Compare And Contrast Thoreau And Machiavelli

Improved Essays
The difference of Machiavelli and Thoreau’s view on governing comes from the fact that they both are taking opposite perspectives on the same issue. Both discuss harsh governing. Machiavelli views it as necessary, while Thoreau views it as unjust, however Machiavelli is writing as one who governs, while Thoreau is writing as one being governed. The difference in audience is the cause for the differences between Machiavelli and Thoreau’s understanding of morality, humanity, and efficiency.
As someone who is being governed by a government he finds unjust, Thoreau believes we must object to anything we find morally wrong. He claims the public must rely on their morals, and conscience to stand up to a government that does not rely on morals and
…show more content…
Contrarily Machiavelli is targeting the audience of a ruler, not of one being …show more content…
He believes in an idealistic world in which some men will dedicate their lives to the eradication of government immorality. He calls on the public to, "Let your life be a counter friction to stop the machine." He has hope that, although often the masses are more like sheep than men, some will rise above and stand up to what they believe is wrong. More importantly Thoreau believes that the public has the ability to detect right from wrong, moral from immoral. This is something he does not question. Often he calls men weak and unable to stand up for what is right, but never does he say that the public cannot detect what is right vs. what is wrong. However Machiavelli sees the public as, "ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly, and covetous (Machiavelli XVII)." and most importantly easily controlled. The Price reads as a how-to guide on easily manipulating men; Machiavelli believes as a ruler you can rely on the people not speaking out against you as long as you appear to be virtuous. Unlike Thoreau who has faith in human nature to notice when the government or a Prince is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He argued against the government making their own decisions based of their own consciences, and not the people’s. Thoreau summarizes this with a quote, “That government is best which governs…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thoreau writes, “How can a man be satisfied to entertain an opinion merely, and enjoy it?” (Thoreau 232). In simpler terms, how can someone stand back and complain about how terrible something is, yet do nothing about it? Many could say that Thoreau’s action towards fixing the injustices in society was simply writing “Resistance to Civil Government.” In writing this piece he presents a rally cry for others to do something about the things they believe are wrong.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. define the profound difference between just and unjust in their writings, “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” While the two men have a different sound throughout each of their own pieces, there is much that they agree upon about civil disobedience once clearly thought out and read. With that being said, this paper will, respectively, discuss the general content of both writings, as well as the prominent similarities and differences noticeable in the two pieces. An example of political/cultural problems the United States is facing today that emulate civil disobedience will also be presented that link to both pieces. Towards the end of this paper, I intend…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many political philosopher’s eyes, there is a special relationship between the ideas of moral goodness and legitimate authority. Some of these political philosophers believed that the use of political power was only morally correct if it was exercised under a ruler who had virtuous morals. These rulers who had virtuous morals were then told that in order to be successful, they needed to make decisions in accordance with the standards of ethical goodness. This moralistic view of authority is what Machiavelli criticizes in his work “The Prince.” In Machiavelli’s book, “The Prince,” the readers are introduced to political values that do not necessarily give full recognition to morality or religion.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues in “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” that the government no longer does what it was created to do; subjects people to follow and support its decisions, without necessarily informing people of their choice; and limits the freedoms people have in society. Thoreau wants to convince his readers to begin thinking and living in the manner he does. His arguments ultimately lead his audience to experience feelings of injustice, and want to become more involved in deciding how they are governed through the use of civil…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This, to Thoreau, is injustice that should be fought so that everyone is treated with equality. Also, it has been obviously proven to us by both Thoreau and King that the government will take all the power that it is given. King says that the people should fight for justice to avoid giving the government this additional power. He says he has “earnestly opposed violent tension, but there is a type of constructive, non-violent tension which is necessary for growth [of the society]” (King, 2).…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He writes that he tries to give as little thought as possible to the government. Thoreau still believes that the government can improve; he gives credit to the Constitution, the law, the courts, and even the government, nothing that these are all things for which to be grateful. Democracy, though, is not the final step of achieving an ideal government; once the government realizes and values the role of the individual and his or her power, and treats him or her with the required respect, it will be able to advance and change for the better. To concretize his point and make it relatable to readers, Thoreau uses metaphor, a rhetorical device that compares two objects, to prove a point. In “Civil Disobedience”, he employs this device in order to prove a point about the government; by comparing the government to objects, Thoreau subtly acknowledges its incompetence and uselessness.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He incorporates an antithesis which supports his belief that government is bad and the virtuous man is good. Likewise, the virtuous individual is discouraged by an amoral government, but the amoral government should be discouraged by the virtuous individual. This antithesis serves to profess who is inclined to be disobedient. Thoreau also used aphorisms such as “it is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right.” His aphorisms teach his audience the moral and universal truths embedded in his message.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wood insist the essay was a narrative and dramatic essay which caused critics to think his work was out of proportion and uninteresting. Wood thinks his focus and accomplish was too dramatic and narrative form, yet his work lacked the message to his essay on being a truly self-reliant man. Wood and other critics expected to read and get the message with more supporting details on civil disobedience rather than his experience and thoughts. Thoreau offered encouragement to the individual’s rights, to withdraw any support from a government whose policies are evil. He was such a moral thinker, did not fear possible consequences of civil disobedience against injustice.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli dives into politics with a very aggressive and pure mindset suggesting kings and princes to only worry about the end result without caring for the means of achieving it. Informing the readers that they should do anything it takes to get into and stay in power, the ends justify the means ideal. Machiavelli states that “Every one sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are, and those few dare not oppose themselves to the opinion of the many, who have the majesty of the state to defend them; and in the actions of all men, and especially of princes, which it is not prudent to challenge, one judges by the result.” essentially saying even if the means are unjust the people only see and judge you by the results. However, the “few” mentioned by him will eventually lead to a breach in society.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also uses imagery in order to persuade the reader of his idea. He also stated that the citizens must be sentient to the laws they obey and disobey. It is up to every man to decide based on his own moral standards and ethics what law he deemed unrespectable; he also accomplishes appealing to human consciousness over logic. Thoreau also writes, "If I have unjustly wrested a plank from a drowning man, I must restore it to him though I drown myself"(Thoreau).It can interpreted to if you don’t believe in what the government is doing as being appropriate, you should disobey that government even if the final consequences is that the government won’t protect your rights…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It also helps to illustrate the wrongdoings of the government, most likely evoking a realization the system needs to change. Although Thoreau hasn’t identified specific issues yet, he has hooked the reader in, already causing them to feel as though something needs to be reformed. Later on, through the use of rhetorical questions, Thoreau hones in on specific affairs, catching the focus of the reader and thus prompting specific solutions. He asks, “Can there not be a government in which majorities do not virtually decide right and wrong, but conscience?” Thoreau goes on to describe the importance of a conscience, and the ways in which the country’s conscience has failed, chiefly with the presence of slaves and the Mexican-American War.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli theory argues that a ruler must do whatever it takes to gain and hold political power, but in the eyes of his subjects have the appearance of being morally…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Organization of Society Machiavelli’s The Prince, a story is told, explaining multiple routes of portraying his definition of a “good” prince. He then divulges his beliefs of how one should never forget to prepare for or contemplate war, study history, remain armed at all times and be a “miser”. Rousseau’s The Origin of Civil Society, is based upon an entirely different morale which derives from reasoning and ethics.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays