On the other hand, Kant valued the internal reasoning behind external actions instead of the consequences associated with them. He would begin making ethical decisions by first asking specific questions that reflected his core values. Kant sought to make decisions that was best for everyone equally and that promotes the essentials for each individual (x)? So, Kant would counsel the individual to ask what decision is best for everyone. Would saving the five individuals by risking or causing the death of one person be the best for everyone, specifically the person[s] who would die? Second, Kant would urge the individual to ponder what decision would provide the needs of each person equally? For example, would killing the one individual provide the same amount of needs to him or her as compared to the other five?
