Khan, Kapoor, and Cooraswamy, (2000) asserts that aggression against females happens in every nation, and touches every margins of values, socioeconomic class, schooling, earnings, race, and age. Numerous cultures and nations prohibit aggression against females; nevertheless, realism is that coercion against female’s human rights are frequently authorized under the disguise of cultural performances and customs, and misconception of spiritual doctrines (Khan et al, 2000). If the victimization occurs within the household, then the exploitation is successfully overlooked by the unspoken quietness and the unresponsiveness exhibited by the government and the law enforcement (Khan et al, 2000).
Law enforcement, prosecuting attorney, judges, and physicians follow the same old-fashioned ethics that backups the family as an institution and the domination of the masculine individual (Khan et al, 2000). Consequently, it is vital to educate police officers, health officials and lawyers who interact with battered women and children to understand gender victimization, to comprehend the suffering of the victims and to yield the correct proof for …show more content…
Interviews and testimonials will also be used as a pretest and posttest.
References
Barrett, M. (2001). A stakeholder approach to responsiveness and accountability in non-profit organizations. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 36-51.
Khan, M., Kapoor, S., & Cooraswamy, R. (2000). Domestic violence against women and girls. Innocenti digest, 6, 1-30.
Slep, A. M. S., & O 'leary, S. G. (2005). Parent and partner violence in families with young children: rates, patterns, and connections. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 73(3),