Federalist Vs Antifederalist Analysis

Improved Essays
In 1783 the English colonies had become the American colonies and were being lead by the Articles of Confederation and although the newly found freedom was much to celebrate the Articles of Confederation were not. This is because the 13 articles that composed the Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses and lacked a strong central government. After the Shay’s Rebellion, a series of protests lead by American farmers’ in Massachusetts against newly enforced tax collections, in 1787 it was clear to the leaders of the Americas that a change needed to happen. In order to make these changes a completely new document needed to be placed into action. With the idea of new governing document coming into place two political parties formed, the …show more content…
The Federalists paper one states that were believed in having a strong central government and wanted to evenly divide power among different branches of government. In writing the first Federalist paper Alexander Hamilton, the main author of the federalist papers shows the importance of the creation of the Constitution by stating that, “Nothing less than the existence of the union…the fate of an empire, in many respects, the most interesting in the world” and that a wrong choice in which laws go into the constitution would be, “Considered as the general misfortune of mankind” Hamilton goes on to explain the order of the Federalist papers and puts strong emphasis on what the, “Utility of the Union” could mean to this country. In comparison the Anti-Federalist paper one follows roughly the same outline as the Federalist paper 1, mostly because the Antifederalist papers were written in retaliation to the publication of the Federalist papers. The Antifederalist paper one begins with addressing the people and explaining that the laws that go into this constitution will, “Reserve the invaluable blessings of liberty, to secure the inestimable rights of mankind… promote human happiness… lay a lasting foundation of happiness for millions yet unborn; generations to come will rise up and call you blessed” only if they are chosen correctly. Then, like the first Federalist paper, the first Antifederalist paper begins to give an overview of what the 84 other papers will be talking about and lightly states the importance of leaving political powers in the states and how now all of the branches of government should be considered equal. As the papers continue their differences become more noticeable and you can really tell when comparing Federalist paper 10 and Antifederalist paper

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Short Essay #1: Shay’s Rebellion Following the Treaty of Paris of 1783 that ended the American Revolution, America claimed its independence and the young nation started as a confederation under the Articles of Confederation. Because the Founding Fathers were afraid of a strong government, they founded a limited government under the articles that gave no power to tax or raise a militia. The event of Shay’s rebellion highlighted the weaknesses of the articles of confederation and led to the establishment of the United States Constitution.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eric Foner’s (2010) “Founding a Nation, 1783-1791,” describes the events that led to the formation of a strong central government and the creation of the US Constitution in 1787. Shay’s Rebellion brought out the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, which gave the federal government very limited powers when it came to raising funds to provide for the general defense of the states. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government did not have the ability to raise funds for the national army through taxation. Rather, it relied upon voluntary contributions from the states. Shay’s Rebellion occurred as a result of sudden tax increases in the state of Massachusetts to pay off state debts and the absence of a national army.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To this day, both sides, Anti-Federalist and Federalist, sound persuasive. The Anti-Federalists focused on the American want for local governments that respond directly to popular concerns. The Federalists argued that only a national government could really protect the people’s rights and turn the new nation into a great power. But more than just this are many other issues including that smaller states, who feel that they are operating just fine, will get the short end of the straw.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 13 Dbq

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Anti-Federalists argued that a stronger national government must be accompanied by explicit safeguards against tyranny. The Anti-Federalists supported states’ rights. 20. What were the Federalists Papers and why were they so critical to ratification of the Constitution?…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Newly attained independence upon the denouement of the Revolution, provoked fierce debate concerning the proper governmental path. America was divided into two factions: Federalists and Republicans. James Madison in unison with his fellow federalists pursued a centralized government and ratification of the Constitution. The Constitutional Convention of 1787 assembled to address the increasingly overt weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists wanted a more centralized government, favored the Bill of Rights, Separation of Powers which made 3 equal branches of government, judicial, executive, and legislative. The Anti-Federalists believed in states’ rights and states’…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Shay's Rebellion

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Anti-Federalists feared a powerful government would oppress the people. They argued that the new constitution was too much like the powerful British Monarchy. Anti-federalist thought the power should remain with the states and local governments.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without Shays’ Rebellion, our nation's leaders would not have realized the problems The Articles of Confederation caused for the people. The leaders that realized this problem were George Washington, Alexander Hamilton and James Madison. They fixed this problem by starting the drafting of The Constitution at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. Shay’s Rebellion was an important conflict caused by the government’s weak economic policy and led to the actual rebellion which then resulted in the Constitutional Convention.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the Federalist and anti-Federalist parties disagreed as to how much power the national authority needed, both parties agreed that a national authority was needed and that the national authority would require an individual source of income to function as it should. Both the Federalist and the anti-Federalist Parties also agreed that the people needed protection against dictatorship and other forms of tyranny. Even though neither party completely liked every part of the Constitution, both parties could agree that overall the Constitution was the “best document obtainable”. Federalists were the young, educated men who supported the idea of a centralized federal system and the Constitution’s ratification. They liked the fact that the Constitution could have a “broad interpretation” when situations arose that required such flexibility.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1787 the weak form of government brought together by the Articles of Confederation was not doing its justice for the colonists. In the Article of Confederation, there was only one branch of government, and that one branch had no power over the states. This soon proved itself to be ineffective to be a national government for the people. To remedy this problem the Founding Fathers got together at the Philadelphia Convention to discuss a new plan for the government. The Founding Fathers decided not to revise the Articles of Confederation, but to create a completely new constitution.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The federalist of the Constitution were the people who supported it. The anti-federalist were those who went against it. Federalist thought that the Constitution was based on federalism. The anti-federalist believed that the Constitution took too much power away from the states and did not insured rights for the people. The federalists even wrote essays to answer the anti-federalist attacks to the Constitution.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This was the product of the Anti-Federalists and the Federalists debates. These two groups fiercely disagreed more over the means than the ends. Both sides acknowledged that a stronger national authority was needed and that such an authority required an independent source of revenue to function properly. They also both agreed that safeguards against tyranny need to be established. But, they disagreed on whether the enumeration of federal power would by itself serve to restrain the national government within those powers.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of the group’s disagreements, they came to write explanations for their position in essay. These essays came to be known as The Federalist Papers and The Anti-federalist Papers. The Federalist papers had a main reason to convey the interpretation to the new constitution. While the Anti-Federalist Papers was pleading those who still secured their rights to allow discussion over the same document. By reading them, we learn that the Anti-Federalist did not think the new Constitution accurately explained the rights of its…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Anti-Federalists felt that states were free agents that should manage their own revenue and spend their money as they saw fit, while the Federalists felt that many individual and different fiscal and monetary policies led to economic…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists believed that the Constitution covered the natural rights given to a citizen, while the Anti-Federalists believed that the creation of a Bill of Rights was necessary to protect the individual rights of the…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays