Aristotle And Hobbes: The Argument Of A Good Life

Great Essays
The difference between Aristotle and Hobbes: with regards to happiness and felicity is the argument of what a good life. Hobbes argues that human reliably follow the law of nature to reason to help us aim to live a better life. Aristotle theory says that we should be a virtue, it 's a divine from the bottom of our heart, a virtue within us. Aristotle differentiates the argument on our belief about good and bad, while Hobbes argues that good and bad virtue varies from each individual when desiring. Individuals desire and seeks for more, leading to a possibility of hatred and bad desired. Aristotle makes it known that individual has an ultimately a purpose - a function to which we live by. Hobbes and Aristotle idea of the ultimate good life differences …show more content…
Men are equal, all with different talent. Having talents allows a human to fulfill those talents, we can 't live without. Hobbes view is that all men should have an equal right, allowing them to govern themselves, for example, The Lord of the Rings. And all though the children were able to govern themselves in the lord of the ring, they became to desire the same things, and eventually become enemies with one another. if the children put their talent talents on the table like Piggy, they could have come to an agreement to help each other and survive. This is an example, of when two people desire the same thing they become enemies., they need to make sacrifices to help each other and live a felicity life, and instead of seeking revenge we need to make sacrifices for the other. Following the law of nature is revenge we want to encourage people to be better and to avoid coming enemies. "From this equality of ability arise the equality of hope in the attaining of our ends. And therefore if any two men desire the same thing, which nevertheless they can both enjoy, they become enemies: and in the way to their end ...endeavor to destroy, or subdue one another.- (184) Encouraging other allow us to live a comfortable and preserve

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    According to Hobbes, man’s life in the state of nature was one of fear and selfishness. He believes man natural liberty must be limited because, “all mankind [has] a perpetuall and restlesse desire of Power after power, that ceaseth onely in Death”. Under Hobbes philosophies, a social contract focuses man to surrender all their rights and freedoms to an authority. This authority will then protect the lives and properties of the people. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen establishes Hobbes often discussed “natural rights of man [which] are the sole causes of the miseries of the world”.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes states that “in order to live a more contented life… men must give up their freedom to the State” (Document 2). He believed that people were naturally cruel and needed protection from themselves. Hobbes wanted rule by absolute monarchs. He thought it was the only way to keep people in check. His beliefs closely supported how many people thought back then.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The philosopher believes that by our nature, we are meant to aspire to a life of excellence and that we are rational and social animals that have habits of thought and feeling. Aristotle believes that we should adopt ways to continually have a well rounded…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes arrived at the idea that all people were created equal because he felt that in a natural world without government that everyone was created equal. He also believed that this was part of the problem – the reason that people chose to rebel and combat each other to fulfill their interests because that meant that no person could rise above…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes Vs Kant On Morality

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Hobbes view, he is considered to purse what is most desirable to be in balance with the physical matter in motion, therefore what we think is good is actually formed motions within us. Hobbes believes that anything in relation to good or evil can either be caused by the sovereign state, which everyone is abided too, or by individuals. For example, the use of drugs can bring delight but at the same it is risky making the action impossible. Ones goal is to satisfy the needs of their last desire or aversion. In comparison to Hobbes’ view, Kant displays his opinion through good will, “will can be called absoulety good without qualification?…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hi everyone! My biggest reaction to the readings was Glaucon and Hobbes’ three counts of how we live in a selfish society. The first issue, “(1) Humans choose to live in a society with rules because they are concerned with their own safety and for no other reason,” (Rosenstand, pg. 178). This makes sense to me, and I do not see what purpose most rules would serve a purpose for in our society if it did not help preserve our safety.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a paper comparing the Aristotle and Hobbes understandings of human nature. Aristotle states that man is a “political animal”, and that it is thus natural for man to live in a polis. Hobbes disagrees with this understanding of man a political animal, as he claims that man is actually a greedy being that is driven by power. Thus he feels that the natural state of man is a state of war. Although the two disagree initially about the man’s natural state, Aristotle comes to agree with Hobbes’ view since they agree that without a common sense of justice that individuals have no reason to live together.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethical theories of both Aristotle and Epictetus, laid out in their books the Nicomachean Ethics and the Enchiridion, respectively, offer humanity insight into the most effective ways to achieve happiness and to exhibit virtue. Aristotle’s approach to happiness is that it must be looked at as the end to a means not as a means to an end. He feels that happiness should be viewed as the highest good within life. Although Epictetus agrees that happiness is the highest attainable good, he believes that the source of humanity’s misery is people’s inability to differentiate between what they can control and what they cannot. While both philosopher’s theories emphasize the importance of happiness and virtue in a person’s life, Epictetus’ view…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Anarchism: What It Really Stands For, Emma Goldman states: “Every fool, from king to policeman, from the flatheaded parson to the visionless dabbler in science, presumes to speak authoritatively of human nature”. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, two of the most influential modern philosophers, presumed to speak authoritatively on human nature. They presumed so much so, that each of the philosophers dedicated the bulk of a novel to discussing their interpretation of human nature. In fact, Goldman herself speaks quite extensively on her interpretation of human nature. Hobbes, Locke, and Goldman fit together nicely on the philosophy of human nature spectrum.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both theorists believe in natural rights and freedoms and how men establish governments in order to secure peace however they differ on the purpose of government. Hobbes believed the purpose of government is to impose law and order to prevent the state of war. Locke believed the purpose of government is to secure natural rights, namely man’s property and liberty. Both refer to a “state of nature” in which man exists without government, and both speak of risks in this state. However, while both speak of the dangers of a state of nature, Hobbes is more pessimistic, whereas Locke speaks of the potential benefits.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The philosophers Aristotle and Augustine both wrote extensively on what they believed happiness was and how to achieve the good life. However, both prolific thinkers had differing opinions on achieve this goal. For example, Aristotle believed that the path to the good life was obtained through reason; whereas Augustine believed that it was obtained through Scripture and Divine Revelation because God’s grace helps one to achieve the good life, but reason alone is not enough to get that. In Nichomachean Ethics, Aristotle shares his belief that the way to a good life, which he refers to as happiness, is achieved through reason.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hobbes

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hobbes’ maintains humans have a “natural condition,” which may be either blissful or brutish. Given such condition, Hobbes asks, how members of society to act/ought to be. Intuitively many philosophers agree members of a society existing blissfully is not only preferred, but better. And, if we grant what is better for society captures that which is good for a society, then individuals ought to act according to the promotion of this peaceful societal end. One objection to Hobbes comes from whether an individual has the right to opt-out of the contract.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What, according to Aristotle, is the relationship between happiness and virtue? Working to possess and exercise virtue is essential to achieve the highest degree of happiness. Virtuousness is a unique element of happiness in the sense that we can work to control it through our own habituation. This can be compared to the plethora of components that our disposition creates a predetermined outcome for, including the external and physical goods we desire. Aristotle expands on this idea, stating that when happiness, “...comes as a result of virtue and some process of learning or training, [it is] among the most god-like things; for that which is the prize and end of virtue seems to be the best thing in the world, and something godlike and blessed” (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, 947).…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every person in the world seeks attributes in his or her life that end in pleasure, goodness and happiness. It is then we come to find why humans seek these characteristics in their day to day lives. According to Aristotle, he distinguishes between these three attributes pleasure, goodness, and happiness and answers the overall question on why humans seek these characteristics in their lives. Within Aristotle’s text, he goes into depths on happiness, the virtues and the mean of reason, and lastly how to achieve the good life. From a young age we began to understand the simple terms of our feelings, distinguishing them between the words happy, sad, or angry.…

    • 2041 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without it, Hobbes envisions a world in which there is “war of every man against every man” and exemplified his view of the state of nature as a brutal scenario where the life of man is “nasty, brutish, and short” (Jovanoski, 2014, p.334). Hobbes, being a materialist, mirrors a theory of conservative motion:…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics