The Doctrine Of Double Effect

2405 Words 10 Pages
Technological advances have prolonged human life and changed not only what it means to practice medicine, but what it means to be alive. In some cases, patients turn to their physicians to assist them in dying. The purpose of this essay is not to promote physician aid in dying or even provide a stance on the subject. Rather, the purpose is to question the moral distinction between physician aid in dying and the doctrine of double effect. Through defining these two terms and analyzing medical cases where killing a patient is morally permissible, I argue that there is no moral distinction between physician aid in dying and the doctrine of double effect.
Originating from “Thomas Aquinas’…discussion of the permissibility of self-defense in the Summa
…show more content…
However, for the sake of the argument, let’s assume that the intent of the clinician is to relieve the patient’s pain in cases invoking the doctrine of double effect. How does the intent and details of the case using the doctrine of double effect differ from the intent and details of the case using physician aid in dying? Take a look at the chart below.

Theory Invoked doctrine of double effect physician aid in dying

Patient A Patient B
Agent Providing clinician clinician
Medication

Agent Administering clinician patient

Intent of Clinician relieve pt.’s pain relieve pt.’s pain

Means to Relieve titrated pain killer lethal dose of medication all at once
Pt.’s Pain

End Effect patient A dies patient B

Related Documents