The Divine Command Theory Analysis

Improved Essays
It is common for people to link morality and religion together. It is believed by many that morality is understood based on religion. “The Divine Command Theory”, states that behavior is considered morally right if commanded by God and morally wrong if it is forbidden by God. The theory also provides a strong reason on why people believe morality is something that they should worry about. However in the passage “The Divine Command Theory”, James Rachels’ stands his ground when he claims that God is unnecessary for ethics and morality.
If we were to refer back to Platos passage “Does Morality Depend on Religion”, Rachels viewpoint could be proven. According to Plato a "choice is right because God commanded it" takes the conception of morality

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In essence, God decides morality, the basis of right and wrong. If God says something is right then it is morally right; if God says something is wrong then it also is morally wrong. However, flaws in this theory have caused many people to deny it and believe in Saint Thomas Aquinas Theory of Natural Law. This theory is divided into three parts: the world has values and views built into its nature, describe not only how things are but also how they ought to be, and how do we determine what is tight and wrong. The two theories are opposite in terms of viewpoint but in today's world, but of them are rejected because of conflicting issues.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthyphro Pious Analysis

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pious and Impious Within the Book of Euthyphro discusses of the subjects that justify or do not justify everyday morality and tribulations. Ultimately, the holiness of that which judges people and their actions including Euthyphro’s. There are, however, possible contradictions that Euthyphro has within the perception or definition of morality, holiness, or crime. Perceptions whether it is of people or gods often times do not incorporate other insights into their belief system or actions.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lest we forget, we are not the supreme masters of our fate. Only God is sovereign. He has created a moral universe in which the law of cause-and-effect is a certainty. Morality includes a person’s standard of conduct or daily practice.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 9 of James Rachels and Stuart Rachels The Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors elaborate on the philosophical question, whether there are absolute moral rules. In order to illustrate the philosophical moral question, Rachels uses President Harry Truman’s dilemma on the use of atomic bombs to end World War II and in the process comes in contact with Elizabeth Anscombe, a 20th century foremost philosophical champion of the doctrine that moral rules are absolute, the theory of categorical imperative, Kant’s arguments on lying to make the case on moral judgments. First, the Rachels’ use President Harry Truman’s encounter with Elizabeth Anscombe, a 20th century foremost philosophical champion of the doctrine that…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    One particular debate that has bedeviled humanity since its inception is the question of the nature of human morality. We as humans argue about the source of morality: most religious fundamentalists argue that morality comes from a deity, whereas secularists tend to argue that morality comes from within and is subjective. We also argue about its objectivity, and many will attest that their moral code is a paragon above all others. Morality is a code by which most sane humans live their lives; it would seem logical that such a dominant force in human interaction would foster such discourse. Amongst all the uncertainty in the nature of morality, however, there is but one certainty: morality is based entirely on perspective.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Murder And Lying Analysis

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Before Rachels stated his stand regarding the cultural judgment of the “excision” he stated that we, all of the cultures should have at least some of our values or moral codes that each culture has in common. Rachels gives the example of Murder and lying to make his point that we all have some moral codes or virtues that are universal by stating “…there are some moral rules that all societies must have in common, because those rules are necessary for society to exist. The rules against lying and murder are two examples. And in fact, we do find these rules in force in all viable cultures. Cultures may differ in what they regard as legitimate exceptions to the rules, but this disagreement exists against a background of agreement on the larger…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Faith And Diplomacy

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The beauty of “moral compass”, explored by Tenzin Gyatso, is that it does not depend on religious faith. The core values that operate as a foundation of moral compass are taught by our significant others since the first days of our life. They include such rules as: do not lie, do not harm, help others in need and etc. and serve as a foundation of ethical reasoning. Even though religious faith has the power to unite, it also has the power to divide.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Protagoras, a Greek thinker and teacher, while commenting about his affliction to human reasoning and logic, quipped, “Man is the measure of all things.” (Jowett, 1871, p. 17) Just as Protagoras held this philosophy, and the reliance of man to act as man, it is unlikely he could have ever known how Socrates, some many years later, would prove him right. This affirmation was best evidenced by the philosophical argument held between Socrates and Euthyphro regarding man’s moral obligations, and holiness.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are six evaluative principles that are used to evaluate moral theories. They are Consistency, Applicability, Publicity, Internal Support, External Support, and Explanatory Power. I am going to evaluate Divine Command Theory, Utilitarianism, Kantian Ethics, and Virtue Ethics using these six evaluative principles. First is Divine Command Theory (DCT). For Consistency, DCT is consistent because God either commands an act to be either right, wrong, or it is permissible if God has not claimed if it is right or wrong.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthyphro Dilemma The Euthyphro dilemma is an argument that was brought about by a question asked by Socrates during Plato’s Euthyphro. The question is seen to object the Divine Command Theory. Socrates asked, “is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?” or in other words, “Are morally good acts willed by God because they are morally good, or are they morally good because they are willed by God?”…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Where the beginning of Morality came from has been a huge debate among people for hundreds of years now. Morality can also be called the goodness in people or the desire to be good. Theists believe morality comes from God. Atheists believe that morality comes from our own conscience or reason. In this essay we are going to focus on proving that morality could not have come from God in view of the following reasons, 1: You can be good without God, 2: The Bible is not a clear guide for direction on morality, 3: There are many things that religious people do not agree with, and 4: The problem of evil.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Original Sin Essay

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Aneta Zelenková We deal with morality daily; and so morality is very important study to know. It states what’s right and what’s wrong which changes humans thinking from the roots. We start with four topics, which Christians talked about for centuries: Human nature, pursuit of virtue, diversion and indifference and philosophy of life.…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firstly, morality is often influenced by religion by making people think they will be punished after they die for doing certain…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This suggests that no action can be held as being morally good unless God commands it. However a major problem with this is that Gods commands are seen to be arbitrary. There is no moral reason for Gods will, as he invents morality. This leaves morality with no rational structure. We can exemplify this with the following example; God commands that one should honour and respect their mother and father, and this is morally right.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays