Aristotle Who We Are Analysis

Improved Essays
In order to understand the job of the human being, Aristotle suggests that we should first understand ourselves as “who we are.” Human beings are living beings, but so are plants and animals, and that is what makes us different? Human beings differ from plants because plants cannot move, but animals are able to walk and move from point A to point B. The difference between animals and humans is that humanity is capable of articulation, which derives from thinking and reasoning.Therefore, the human work is to deliberate, think and reason. Of course Aristotle says that the human work (think and reason), must be done well in order to live a good life. Hence, if a person would like to live a good life, he or she must be able to think well, reason well, and articulate eloquently to share their thoughts.
Moving forth, Aristotle says that “the human good comes to be disclosed as a being-at work of the soul in accord with virtue.” Aristotle is trying to say that a person who practices well thinking and reasoning must also apply certain virtues in their practice, in order to display human good. In other words, humanity must be ethical when performing their job as humans, because that is how an
…show more content…
In different cultures, one is taught many virtues, but in order for that person to actually acquire a virtue that person must display it consistently. For instance, a person who wants to learn to be courageous, that person must practice it in a given situation. If a guy finds a girl attractive and would like to ask her out on a date but is afraid to do so, this guy must build up nerve and ask the girl out because that is the experience that he needs in order to become courageous. However, if the person does not ask the girl out because he is fearful and timid, then this person will not learn what is like to be courageous. Instead this person will have displayed the opposite of courage and that is

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle decided to take on the subject of the good in his Nicomachean Ethics. Aristotle argues that every person must make a choice to act good. Within his ideas of the good it is imperative that men take responsibility for their own actions and that they understand what their own intentions are doing in relation to the good. However, there are some oppositions that believe this is not the case. They would argue that men have no control over how something appears to them or how they perceive it, and that for every man the final end/good/happiness looks differently.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To conclude, Aristotle is a strong believer that in order to live a truly good life, a virtuous person is someone who performs the distinctive activity of being a human. Rationality is our unique activity, that is, the activity that characterizes us differently from animals. Since our rationality is our distinctive activity, its exercise is the supreme good. Moral virtue is simply a matter of performing well in the function of being human. In order to be virtuous, the end of human life could be called happiness (or living well).…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Then if one were to attempt to justify Aristotle 's argument that it would seem that, fist we must understand that in Aristotle 's mind that ethics is not a theoretical concept but an attempt to a more complete understanding of human good. This is to say if a person is better to understand human good it is not simply because to know human good in a quantified understanding is the end goal, or for the simple sake of knowledge but rather a process to that understanding. It is further assumed that a list of human…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Miss Evers Boys Sparknotes

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The great philosopher Aristotle believed that being a “good person” is about being virtuous, finding the right balance between the two extremes of character, also known as the ‘golden mean’. He believed that we could all become good by doing…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The practice of ethics is a skill: a person can practice and develop upon their current abilities to improve them. Willful acceptance that most everything that we do is a skill is a part of the fundamental difference between those with a growth mindset and those with a fixed mindset. Individuals with a growth mindset tend to see their weaknesses as areas of improvement, whereas those with a fixed mindset typically resign themselves to the belief that they are bad at something. By improving upon your skills, you are choosing to grow as a person and, by causation, benefiting society. Both of these are a tenet to Aristotle’s view of virtuous action.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue Ethics (Individualism) and Care Ethics (Collectivism) Virtue ethics or Individualism is having the excellence of moral; righteousness, responsibility, and other exemplary qualities. Care ethics, or feminist theory, states that women and men have different ethical practices. However, no one person, man or woman, is better or superior to another.…

    • 1967 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical Theory Of Virtue

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When one hears the word “virtue” they think of righteousness and excellence. A person’s character is the entirety of his character trait. Our traits can go from being morally good, bad or somewhere in between. They can be laudable or not. The laudable character traits, the marks of greatness in character, are called virtues.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Too much of it makes one reckless and rash, while too little bravery makes one a coward. For instance, imagine a person who cannot swim being faced with a situation in which a child is drowning in a pool. If one has an excess of bravery, one may attempt to jump into the pool to try and save the child, but, since one cannot swim, this may end up disastrously, with even perhaps two casualties. In that case, that person, despite displaying a great amount of bravery (which can often be mistakenly construed as good), ought to be blamed for being unreasonable and reckless. Conversely, if one has a deficiency of bravery, one may just freeze in place and watch the child drown, without taking any action whatsoever to save him or her.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Though, humans are already equipped by nature with the ability to learn how to become virtuous and how to perfect that skill. To attain virtues, we must “…learn before we can do them, we learn by doing them, e. g. men become builders by building and lyreplayers by playing the lyre,” and as we cultivate these virtuous skills through habitually exercising them akin to how we learn other skills in life, “…so too we become just by doing just acts, temperate by doing temperate acts, brave by doing brave acts.” However, the nature of virtue is characteristically different from how we attain other skills, “for the products of the arts have their goodness in themselves, so that it is enough that they should have a certain character, but if the acts that are in accordance with the virtues have themselves a certain character it does not follow that they are done justly or temperately,” essentially meaning that other skills yield objects that in themselves are enough to name that person skilled, but for virtues, though the virtue performed itself may be morally good, the person performing may not be virtuous themselves. It is not enough that the virtue simply be performed, but that the one performing the action is doing so under certain conditions when one does…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each human has a purpose in their life, an end goal, and when they reach that purpose they gain a greater understanding of what life and the things in that life are, “Aristotle agrees with Plato that all things have a purpose or function, and understanding those purposes, goals, or functions is how to understand things themselves.” (Classical Ethics, 37). Aristotle also believes that a humans can’t have true happiness without truly satisfying what there function is, “… Aristotle argued that happiness is not possible without the excellent functioning of a human being’s unique capacity or ability, that is, reason.” (Classical Ethics, 48). The Philosophers discuss the fact that one must be virtues and becomes virtues when searching for the good life, “Thus, Plato concludes that moral virtue is ultimately based on knowledge of the Supreme Form of the Good.”…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of Aristotle’s function argument is to determine the function of the human being, in order to identify the true human good. The role of the argument in Aristotle’s investigation is to eliminate typical natures belonging to living species and determine the characteristic that is most unique to human life, which is ration. Then stating how human function is an activity of the soul, Aristotle uses his elimination method to state that in order for the human function to be performed well, that it must act in accordance with ration. It is useful to understand the concept of function as it applies to human beings because without it, we would not understand how it connects with our virtues and human good. Virtues, as Aristotle describes them, are best when they are complete and self-sufficient because we are pursuing them for no other reasons but themselves.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Contrasting Plato’s theory of Dualism , Aristotle explains that the body and mind are one thing that cannot be separated. Aristotle claims that motion is eternal. Introducing us the idea of happiness, Aristotle questions what we do to make our life good or something that makes us be alive. He states that the psyche or soul part of our life like happiness consists a good life for humans.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How is human existence improved or degraded after the passage of nature to society? Aristotle feels that not only is human existence greatly improved by society but society is absolutely necessary for him to truly and fully experience his existence. Aristotle claims that humanity is only self-sufficient in a society. " The complete community...is the city.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    NTRODUCTION of philosophy: Those stories from claiming theory Previously, Western progress starts to aged Greece, which generated three of the world’s best thinkers, namely, Socrates, Plato and aristotle. Same time it might a chance to be decent on start our contemplate with Socrates, the primary unmistakable figure in the history for philosophy, those truth is that Socrates didn't make as much sees from dainty air. Rather, he might have been those outgrowth of a strikingly ripe philosophical surroundings inside Greece that needed been germinating for several a long time.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle believes that everything has a characteristic function. For example a hammers function is to hammer things. He comes to the conclusion that a human 's characteristic function is reason. In order to be good one must be an expert at their characteristic function, which is reason. Virtue is important in that it leads to the good life.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays