Peace operations of the League of Nations and those of the United Nation are similar but different. Both the United Nation and the League of Nations were groups that were meant to help and solve international disasters and crisis, and ultimately try to make the world a better. The United Nations objectives is to maintain international peace and security, to prevent threats to peace. In 1920 The League of Nations was created, it was initiated after World War I, to prevent and avoid any future world wars. After World War I was over the League of Nations didn’t really serve any purpose and the new leaders wanted a new international organization. Thus paving the way for the United Nations, in 1946, the League of Nations was replaced. The League of Nations and the United Nations both had the same game plan, however, the most important difference is that the United Nations had its own peacekeepers from all its allied states. The League of Nations was just a group of countries in it for the perks and economic reliefs. Because of the times difference and lack of …show more content…
Robust peacekeeping moves the peace operations towards the strong-arm end of the use of force scale, instead of winning the hearts and minds first, let’s take over and then go with the hearts and minds ideal. (Diehl, P., & Balas, A. (2014)) The robust peacekeeping approached pretty much eliminated the rules of engagement (EOF) it allowed the deployed troops to use force if deem necessary to complete their