The Difference Between Natural Science And Human Science Essay
As witnessed in various academic fields and branches, theories can either precede a fact or a fact can precede a theory. The difference, however, is in the type of analysis being, the mode of examination, and what is already known in the natural world. Based on this, theories should precede facts because they are needed to make sense of facts as they are universally applicable, but this is only the case in natural sciences and not in human sciences where the problem of induction persists. This paper argues about the differences in theory and fact application as regards natural science and human science.
Natural science is a discipline of science that investigates the physical worlds. It involves application of empirical studies to established facts as done in physics and chemistry (Callaway 266). Natural science applies deductive thinking, which is “the process of using general rule to make a prediction about a future action or even” (Marzano et al. 104). It involves using what is already know to make predictions that form hypotheses that are tested to verify their truthfulness. Deductive thinking is the primary reason why theories of natural science precede facts. In natural science, it can be argued that theories should be established because they create a universal framework that apply to all facts and not just specific examples.
Albert Einstein’s Special and General Theory of…