Deep Ecology Vs Ecofeminism

Deep ecology, ecofeminism, and social ecology have several similar aspects to their approaches, but also have a variety of differences that make them unique in their philosophy. One idea that is similar between all three approaches is the idea of radical change within societies worldwide. Although radical change is crucial to these philosophical approaches, there are differing systems that take place within each idea and different ecological challenges that are faced by them.
Deep ecology does not associate with one specific environmental philosophy, but rather describes numerous philosophies. It is closely connected to the Norwegian philosopher, Arne Naess, who held strong beliefs in the both human and nonhuman life having intrinsic value. …show more content…
It focuses mainly on lack of resources as well as the issue of pollution. Those who associate with the idea of deep ecology recognize the problem of drastically changing others world views to change systems for the betterment of the environment. According to Desjardins, “Deep ecologists use a variety of strategies to meet these challenges, including reliance on poetry, Buddhism, spiritualism, and political activism via civil disobedience and ecosabatoge.” Some examples of civil disobedience can be found in the organization, Greenpeace. This non-governmental organization is widely known for its criminal offenses that avoid damaging property and humans. Some include sailing ships into nuclear testing zones, which is the reason Greenpeace was founded, and climbing up smokestacks to protest pollution. Many of those who are involved with Greenpeace or other radical activist groups believe that it is morally justified to do whatever it takes to protect the environment. The holistic worldview of deep ecology uses the aforementioned principles to challenge and support ecological controversies. While ecology can be used to help certain problems, Naess believes that some issues cannot be fixed by ecology, such as wilderness destruction and the extinction of species. Ecology in some circles has become too politicized and too relied on in terms of scientific …show more content…
This is another way ecofeminism differs from traditional approaches; an ethics of care would recognize that this generation should care about what happens to those of the future, because ecofeminism analyzes our relationship with those people, even though they do not yet exist. Ecofeminism asks questions such as: Do we care about future generations? Do we have a relationship to them? What is the basis for our attachments to future generations? Because this is a very different way of thinking in the sense of moral standing, it is therefore similar to deep ecology in its unconventional approach. It also is similarly radical to deep ecology in its advocacy for social activism and major change. This approach can be applied to many environmental issues such as animal liberation, species extinction, and other issues that have to do with relational