Insanity Defense In Insanity Defense

Improved Essays
Insanity defenses are mostly used in murder cases such as the James Holmes case or other serious felony charges. Insanity tests that are used determine legal and moral liability which determines the validity of an insanity defense. Andersen and Gardner states, “When a defendant is found insane at the time the crime occurred, the court enters a judgment of not guilty by reason of insanity, and the defendant may never again be tried for that offense”(Gardner and Andersen 116). The insanity defense also discusses the charge/defense of guilty but mentally ill that has been adopted by certain states in the United States. According to Criminal Law Twelfth Edition, “The incidence of people who are found not guilty because of insanity and who then …show more content…
The suspect, James Holmes, made a not guilty plea by reason of insanity in this case. Holmes had a lot going for him as he was a former doctoral student at the University of Colorado. On July 20, 2012, Holmes entered the Aurora theater armed with an AR-15 rifle, a 12-gauge shotgun, and a .40 caliber pistol and began shooting until he killed 12 and wounded 70. He was found guilty of first-degree murder of the 12 victims that died, and also of attempted murder of the 70 victims he injured. Moreover, his insanity plea was rejected because of the extensive amount of evidence that was used in the case against him. The mental health experts assigned to his case thought that he was not insane at the time the crime was committed. The opposing side also tried to prove that he was mentally stable on the day of the shooting. According to CNN, the prosecutors in his trial asserted, “His mental illness didn’t prevent him from acting ‘rationally’ elsewhere in his life, and the defendant must be responsible for the mass murder” …show more content…
The Expert Testimony and the Effects of a Biological Approach, Psychopathy, and Juror Attitudes in Cases of Insanity section of the “Behavioral Sciences & the Law" article, “The public tends to view the insanity defense with suspicion, imagining that sane perpetrators of heinous crimes routinely feign mental illness to escape criminal responsibility. Certainly influenced by John Hinckley’s acquittal (United States v. Hinckley, 1981), the public’s negative perception of the insanity defense led to dramatic reforms, which constricted or even eliminated the ‘‘not guilty by reason of insanity’’ (NGRI) plea in many jurisdictions (Comprehensive Criminal Reform Act, 1984)”. Similar to how some of the families of the victims thought that Mr. Holmes should take responsibilities for his actions, the public was disappointed with the results of the John Hinckley case. John Hinckley was a man who tried to assassinate President Reagan in an attempt to please Jodie Foster, who was then a student at Yale University. Both of these cases were a strong examples of how the system in many different states sometimes does not agree with what the public

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I, Judge Awotwi, presided over the mock trial State Prosecution vs. Macbeth, and it is my duty to uphold the rule of law and instruct true justice upon this issue. The defendant entered a plea of insanity due to delusional compulsion before this court on October 24, 2017, after committing beyond a doubt one count of murder and two counts of felony murder. The question is not whether Macbeth committed these crimes, or if he is judged to be found guilty; it is to judge if the defendant “did not have [the] mental capacity to distinguish between right and wrong”, and that is the responsibility of the court (16-3-2). Due to the facts presented in court I have come to a verdict. The defense’s unique argument and main points overwhelmed the predominant…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The insanity plea is a defense in the court of law put in place for people who suffer from mental illness and commit crimes. Under this defense, the mentally ill are not entirely held responsible for their actions given the terms that they were not in the correct state of mind when the crime took place. The person would admit to committing the crime, but then say they are not guilty by reason of insanity (Francone). This plea has been used in my cases throughout history.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Their proof must show that the accused has criminal liability, accountability, or culpability (Pg. 255). In the absence of one or both of the attributes the insanity may be used. To begin with, as stated by Torry and Billick, the insanity defense was used as far back as 1581 when there was a legal note in place for those who could distinguish the difference between right and wrong and those who could not (Pg. 256). By the Eighteenth Century the insanity defense was distinguished by, if the accused could only understand the ramifications of what he had done like an infant or even a wild animal would, then he would not be held responsible for said crime. Today, however, the law uses several different rules, including the M’Naghten rule, to determine if person’s mental state during the act of committing the crime was such that he will use the insanity defense.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tests for insanity include M’Naghten Rule and the American Law Institute Model Penal Code. The M’Naghten Rule focuses on whether defendant knew nature of the crime or understood right from wrong at the time the crime was committed. Under the American Law Institute (ALI) a defendant may be found not guilty by reason of insanity if lacking either cognitive or volitional (irresistible impulse) capacity. The ALI test provides “A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity either to the appreciate the criminality (wrongfulness) of his conduct or to conform this conduct to the requirements of the law” (Goldstein. Morse, & Packer, 2013, p.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The courts held in favor of Arizona stating that insanity standards are open to state choice (2004). Clark vs. Arizona relevance - It is important that the evaluating mental health professional to be aware of state standards for the insanity defense. The statues vary by state. The role of the mental health professional is to prove the mental illness of the defendant at the time of the criminal act to assist in the Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity plea.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever wondered why people have not pleaded guilty for a crime that they committed? According to the article, High Court Reviews Insanity-Defense Case, we can argue to ways in which we either believe that insanity plea should be allowed in the court or not. This article was written and debated in 2006. The author is Nina Totenberg. This article is about Eric Clark and how he pleaded in the court of Arizona.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some people are up against the concept of insanity defense where they believe everyone who commits crime must take the criminal responsibility for their deviant behavior. On the other hand, there are group of people who believe the NCRMD is necessary in our criminal justice system, in order to sustain the equality for mentally ill person. Thus, the question of whether NCRMD is necessary in our criminal justice system is not a black or white question where there is a clear answer. However, the truth is that the NCRMD defense has created in our criminal justice system with a good purpose of providing equal rights for the mentally disordered people. This criminal defense does not exists and works as the sink hole for the accused to easily escape or avoid his or her criminal responsibility.…

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    This Court will have to allow this defense because in Arizona 's limited insanity defense in Clark v. Arizona, and denied certiorari in Delling v. Idaho, a case alleging that Idaho 's replacement of the insanity defense with a "Guilty but mentally ill" verdict constitutes a due process violation. Because of the weighty implications of the decision to plead insanity, the defendant must be the one to decide whether to use the insanity…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Insanity Defense Papers

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to Morse and Richard, “some form of an insanity defense is a matter of fundamental fairness in a just society. It gives doctrinal expression to fundamental moral and legal principles that have been recognized by the common law for centuries and that the supreme court has repeatedly acknowledged (Morse, Richard, 488). Also, the insanity defense has been in the law since the 14th century and almost all state and federal law makers still agree on its importance today (Morse, Richard,…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Insanity Defense History

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For centuries, criminals have been categorized as insane, but does that justify their crime? The majority of higher profile criminals file for the insanity plea which then affects their punishment and life, causing us to consider if ours is safe. The insanity defense should not be admissible in court because of the interest for the public, increases in legal costs, and manipulation of the legal system. The insanity defense’s history plays into our everyday legal actions and in order to understand the problem, you need to understand the defense.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jrank points out that many people have misconceptions about the insanity defense. One of these misconceptions is that it is used more often than it actually is. The defense is only attempted in about one percent of all criminal cases, and only twenty percent of these attempts actually win their cases (Jrank 1). One thing that people do not think about is that when a defendant pleads insanity they are admitting their guilt; because of this if they do not win their plea they will automatically be given a guilty verdict. They could also receive a more severe punishment for trying to go through with an insanity defense if they are found to be free of any type of mental illness.…

    • 2325 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The state will imprison but also treat the defendant for their mental illness if they were declared “guilty but mentally ill”. There is an approval of the defense because the mentally ill defendant couldn’t understand that the criminal act they were committing was illegal. When the defendants are declared “not guilty by reason of insanity” then they will go free of prosecution and might be treated for their mental illness. People agree with the Insanity Defense because they think that the “insane” were not in the right mind at the time of the criminal action and could not decipher right from wrong or they didn’t know that their actions were criminal. These people think that the Insanity Defense is fair because, when the defendant is declared mentally insane than they may be incarcerated and treated; which will punish for the criminal act and treat them for their illness or they may only be treated which is believed to show that treatment is the goal and the way that is wanted to use to help the mentally ill instead of punishing them.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona is a case that had a lasting effect on the criminal justice field. The constitutional parameters that emerged due to the Miranda V. Arizona decision fall under the fifth amendment. The fifth amendment provides all citizens of the United States protection from self-incrimination while being questioned by law enforcement officials. The privilege against self-incrimination is an important constitutional provision that gives the suspect the right to decide, at any time, before or during questioning, the right to remain silent and the right to talk to a lawyer while being questioned Erastus-Obilo, B. (2018, May 01).…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the court cases that the Insanity Defense and is successful, 90% of the defendants that plead insanity have been previously diagnosed with a mental illness. (Lithwick).The Insanity Defense was first created it was used more as an argument for the defendant to pardon themselves from a sentence. Defendants that are found not fit to stand trial and plead insanity; will then in most cases be committed to a mental institution. The mental institutions that the defendants are sent to after the trials are in some cases worse than prisons. In the mental intuitions there is no allocated time period that the defendant will be in the intuitions, in some cases the offender will be committed for the rest of their lives.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Bartol and Bartol (2011, p. 244) if an individual pleads not guilty by the circumstance of insanity, then the psychiatric evaluation should be focused on the individual 's mental state at the time of the crime. This basis is very much in line with the recommendation of Dr. Siegel in his letter to the…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays