The dispute stems from the audience and writer being at different “places” in terms of the stasis questions. The writer failure to meet some of the four basic stasis categories (fact, definition, quality and procedure/action), further establishes how participants might be at different "places" in terms of the stasis questions. The writer attempts to establish the fact that heart break can cause death. Participants may disagree with the existence of the disease, more specifically the idea that heartbreak can lead to a medical condition that causes an abnormal contracture of the heart. Participants may also disagree with the origin and reliability of the source. The writer stated that the study was a retrospective study and a prospective study
