when the crime took place.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Law Of Attempt Essay

    • 1602 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Attempt is an inchoate offence meaning it became an offence in order to stop criminal acts before they properly occurred. The law of attempt is one of the most contentiously debated topics in criminal law; mainly because the legislation is intolerably unclear and it is often left to the discretion of judges to interpret. The fact that a criminal offence has not yet occurred means that in some situations it is hard to determine whether there was intent to commit the offence and whether the accused’s actions were not ‘merely preparatory’ to the commission of the offence. Other issues have arisen around whether it is proper to punish people who have not yet committed an offence even if they are on their way towards the commission of the offence.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Actus Reus Research Paper

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Actus Reus and Mens Reus Actus Reus is defined as an element of criminal responsibility, the wrongful act or omission that comprises the physical components of a crime (Actus Reus n.d.). Mens rea is defined as an element of criminal responsibility, a guilty mind; a guilty or wrongful purpose; a criminal intent. Guilty knowledge and willfulness (Mens rea n.d.). In criminal law they are referred to as the two elements of a crime and you need both the guilty mind and physical criminal act to prosecute the accused.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays